STABLEGRC.COM
PPSI Readiness Map
What a Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuer must satisfy under U.S. federal law, as of July 18, 2026.
Summary
Governance · Three Lines Model (3LM)
The same provisions, grouped two ways. By framework answers “what does each rule require?”. By Three Lines answers “who is accountable?” — mapping every risk caption to its IIA Three Lines Model layer (145 of 218 provisions mapped).
bsa-fincen
BSA / FinCEN
-
31 U.S.C. § 5311 note (USA PATRIOT Act §314); 31 C.F.R. §§ 1010.520, 1010.540in force by July 18, 2026Section 314(a): FinCEN requests — financial institutions must search records for named subjects at law-enforcement request. Section 314(b): voluntary information sharing among financial institutions for AML purposes, with safe harbor from liability.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
31 C.F.R. § 1022.210 (MSBs); 31 C.F.R. § 1020.210 (banks); 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h)in force by July 18, 2026Covered financial institutions, including money services businesses that qualify as money transmitters for virtual currency activity, must establish and maintain a written AML program reasonably designed to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorism. Program elements: policies/procedures, designated compliance officer, training, independent testing, and (for certain institutions) customer due diligence.
- 2nd 2nd Line
- 3rd 3rd Line
Vendor candidates
- Chainalysis Chainalysis KYT supporting
- Coinbase (TRUST coalition) Travel Rule Universal Solution Technology (TRUST) supporting
- Elliptic Elliptic Lens supporting
- Notabene Transaction Authorization Protocol (TAP) supporting
- TRM Labs TRM Transaction Monitoring supporting
-
31 C.F.R. § 1022.220 (MSBs); 31 C.F.R. § 1020.220 (banks)in force by July 18, 2026Customer Identification Program requirements — verify identity of each customer, maintain records of identifying information, and check customer names against government lists. For virtual currency MSBs, CIP applies to exchanger/administrator customer relationships.
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Persona Persona KYA supporting
- Skyfire KYAPay supporting
- Sumsub Sumsub Agent KYC supporting
-
31 C.F.R. § 1010.311; 31 U.S.C. § 5313in force by July 18, 2026Currency Transaction Report filed for each transaction in currency of more than $10,000. Multiple same-day transactions by or on behalf of the same person aggregating to more than $10,000 are treated as a single transaction.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
31 C.F.R. § 1010.610; 31 U.S.C. § 5318(i)in force by July 18, 2026Enhanced due diligence for correspondent accounts maintained for foreign financial institutions. Includes reasonable steps to identify owners, conduct enhanced scrutiny to detect suspicious activity, and review PEP connections. The $50,000 threshold reflected here is used as a general EDD trigger for higher-value transactions in the Atlas; the statutory EDD obligations are ongoing for qualifying correspondent accounts.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN Guidance FIN-2013-G001 (2013-03-18)in force by July 18, 2026Administrator or exchanger of convertible virtual currency is a money transmitter under FinCEN regulations and therefore an MSB subject to BSA registration, AML program, SAR, CTR, Travel Rule, and recordkeeping obligations. Users of CVC solely for personal purchases are not money transmitters. Extended and clarified by FinCEN 2019 Guidance FIN-2019-G001.
- GB Governing Body
-
31 U.S.C. § 5330; 31 C.F.R. § 1022.380in force by July 18, 2026Money services businesses — including money transmitters, which under FinCEN's 2013 guidance encompasses administrators and exchangers of convertible virtual currency — must register with FinCEN and renew every two years. Registration forms (FinCEN Form 107) and maintained customer/agent lists.
- GB Governing Body
-
31 C.F.R. § 1020.320 (banks); 31 C.F.R. § 1022.320 (MSBs); 31 U.S.C. § 5318(g)in force by July 18, 2026SAR filing required for transactions the institution knows, suspects, or has reason to suspect involve funds from illegal activity, are designed to evade BSA, or have no apparent lawful purpose. MSB threshold: $2,000. Bank threshold: $5,000. Filing deadline: 30 days from detection (extendable to 60 days).
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Chainalysis Chainalysis KYT supporting
- Chainalysis Chainalysis Reactor evidence
- Elliptic Elliptic Lens supporting
- TRM Labs TRM Forensics evidence
- TRM Labs TRM Transaction Monitoring supporting
-
31 C.F.R. § 1010.410(f); 31 C.F.R. § 1020.410(a)in force by July 18, 2026Funds-transfer recordkeeping rule. For transmittals of funds of $3,000 or more, transmitters must include and transmit prescribed originator and beneficiary information (name, address, account number, amount, execution date, beneficiary institution). FinCEN's 2019 guidance extended the rule to convertible virtual currency transmittals by MSBs. The 2020 joint NPRM proposing a $250 cross-border threshold has not been finalized; the $3,000 threshold remains in force.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Coinbase (TRUST coalition) Travel Rule Universal Solution Technology (TRUST) primary
- Notabene Transaction Authorization Protocol (TAP) primary
cftc
CFTC
-
CEA §5b; 17 C.F.R. Part 39in force by July 18, 2026Entities performing clearing functions for futures, options, and swaps must register with the CFTC as Derivatives Clearing Organizations, satisfy core principles (financial resources, risk management, participant/product eligibility, default rules), and comply with ongoing supervisory requirements. Relevant to any venue clearing digital-asset derivatives or accepting tokenized collateral under the 2025 Pilot.
-
CFTC Press Release 9146-25 (2025-11-03) — Acting Chairman Phamin force by July 18, 2026Pilot program permitting specified digital assets — BTC, ETH, and USDC — to serve as collateral in CFTC-regulated derivatives markets. First formal CFTC pathway for digital-asset margining in U.S. futures and swaps markets. Participants must satisfy pilot-specific risk-management, custody, and valuation conditions.
-
CEA §1a(9); CFTC v. McDonnell, 287 F. Supp. 3d 213 (E.D.N.Y. 2018); CFTC enforcement doctrinein force by July 18, 2026Bitcoin, Ether, and other digital assets that function as commodities fall within the CFTC's jurisdiction as 'commodities' under CEA §1a(9). CFTC has asserted anti-fraud and anti-manipulation authority over spot markets in such digital commodities via CEA §6(c)(1). Payment stablecoins are excluded from 'commodity' status by GENIUS Act §17.
-
CEA §4d; 17 C.F.R. § 1.17in force by July 18, 2026Futures Commission Merchants — entities that solicit or accept orders for futures, options, or swaps and accept customer money or property — must register with the CFTC, maintain minimum financial requirements, segregate customer funds, and comply with risk-management and reporting obligations.
-
CEA §2(c)(2)(D); 7 U.S.C. § 2(c)(2)(D)in force by July 18, 2026Leveraged, margined, or financed retail transactions in commodities (including digital commodities) with retail customers are treated as futures transactions and subject to full CFTC jurisdiction unless actual delivery occurs within 28 days. Restricts how unregistered platforms may offer margined crypto trading to retail users.
-
CEA §6(c)(1); 17 C.F.R. § 180.1in force by July 18, 2026Prohibits fraud and manipulation in connection with any swap, or a contract of sale of any commodity in interstate commerce, or for future delivery on or subject to the rules of any registered entity. Applied by the CFTC to spot digital-commodity markets even where CFTC lacks affirmative registration authority over the venue.
-
CEA §§ 1a(49), 4s; 17 C.F.R. Part 23in force by July 18, 2026Entities that hold themselves out as dealers in swaps, make a market in swaps, or engage in more than a de minimis amount of swap-dealing activity must register with the CFTC as swap dealers. Registration triggers external business conduct standards, risk management, reporting, and Dodd-Frank clearing and margin requirements.
fatf-r15
FATF R.15
-
FATF Recommendation 15 Interpretive Note ¶4in force by July 18, 2026Full AML/CFT program obligations (Recommendations 10–21) apply to VASPs: customer due diligence, enhanced due diligence for higher-risk customers, reliance on third parties, correspondent relationships, politically exposed persons, wire transfer rules, new technologies, recordkeeping, suspicious transaction reporting, tipping-off prohibition, and internal controls. Implementation is via the member-jurisdiction AML statute.
- 2nd 2nd Line
- 3rd 3rd Line
Vendor candidates
- Chainalysis Chainalysis KYT supporting
- Elliptic Elliptic Lens supporting
- TRM Labs TRM Transaction Monitoring supporting
-
FATF Recommendation 10 (as applied via R.15 Interpretive Note ¶4); 2021 Updated Guidance ¶¶36–45in force by July 18, 2026VASPs must conduct CDD on customers before establishing business relationships or conducting occasional transactions. The occasional-transaction threshold for VAs is USD/EUR 1,000 (aligned with R.16 IN ¶7(b)). CDD includes identification and verification of customer identity, beneficial ownership, understanding the purpose and nature of the relationship, and ongoing due diligence. Enhanced due diligence is required for higher-risk customers, including cross-border correspondent VASP relationships (2021 Updated Guidance ¶¶97–102).
Vendor candidates
- Chainalysis Chainalysis KYT supporting Continuous transaction monitoring extends CDD beyond onboarding.
- Elliptic Elliptic Lens supporting
- TRM Labs TRM Transaction Monitoring supporting
-
FATF Recommendations 37–40 (as applied via R.15 Interpretive Note ¶9)in force by July 18, 2026Member jurisdictions should provide the widest possible range of international cooperation in relation to money laundering, associated predicate offenses, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing involving virtual assets. This includes mutual legal assistance, extradition, information sharing between FIUs, and supervisory cooperation between VASP supervisors. The 2025 Targeted Update identified cross-border cooperation gaps as a primary implementation risk, particularly where a VASP operates in or serves customers in a jurisdiction that has not effectively implemented R.15.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FATF Updated Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to VAs and VASPs (2021-10-28) ¶¶67–70in force by July 18, 2026Creators, owners, and operators of DeFi arrangements may qualify as VASPs where they maintain control or sufficient influence over the assets or protocol, regardless of how decentralized the arrangement is presented. FATF rejects categorical DeFi exclusions. The test focuses on the economic functions performed and the parties who exercise control, not on the labels used by the arrangement. Software developers who merely write and publish immutable protocol code without ongoing operational control generally do not meet the VASP definition. Implementation varies widely across member jurisdictions and remains a primary gap identified in the 2025 Targeted Update.
-
FATF Recommendation 15 Interpretive Note ¶3in force by July 18, 2026Member jurisdictions must require VASPs to be licensed or registered at minimum in the jurisdiction of creation (for legal persons) or place of business (for natural persons), and subject to AML/CFT supervision. Jurisdictions should take action against unlicensed or unregistered VASP activity. The specific licensing mechanism (BitLicense in NY, MSB registration in the US, MiCA CASP in the EU, PSA DPT services licensing in Singapore, HKMA stablecoin-issuer licensing, JFSA crypto-asset exchange registration) is a member-jurisdiction choice.
- GB Governing Body
-
FATF Recommendation 7 (proliferation financing); FATF R.15 IN ¶9in force by July 18, 2026Targeted financial sanctions relating to the financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (UN Security Council resolutions on DPRK and Iran) apply to VA activity. VASPs must implement without delay freezing measures against designated persons and entities, and must not deal in property or provide services to designated persons. The 2025 Targeted Update elevated proliferation-financing risk in VA as a priority FATF focus, citing DPRK-linked VA theft by state-aligned threat actors. Implementation in the US: OFAC (see ofac.ts); in the EU: EU restrictive measures (CFSP Decisions); globally: UN Security Council sanctions committees.
-
FATF Recommendation 11 (as applied via R.15 Interpretive Note ¶4)in force by July 18, 2026VASPs must retain records of transactions, CDD information, account files, and business correspondence for at least 5 years following the termination of the business relationship or the date of the occasional transaction. Records must be sufficient to permit reconstruction of individual VA transactions (including amount, type of VA, counterparty information, and time). Records must be made available to competent domestic authorities on request.
-
FATF Report to G20 on So-Called Stablecoins (2020-10-07); FATF 2021 Updated Guidance ¶¶71–76in force by July 18, 2026Stablecoins are virtual assets and therefore within R.15 scope. Central developers, governance bodies, reserve managers, and other parties who maintain control or influence over a stablecoin arrangement may qualify as VASPs. Cross-border reach stablecoins raise heightened concerns and warrant supervisory attention; the FATF recommendations apply prior to launch and continue throughout the lifecycle. Stablecoin arrangements are also subject to parallel oversight under FSB Global Stablecoin Recommendations and, for systemic arrangements, CPMI-IOSCO PFMI standards — R.15 provides the AML/CFT layer of that stack.
-
FATF Recommendation 20 (as applied via R.15 Interpretive Note ¶4)in force by July 18, 2026VASPs must report suspicious transactions to the jurisdiction's Financial Intelligence Unit. A suspicious transaction is one where the VASP suspects or has reasonable grounds to suspect that funds are the proceeds of a criminal activity, related to terrorist financing, or related to proliferation financing. The reporting obligation is operationalized in the US via BSA §5318(g) SAR; in the EU via AMLD6 / national FIU rules; in Singapore via PSA §48 STR; etc.
Vendor candidates
- Chainalysis Chainalysis KYT supporting
- TRM Labs TRM Transaction Monitoring supporting
-
FATF Updated Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to VAs and VASPs (2021-10-28) ¶¶184–197in force by July 18, 2026Transfers between VASPs and unhosted (self-hosted) wallets are expressly within R.15 scope. The 2021 Updated Guidance directs VASPs to apply a risk-based approach when sending to or receiving from unhosted wallets: identify and verify counterparty information where practicable, monitor for elevated risk indicators, and report suspicious activity. Member jurisdictions may require enhanced measures (additional verification, transaction limits, outright restriction) based on risk assessment. Note: the US has not adopted enhanced unhosted-wallet rules beyond the existing BSA framework; the EU TFR (effective 2024-12-30) imposes verification obligations for unhosted-wallet transfers above EUR 1,000.
-
FATF Recommendation 15 Interpretive Note ¶1–2 (2019-06-21); FATF R.15 (2018 update)in force by July 18, 2026A virtual asset service provider (VASP) is any natural or legal person who conducts, as a business, one or more of the following activities on behalf of another: (i) exchange between virtual assets and fiat currencies; (ii) exchange between one or more forms of virtual assets; (iii) transfer of virtual assets; (iv) safekeeping and/or administration of virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets; (v) participation in and provision of financial services related to an issuer's offer or sale of a virtual asset. A virtual asset is a digital representation of value that can be digitally traded or transferred and used for payment or investment purposes; excludes digital representations of fiat currencies, securities, and other financial assets already within FATF scope.
fatf-r16
FATF R.16
-
FATF Recommendation 16 Interpretive Note ¶7in force by July 18, 2026The beneficiary financial institution must take reasonable measures to identify wire transfers that lack required originator or beneficiary information. Such transfers should be subject to risk-based procedures for determining when to execute, reject, or suspend the transfer, and for appropriate follow-up action. The beneficiary institution must also have policies and procedures — including real-time and/or post-event monitoring where feasible — to identify suspect transfers for STR filing.
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Coinbase (TRUST coalition) Travel Rule Universal Solution Technology (TRUST) primary
- Notabene Transaction Authorization Protocol (TAP) primary
-
FATF Plenary — Updates to Standards on Recommendation 16 (2025-06-18) — Beneficiary-side rulesnot yet in forceThe 2025 revisions impose stronger beneficiary-FI obligations. Prior R.16 required beneficiary FIs only to take reasonable measures to identify missing-information transfers; the revised standard requires beneficiary FIs to actively verify incoming originator information against reliable independent data, reject transfers with demonstrably false information, and file STRs on patterns of missing-information inflows. This shifts monitoring burden to the receiving side in recognition of how cross-border ML/TF/fraud typologies have evolved. Effective in adopting jurisdictions by end of 2030.
Vendor candidates
- Coinbase (TRUST coalition) Travel Rule Universal Solution Technology (TRUST) supporting
- Notabene Transaction Authorization Protocol (TAP) supporting
-
FATF Plenary — Updates to Standards on Recommendation 16 (2025-06-18) — Confirmation of Payeenot yet in forceCross-border wire and VA transfers must include a Confirmation of Payee (CoP) verification step: the originator institution must confirm with the beneficiary institution that the named beneficiary matches the account or wallet identifier before the transfer is executed. A mismatch must be communicated to the originator, who must decide whether to proceed. CoP is intended to reduce authorized-push-payment fraud and mis-addressed transfers, and is the primary operational burden added by the 2025 revisions. Generally effective in adopting jurisdictions by end of 2030.
Vendor candidates
- Coinbase (TRUST coalition) Travel Rule Universal Solution Technology (TRUST) supporting
- Notabene Transaction Authorization Protocol (TAP) supporting
-
FATF Recommendation 16 Interpretive Note ¶5in force by July 18, 2026For cross-border wire transfers at or above USD/EUR 1,000 (the R.16 de minimis threshold), full originator and beneficiary information is required. Below that threshold, at least name and account number or unique reference is required, with verification on suspicion of ML/TF. Domestic wire transfers may carry a lighter information set where the jurisdiction provides for fast access to the remainder. The USD/EUR 1,000 threshold was retained in the June 2025 revisions.
-
FATF Plenary — Updates to Standards on Recommendation 16 (2025-06-18) — Fraud objectivesnot yet in forceR.16 objectives are expanded beyond AML/CFT to include fraud prevention, particularly authorized push payment (APP) fraud. Financial institutions and VASPs must integrate fraud detection with existing AML/CFT monitoring, share fraud-typology indicators with counterparties and supervisors, and participate in cross-border fraud intelligence exchanges where domestic law permits. This is the first time FATF has explicitly brought fraud within its scope. Effective in adopting jurisdictions by end of 2030.
-
FATF Plenary — Updates to Standards on Recommendation 16 (2025-06-18) — ISO 20022not yet in forceR.16 information requirements must be carried on ISO 20022 messaging standards for cross-border transfers, aligned with the CPMI G20 cross-border payments roadmap and the global ISO 20022 migration for correspondent banking (SWIFT MT to MX transition, coexistence period ended 2025-11-22). Structured data fields replace free-text, enabling automated sanctions/AML screening and reducing false positives. Member-jurisdiction implementation deadlines are staggered through 2030.
-
FATF Recommendation 16 Interpretive Note ¶¶5–6in force by July 18, 2026The ordering financial institution must ensure wire transfers contain required and accurate originator information and the required beneficiary information. The ordering institution must maintain records for at least five years, and must not execute wire transfers that do not meet R.16 information requirements. This obligation is transmitted down the correspondent chain: intermediary institutions must retain information received and, where unable to transmit all required information, must respond to requests from the next institution in the chain.
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Coinbase (TRUST coalition) Travel Rule Universal Solution Technology (TRUST) primary
- Notabene Transaction Authorization Protocol (TAP) primary
-
FATF Plenary — Updates to Standards on Recommendation 16 (2025-06-18) — Proliferation financingnot yet in forceR.16 objectives are explicitly extended to proliferation financing of weapons of mass destruction (aligning R.16 with R.7). Originator and beneficiary FIs and VASPs must screen all in-scope transfers against UN Security Council proliferation-financing designations, and must freeze and report without delay. The 2025 revisions elevated proliferation-financing screening from an implicit AML-program component to an explicit R.16 obligation, responding to observed exploitation of cross-border transfers by state-aligned threat actors (notably DPRK). Effective in adopting jurisdictions by end of 2030.
-
FATF Updated Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to VAs and VASPs (2021-10-28) ¶¶195–203in force by July 18, 2026For VA transfers between a VASP and an unhosted (self-hosted) wallet, the VASP must still obtain required originator or beneficiary information but need not transmit it to an unhosted-wallet counterparty. Risk-based procedures apply: VASPs should apply additional CDD measures, verify ownership of the unhosted wallet where practicable, and consider imposing transaction limits or enhanced monitoring on higher-risk unhosted-wallet flows. The 2023 EU Transfer of Funds Regulation and Singapore PSN02 impose specific verification obligations for unhosted-wallet transfers above jurisdictional thresholds; the US BSA framework does not require unhosted-wallet verification as of this review.
Vendor candidates
- Chainalysis Chainalysis KYT supporting
- Elliptic Elliptic Lens supporting
- TRM Labs TRM Transaction Monitoring supporting
-
FATF Recommendation 16 Interpretive Note ¶7(b) (2019-06-21)in force by July 18, 2026Originator and beneficiary VASPs must obtain, hold, and transmit required originator and beneficiary information for virtual-asset transfers at or above USD/EUR 1,000, and make it available to appropriate authorities on request. Required fields parallel the wire-transfer baseline: originator name, originator account (or VA wallet) reference, originator physical address (or national ID, or CIN, or date and place of birth), beneficiary name, and beneficiary account (or wallet) reference. Operationalized in the US via FinCEN 2019 Guidance FIN-2019-G001 and 31 C.F.R. § 1010.410(f); in the EU via the 2023 Transfer of Funds Regulation (EU) 2023/1113.
Vendor candidates
- Coinbase (TRUST coalition) Travel Rule Universal Solution Technology (TRUST) primary
- Notabene Transaction Authorization Protocol (TAP) primary
-
FATF Recommendation 16 (2012 Standards, as amended)in force by July 18, 2026Originator and beneficiary financial institutions must include required originator information (name, account number or unique transaction reference, address or national ID or customer identification number or date and place of birth) and beneficiary information (name and account number or unique transaction reference) in all cross-border wire transfers at or above the applicable de minimis threshold. Member countries implement via domestic wire-transfer recordkeeping and travel rules.
Vendor candidates
- Coinbase (TRUST coalition) Travel Rule Universal Solution Technology (TRUST) primary
- Notabene Transaction Authorization Protocol (TAP) primary
fdic-nprm-2026
FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026)
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(c); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iv) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iv))not yet in forceSection 4(a)(4)(A)(iv) of the GENIUS Act requires the FDIC to issue regulations implementing appropriate operational, compliance, and information technology risk management principles-based requirements and standards, including Bank Secrecy Act and sanctions compliance standards. Proposed § 350.6 addresses these requirements; the Bank Secrecy Act and sanctions compliance requirements will be addressed in detail by the joint Treasury/FinCEN/OFAC rulemaking (FR 2026-06963).
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), FR 18535; implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(B) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(B))not yet in forceThe FDIC has endeavored, in many areas, to align this proposed rule with the OCC's proposed rule, to the extent relevant. In addition to seeking comment on each of the particular provisions described below, the FDIC seeks comment on the extent to which the primary Federal payment stablecoin regulators should further align in their final rules to promote consistency of regulations applicable to all PPSIs subject to the GENIUS Act. Cross-references to the OCC NPRM (FR 2026-04089), the Federal Reserve's coordinated rulemaking, and the joint Treasury FinCEN/OFAC rulemaking (FR 2026-06963) are tracked via the watchlist.
- 2nd 2nd Line
- EA External Assurance
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.1 — "eligible financial institution"not yet in forceThe FDIC would define 'eligible financial institution' to mean either: (i) a Federal Reserve Bank; or (ii) a person that is eligible to hold reserve assets in custody under section 10(a) of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5909(a)) and that (A) complies with the applicable requirements in section 10(b), (c), and (d) of the GENIUS Act, including with applicable implementing regulations issued by the relevant primary Federal payment stablecoin regulator, primary financial regulatory agency, State bank supervisor, or State credit union supervisor; and (B) if applicable, enters into a custody agreement with a PPSI documenting the person's compliance with applicable requirements in section 10(b), (c), and (d) of the GENIUS Act, and has implemented policies and procedures to ensure compliance.
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.1 — "outstanding issuance value"not yet in forceThe FDIC would define 'outstanding issuance value' to mean the total consolidated par value of all of a PPSI's payment stablecoins issued. The definition would include the combined total par value of different brands of payment stablecoin issued by the PPSI. Outstanding issuance value anchors reserve requirements, redemption thresholds, and reporting obligations.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.1 — "significant redemption request"not yet in forceThe FDIC would define 'significant redemption request' to mean a circumstance in which aggregate redemption requests exceed 10 percent of a PPSI's outstanding issuance value within a single 24-hour period. The threshold triggers § 350.5(c) immediate FDIC notification and an opportunity to request extension of the two-business-day redemption window.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.1 — "deposit" definitionnot yet in forceThe FDIC would define 'deposit' to have the meaning as given that term in section 3(l) of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(l)). Consistent with section 4(a)(1)(A)(viii) of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(A)(viii)), the proposed rule would clarify that the term includes deposits in tokenized form. The term 'tokenized deposit' generally refers to a tokenized form of an IDI's deposit liability recorded in an on-chain or off-chain account enabled with distributed ledger technology. 'Deposit token' is more digitally native without a credit in a corresponding account. The terms 'tokenized deposit' and 'deposit token' are sometimes used interchangeably when discussing deposit tokenization; for purposes of this proposal, 'tokenized deposit' is intended to also include 'deposit token.'
- GB Governing Body
Vendor candidates
- BNY Mellon BNY Digital Cash (tokenized deposits) supporting Bank-issued tokenized deposit (not a stablecoin) — the legal-nature distinction the FDIC NPRM codifies.
- JPMorgan JPM Coin (Kinexys) supporting
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(c)not yet in forceProposed § 350.4(c) would require that reserves maintained by a PPSI are readily identified as backing outstanding payment stablecoins issued and differentiated from assets not backing payment stablecoins, particularly when the PPSI issues more than one distinguishable brand of payment stablecoin. A PPSI may issue multiple brands of distinct payment stablecoin but would be required to maintain required reserves with assets that can be separately identified as backing a particular brand of distinct payment stablecoin and each brand of payment stablecoin must independently comply with proposed § 350.4(a). If a PPSI issues more than one brand of distinct payment stablecoin, each payment stablecoin must have a segregated pool of reserves, kept, maintained, and recorded separately, unless the FDIC approves in writing that the PPSI may comingle reserves.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(h); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(3) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(3))not yet in forceProposed § 350.4(h)(1) would require PPSIs to have the information disclosed in the previous month-end report as required in proposed § 350.4(g) examined by a registered public accounting firm which will issue a written report of findings to the PPSI's audit committee, or board of directors if there is no audit committee. In addition, the PPSI shall publish the report on its website at the same time as the report under proposed § 350.4(g). Consistent with section 4(a)(3) of the GENIUS Act, proposed § 350.4(h)(2) would require the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of a PPSI, or persons performing the equivalent functions, to submit a certification of the accuracy of the monthly report to the FDIC, including a copy of the written report prepared in proposed § 350.4(h)(1). Consistent with section 4(a)(3)(C) of the GENIUS Act, any person who submits this required certification knowing that such certification is false shall be subject to the same criminal penalties as those set forth under 18 U.S.C. 1350(c).
- GB Governing Body
- EA External Assurance
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(g); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(C) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(C))not yet in forceProposed § 350.4(g) would require PPSIs to publish, for each brand of payment stablecoin issued by the PPSI, by close of business on the last day of each month, the composition of the PPSI's reserves held pursuant to proposed § 350.4(a) as of close of business of the last day of the prior month, using a format substantially similar to the template provided in table 1 to proposed § 350.4(g). The report should contain the total number of outstanding payment stablecoins issued by the PPSI, including the average tenor and geographic location of custody of each category of reserve asset. The report should contain information as of the previous month. Public disclosures are not required to include specific information on the institutions, branches, or counterparties involved in the holding of reserve assets.
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- monthly per-brand composition report per § 350.4(g) table 1 published by close of business on the last day of each month
- examination report by registered public accounting firm per § 350.4(h)(1)
- CEO/CFO certification per § 350.4(h)(2) (false certifications subject to 18 U.S.C. 1350(c) criminal penalties)
- average-tenor and geographic-location-of-custody calculation methodology documentation per § 350.4(g)
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
genius-act.monthly-reserve-disclosurein genius-act - cross-references
occ-nprm-2026.monthly-public-reserve-composition-reportin occ-nprm-2026
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), FR 18535, amendments to 12 CFR Part 330not yet in forceThe proposed rule would also amend the deposit insurance coverage rules in part 330 that apply to all FDIC-insured depository institutions by clarifying that deposits held as reserves backing a payment stablecoin would be insured to the PPSI under the FDIC's coverage rules for corporate deposits, but would not be insured to payment stablecoin holders on a pass-through basis. The FDIC has previously used this authority under section 11 of the FDI Act to issue rules providing specificity on insurance coverage; this clarification governs how reserve deposits held at IDIs interact with the standard $250,000 per-depositor account-category framework.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- customer-facing terms-and-conditions disclosing 'no pass-through FDIC coverage to stablecoin holders'
- Part 330 corporate-deposit account-titling documentation for each reserve deposit account at an IDI
- marketing-and-disclosure review log per § 350.3(b)(3)
- front-end UI scan log for any 'FDIC-insured' or 'pass-through' phrasing relative to stablecoin holdings
Vendor candidates
- BNY Mellon BNY Digital Cash (tokenized deposits) supporting
- JPMorgan JPM Coin (Kinexys) supporting
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- cross-references
occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-insurancein occ-nprm-2026
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), FR 18535, amendments to 12 CFR Part 330; implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A)(viii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(A)(viii))not yet in forceThe proposed rule would clarify the treatment of tokenized deposits under the FDI Act. The application of deposit insurance to deposits does not depend upon the technology or recordkeeping used to record an IDI's deposit liabilities — meaning that deposit insurance treatment depends on substantive deposit characteristics (depositor identification, account category, eligible-institution status), not on whether the institution maintains records through traditional ledgers, distributed-ledger technology, or other blockchain-based representations. The proposed rule would include the addition of 'tokenized' to 'deposit recorded using distributed ledger technology' to clarify deposits in tokenized form would not be a payment stablecoin.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- tokenized-deposit-vs-payment-stablecoin classification memo per § 350.1 'deposit' and 'payment stablecoin' definitions
- Part 330 account-category determination for each tokenized deposit product
- Call Report classification documentation distinguishing § 350.1 deposits from § 350.1 payment stablecoins
- customer disclosure framework explaining the deposit vs. stablecoin distinction
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- cross-references
genius-act.reserves-permitted-assetsin genius-act
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(e); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(A))not yet in forceReserve assets shall only be comprised of: (1) United States coins and currency (including Federal Reserve notes); (2) money standing to the credit of an account with a Federal Reserve Bank; (3) funds held as demand deposits or other deposits that may be withdrawn upon request at any time at an IDI or insured shares held by an insured credit union (including any foreign branches or agents, including correspondent banks, of an IDI); (4) Treasury bills, notes, or bonds with a remaining maturity of 93 days or less, or issued with a maturity of 93 days or less; (5) money received under repurchase agreements with the PPSI acting as a seller of securities and with an overnight maturity backed by Treasury bills with a maturity of 93 days or less; (6) reverse repurchase agreements with the PPSI acting as a purchaser of securities with an overnight maturity collateralized by Treasury notes, bills, or bonds on an overnight basis subject to overcollateralization in line with standard market terms, that are: (i) tri-party; (ii) centrally cleared through a clearing house registered with the SEC; or (iii) bilateral with a counterparty that the issuer has determined to be adequately creditworthy even in the event of severe market stress; and (7) securities issued by an investment company registered under section 8(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–8(a)) or other registered Government money market fund and that are invested solely in underlying assets described in (1) through (6).
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(a)(1)–(4); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(7) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(7))not yet in forceA PPSI may engage in a narrow set of core activities: (1) issue payment stablecoins; (2) redeem payment stablecoins; (3) manage reserves related to payment stablecoins, consistent with applicable Federal and State law (the management of payment stablecoin reserves includes purchasing, selling, and holding or holding under custody reserve assets); and (4) provide custodial or safekeeping services limited to certain assets — limited to the holding of payment stablecoins, required payment stablecoin reserves, or private keys of payment stablecoins. It does not include custody of non-payment stablecoin digital assets.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(a)(5)–(8); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(7)(A)(v) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(7)(A)(v))not yet in forceA PPSI may undertake supporting activities that 'directly support' core activities: (5) assessing fees associated with purchasing or redeeming payment stablecoins; (6) hosting digital wallet infrastructure using cloud platforms or on-premises air-gapped hardware security modules providing secure safekeeping of payment stablecoin private keys or other essential services; (7) acting as principal or agent with respect to any payment stablecoin and the payment of fees to facilitate customer transactions; and (8) other activities the FDIC approves as directly supporting core activities.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(8)not yet in forceProhibits a PPSI from providing credit to its customers to purchase payment stablecoins. The FDIC interprets the GENIUS Act's requirements that a PPSI maintain reserve assets comprised of a narrow set of highly liquid assets and that a PPSI engage in a narrow set of activities to be the key guardrails to ensure a PPSI is able to satisfy redemption requests. If a PPSI lends funds to customers to enable customers to purchase payment stablecoins, or were to otherwise issue payment stablecoins to customers on credit extended by the PPSI, the PPSI would then, in effect, need to access separate funding to acquire and maintain identifiable reserve assets to back the payment stablecoins issued on credit. This could result in a highly leveraged balance sheet in which the reserve assets do not provide the intended resiliency.
- GB Governing Body
- 1st 1st Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- subsidiary-PPSI credit-policy attestation prohibiting customer credit extension for stablecoin purchase
- parent-IDI-to-subsidiary credit-line review documenting absence of pass-through customer credit
- customer-facing terms-and-conditions language confirming no margin or credit purchase of payment stablecoins
- internal audit sampling of customer purchase transactions for credit-funded patterns
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- cross-references
occ-nprm-2026.scope-six-entity-typesin occ-nprm-2026
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(1); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(9) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(9))not yet in forceA PPSI may not use any combination of terms related to the United States Government, including but not limited to 'United States,' 'United States Government,' and 'USG,' in the name of a payment stablecoin, consistent with section 4(a)(9) of the GENIUS Act. The prohibition does not apply to abbreviations of currency that the PPSI is obligated to convert, redeem, or repurchase for a fixed amount of monetary value, as described in proposed § 350.3(c).
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(6); implements GENIUS Act § 4(h)(1) (12 U.S.C. 5903(h))not yet in forceProhibits a PPSI from engaging in any activity that the FDIC determines is an evasion of the requirements, standards, or prohibitions found in section 4 of the GENIUS Act or proposed Part 350.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(4); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(11) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(11))not yet in forceA PPSI is prohibited from paying the holder of any payment stablecoin any form of interest or yield (whether in cash, tokens, or other consideration) solely in connection with the holding, use, or retention of such payment stablecoin. The FDIC presumes a PPSI violates the prohibition if: (A) the PPSI has a contract, agreement, or other arrangement with an affiliate of the PPSI or related third party to pay interest or yield to the affiliate or related third party; or (B) the affiliate, related third party, or an affiliate of a related third party has a contract, agreement, or other arrangement to pay interest or yield (whether in cash, tokens, or other consideration) to a holder of any payment stablecoin issued by the PPSI solely in connection with the holding, use, or retention of such payment stablecoin; and (C) to the extent the person, or an affiliate of the person with whom the PPSI has a contract or other arrangement, is a related third party of the PPSI because the PPSI issues payment stablecoins on the related third party's behalf or under the related third party's branding. A PPSI may rebut the presumption by submitting written materials demonstrating to the FDIC's judgment that the arrangement is not prohibited and not an attempt to evade the prohibition.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- white-label / partnership-agreement inventory with affiliate and related-third-party identification
- rebuttal package per § 350.3(b)(4) for any flagged arrangement (contract, economic-substance memo, FDIC engagement record)
- marketing-and-disclosure scan log identifying 'rewards,' 'cash-back,' or 'staking' messaging
- parent IDI safety-and-soundness self-assessment incorporating subsidiary PPSI yield-program review
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
genius-act.yield-prohibitionin genius-act - cross-references
occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-interest-yieldin occ-nprm-2026
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(3); implements GENIUS Act § 4(e) (12 U.S.C. 5903(e)) and FDI Act § 18(a)(4) (12 U.S.C. 1828(a)(4), 12 CFR part 328)not yet in forceA PPSI may not directly or through implication represent that payment stablecoins are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, guaranteed by the United States Government, or subject to Federal deposit insurance or Federal share insurance. Although disclaimers may be components of complying with this requirement, the FDIC also expects PPSIs to appropriately ensure that representations, marketing materials, and disclosures are clear and consistent with this requirement to avoid direct representations or implications that are likely to cause confusion. Misrepresentation also implicates 12 CFR part 328 prohibitions on misuse of FDIC name or logo.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- marketing-and-disclosure review log per § 350.3(b)(3) with reasonable-person test documentation
- 12 CFR part 328 misuse-of-FDIC-name-or-logo compliance attestation
- Part 330 pass-through-NO disclosure incorporated into customer-onboarding flow
- front-end UI review for any 'FDIC-insured,' 'guaranteed,' or full-faith-and-credit-of-the-United-States messaging
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- cross-references
occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-insurancein occ-nprm-2026
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(2); implements GENIUS Act § 4(e)(2) (12 U.S.C. 5903(e)(2))not yet in forceA PPSI is prohibited from marketing a payment stablecoin in a manner that a reasonable person would perceive the payment stablecoin to be legal tender, issued by the United States, or guaranteed or approved by the United States Government.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(5); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(2) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(2))not yet in forceA PPSI is prohibited from pledging, rehypothecating, or reusing any reserve assets required under § 350.4(a) and (e), including directly or through a third party custodian of the reserve assets, except for the exceptions described in proposed § 350.3(b)(5)(i) through (iii) consistent with section 4(a)(2) of the GENIUS Act. A PPSI may only pledge, rehypothecate, or re-use any reserve assets for the purpose of: (i) satisfying margin obligations in connection with investments in required reserves under proposed § 350.4(e)(5) or (6); (ii) satisfying obligations associated with the use, receipt, or provision of standard custodial services; or (iii) creating liquidity to meet reasonable expectations of requests to redeem payment stablecoins, such that reserves in the form of Treasury bills with a maturity of 93 days or less may be sold as purchased securities in repurchase agreements that either: (A) the repurchase agreements are cleared by a clearing agency registered with the SEC; or (B) the PPSI receives prior written approval from the FDIC.
- GB Governing Body
- 1st 1st Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- custody-agreement clauses prohibiting custodian, sub-custodian, and affiliate rehypothecation per § 350.3(b)(5)
- repurchase-agreement clearing-status log (SEC-registered clearing agency or prior FDIC written approval)
- Treasury-bill remaining-maturity log demonstrating ≤93 days at sale per repo
- monthly attestation that repurchase proceeds were used solely to meet redemption requests
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
genius-act.reserves-rehypothecation-banin genius-act - cross-references
occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-rehypothecationin occ-nprm-2026
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(7); implements GENIUS Act § 4(e)(3)(A) (12 U.S.C. 5903(e)(3)(A))not yet in forceProhibits a PPSI from marketing a product in the United States as a payment stablecoin, or from issuing a payment stablecoin, unless the product or payment stablecoin is issued in compliance with the GENIUS Act and Part 350. The FDIC will monitor FDIC-supervised PPSIs' marketing, as appropriate, to ensure they do not violate the GENIUS Act or Part 350 of the proposed rule, and for referral to the Department of Treasury for possible violation of section 4(e)(3)(A) of the GENIUS Act.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.7not yet in forceReserve assets will be recorded on the PPSI's balance sheet under GAAP and included in the quarterly reports required under proposed § 350.7 and on Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call Reports) for the parent IDI. Standardizing these reporting requirements will enhance the FDIC's ability to supervise PPSIs and provide clarity as to the information a PPSI must report.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(d)not yet in forceProposed § 350.5(d)(1) would provide that a PPSI must also publicly, clearly, and conspicuously disclose in plain language and in a format that is readily noticeable, readily understandable, and segregated from other information: (i) the name of the PPSI that issues the brand of payment stablecoin; (ii) that the PPSI is the entity that is obligated to convert, redeem, or repurchase the payment stablecoin for a fixed amount of monetary value; (iii) the link to the monthly composition report of the relevant PPSI's reserves required under § 350.4(g); and (iv) all fees associated with purchasing or redeeming payment stablecoins. Updates to the disclosures require at least seven calendar days' prior notice.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(a)not yet in forceA PPSI must publicly disclose its redemption policy. Proposed § 350.5(a)(1) requires the PPSI to disclose the timeframe in which the PPSI will redeem payment stablecoins issued by the PPSI for a fixed amount of monetary value and the timeframe under proposed § 350.5(b)(1). Proposed § 350.5(a)(2) would require the PPSI to include the statement that any discretionary limitations on timely redemptions can only be imposed by the FDIC. Proposed § 350.5(a)(3) requires the PPSI to explain when the redemption period may be extended. Proposed § 350.5(a)(4) requires the PPSI to provide a statement with clear instructions on how a payment stablecoin holder can redeem a payment stablecoin. Under proposed § 350.5(a)(5), the PPSI must disclose the minimum number of payment stablecoins that it will redeem; this minimum may not be greater than one payment stablecoin.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(b); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(B) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(B))not yet in forceA PPSI must have a payment stablecoin redemption policy with clear and conspicuous procedures for timely redemption of outstanding payment stablecoins. The FDIC is proposing to define 'timely' to mean that a PPSI shall redeem a payment stablecoin no later than two business days following the date of the requested redemption in proposed § 350.5(b)(1). Under the proposal, two business days would be the maximum amount of time a PPSI could choose to redeem payment stablecoins, but a PPSI could choose a shorter time period. Consistent with the Act, the FDIC is proposing that discretionary limitations on timely redemptions can only be imposed by the FDIC.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(a); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(A))not yet in forceProposed § 350.4(a)(1) would require the PPSI to maintain identifiable reserves fully backing the outstanding payment stablecoins of the PPSI, the reserve asset value of which must at all times meet or exceed the total outstanding issuance value of payment stablecoins issued by the PPSI. To maintain 'identifiable reserves,' the PPSI shall maintain appropriate records to identify required reserve assets underlying a particular payment stablecoin. Reserve assets will be recorded on the PPSI's balance sheet under GAAP and included in the quarterly reports required under proposed § 350.7 and on Call Report for the parent IDI. Proposed § 350.4(a)(2) requires the PPSI to monitor the issuance and redemption of payment stablecoins to ensure compliance. Proposed § 350.4(a)(3) requires the PPSI to maintain reserves directly or maintain them in the custody of an eligible financial institution.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- GAAP-conformant reserve-asset record on PPSI balance sheet incorporated into parent IDI Call Report
- intra-day reserve monitoring system per § 350.4(a)(2) with end-of-day reconciliation
- custody agreement with eligible financial institution per § 350.1 and § 350.4(a)(3)
- Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer monthly certification per § 350.4(h)(2)
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
genius-act.reserves-1-to-1in genius-act - cross-references
occ-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-segregationin occ-nprm-2026
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(b)not yet in forceFor purposes of calculating the reserve asset value of the reserve assets backing each outstanding payment stablecoin issued by the PPSI, reserve assets shall be valued at fair value, with the exceptions of United States coins and currency which shall be valued at face value. Valuing reserve assets at fair value would result in reserve assets reflecting market prices at that time and ensure that the PPSI has sufficient reserves to meet redemption requests at par value. U.S. coins include those minted of precious metals such as gold and silver; valuing coins at fair rather than par value could lead to gold or silver, in coin form, backing payment stablecoins, which the FDIC believes is not consistent with Congressional intent.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(d)not yet in forceRequires a PPSI to demonstrate the operational capability to access and monetize reserve assets, commensurate with the PPSI's risk profile and business model. The PPSI must be able to monetize the reserve assets, potentially quickly and at short notice, to meet redemption requests. Smaller, less complex PPSIs may demonstrate monetization capability by establishing arrangements with counterparties through which it can quickly sell reserve assets at fair value. A PPSI could also demonstrate an arrangement with its parent IDI that would provide funding through purchases of the PPSI's reserves. PPSIs would likely regularly monetize reserve assets in the ordinary course of business and should be able to demonstrate on a regular basis that the PPSI has adequate monetization channels.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(f); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iii))not yet in forceProposed § 350.4(f) would require that a PPSI limit its total counterparty exposure to any one eligible financial institution, regardless of type of reserve asset, to no more than 40 percent of its reserve assets across all brands of payment stablecoins issued by the PPSI. The PPSI should take into account exposure across all of an eligible financial institution's parents, subsidiaries, or affiliates. The FDIC selected 40 percent so no single eligible financial institution custodies a majority of the PPSI's reserve assets.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(i)not yet in forceProposed § 350.4(i)(1) provides that a PPSI shall notify the FDIC in writing when the PPSI determines or has reasonable grounds to suspect that the aggregate fair value of identified reserves backing any of the PPSI's outstanding payment stablecoins is less than the amount required under proposed § 350.4(a). Proposed § 350.4(i)(1) would also provide that, upon notification by a PPSI that identified reserves have fallen below the amount required under proposed § 350.4(a), the FDIC in its sole discretion may take any of the steps described in: (i) direct the PPSI to suspend or reduce issuance of a payment stablecoin until the aggregate fair value of identifiable reserves backing the brand of payment stablecoins exceeds the outstanding issuance value of the particular payment stablecoin; (ii) direct the PPSI to take measures to increase the aggregate value of identifiable reserves until the aggregate value of identifiable reserves backing outstanding payment stablecoins exceeds the value of outstanding payment stablecoins; or (iii) direct the PPSI to begin orderly redemption of the payment stablecoin in light of exigent circumstances.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- intra-day reserve-fair-value reconciliation system with reasonable-grounds-to-suspect escalation procedure
- FDIC notification template per § 350.4(i)(1) with sign-off chain
- restoration-plan-trigger thresholds and pre-arranged funding sources per § 350.4(j)
- parent-IDI capital-and-liquidity coordination memo per § 350.6(a)(7)
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- cross-references
occ-nprm-2026.reserve-shortfall-consequencesin occ-nprm-2026
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(j)not yet in forceProposed § 350.4(j) would require PPSIs to maintain a written contingency plan describing the measures that it will take to restore compliance with the requirements in proposed §§ 350.4(a)(1) or (e) or § 350.9 if the PPSI is not meeting those requirements. The plan would include reserve monitoring systems that would trigger alerts to the PPSI when falling below specific thresholds, actions the PPSI will take as fair-value reserves fall below specific thresholds, and delineate immediate steps the PPSI shall take. Pre-arranged funding sources and responsible staff with authority to decide what steps the PPSI shall take to comply with proposed §§ 350.4(a) and 350.9 should be designated.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(4)not yet in forceRequires a PPSI's asset growth to be commensurate with risk management and operational capabilities. The proposal does not establish limits on asset growth rates or the overall size of a PPSI but is intended to ensure that the growth of assets is managed prudently and that management maintains risk management and operational capabilities.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(5)not yet in forceProposed § 350.6(a)(5) addresses insider and affiliate transactions and is intended to add to the protection of the assets and resources of a PPSI from misuse for the benefit of insiders, affiliates, or related entities. Under proposed § 350.6(a)(5)(i), a PPSI would be required to ensure that transactions between or among the PPSI and insiders or affiliates (other than the parent IDI of which it is a subsidiary): (A) do not pose significant risks of material financial loss to the PPSI; and (B) are conducted on terms that are the same as or at least as favorable to the PPSI as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with or involving non-insiders or non-affiliates.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(3); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iii))not yet in forceA PPSI must manage interest rate risk in a manner that is appropriate to the size and complexity of the PPSI and the complexity of its assets and liabilities. Although the reserve composition requirements proposed under proposed § 350.4(e) limit reserve assets to those that generally have limited duration or no duration (e.g., funds held as demand deposits), PPSIs should understand the impact that changes in interest rates, particularly increases in interest rates over short-time periods, may have on the fair value and monetization of interest-sensitive reserve assets.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(2)not yet in forcePPSIs must have an internal audit system that is appropriate to the size and complexity of the PPSI and the nature, scope, and risk of its activities and that provides for: (i) adequate monitoring of the system of internal controls through an internal audit function (or, for a PPSI whose size, complexity or scope of operations does not warrant a full scale internal audit function, a system of independent reviews of key internal controls); (ii) independence and objectivity; (iii) qualified persons; (iv) adequate independent testing and review of internal controls and information systems; (v) adequate documentation of tests and findings and any corrective actions; and (vi) verification and review of management actions to address deficiencies.
- 2nd 2nd Line
- 3rd 3rd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(1); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iii)–(iv) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iii)–(iv))not yet in forceProposed § 350.6(a)(1) would require a PPSI to have internal controls and information systems that are appropriate for the size and complexity of the PPSI and the nature, scope, and risk of its activities and that provide for: (i) an organizational structure that establishes clear lines of authority and responsibility for monitoring adherence to established policies; (ii) effective risk assessment; (iii) timely and accurate financial, operational, and regulatory reporting; (iv) adequate procedures to monitor, safeguard, manage, and control assets, including reserve assets; and (v) compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The standards are adapted from 12 CFR part 364, Appendix A.
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Fireblocks Fireblocks Policy Engine (Transaction Authorization Policy) supporting
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(b); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iv) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iv))not yet in forceSection 4(a)(4)(A)(iv) of the GENIUS Act directs the FDIC to establish appropriate information technology risk management principles-based requirements and standards that are tailored to a PPSI's business model and risk profile, and consistent with applicable law. Proposed § 350.6(b) sets forth such principles-based information technology risk management standards, including a comprehensive written information security risk and control framework, an inventory and classification of assets and processes, controls supporting and safeguarding sensitive information, evaluation/validation/reporting processes including for smart contracts, periodic independent testing, comprehensive incident-identification and response, administrative/technical/physical safeguards over nonpublic personal customer information, and measures to ensure secure handling of digital assets including private-key management, backup, and recovery.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- board-approved IT/security framework per § 350.6(b)
- smart-contract validation and independent testing report
- private-key management procedures with backup/recovery testing logs
- joint-statement-on-crypto-asset-safekeeping (July 14, 2025) alignment memo
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- cross-references
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-program-generalin treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026 - cross-references
occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-information-tech-securityin occ-nprm-2026 - cross-references
ofac.sdn-screeningin ofac
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(7); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(ii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(ii))not yet in forceA PPSI must: (i) appropriately monitor and validate compliance with the requirements of proposed § 350.4; and (ii) manage liquidity risk in a manner that is appropriate to the business model and risk profile of the PPSI. Appropriate monitoring and management of liquidity is integral to the operations of a PPSI and its ability to facilitate the timely redemption of payment stablecoins and adhere to the requirements under proposed § 350.4.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(6)not yet in forceA PPSI must: (i) exercise appropriate due diligence in selecting its service providers; (ii) require its service providers by contract to implement appropriate measures designed to meet the requirements of proposed Part 350; and (iii) as appropriate, monitor its service providers to confirm they have satisfied their obligations under proposed Part 350. Appropriate due diligence provides PPSIs with the information needed to evaluate whether third-party service providers can perform as expected and whether risks associated with the relationship can be adequately identified, monitored, and controlled.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.0not yet in forceProposed § 350.0(a) describes the purpose of subpart A: to implement the GENIUS Act, 12 U.S.C. 5901 et seq., with respect to entities for which the FDIC is authorized to issue regulations under the Act. Proposed § 350.0(b) provides that proposed Part 350 subpart A applies to all PPSIs for which the FDIC is the primary Federal payment stablecoin regulator — namely subsidiaries of insured State nonmember banks and State savings associations approved to issue payment stablecoins (collectively, 'FDIC-supervised PPSIs'). Subpart B applies to FDIC-supervised custodians.
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.2not yet in forceProvisions of proposed Part 350 are separate and severable from one another. In the event a court stays a particular provision or determines any provision is invalid, the FDIC intends that the remaining provisions shall continue in effect.
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(c)not yet in forceProposed § 350.5(c) would provide that the PPSI must notify the FDIC immediately if it receives redemption requests that exceed 10 percent of its outstanding issuance value within a 24-hour period, which the FDIC defines as a 'significant redemption request.' Upon the 10 percent threshold being crossed, rather than waiting until the end of the 24-hour period, the PPSI may request that the FDIC grant the PPSI approval to extend the redemption time period beyond the required two business days. The FDIC may also request the PPSI to provide a specific time period by which it expects to be able to satisfy all of the redemption requests and, if appropriate, whether it is at risk of potentially not satisfying requirements in proposed § 350.4(i) or plans to implement the measures in proposed § 350.4(j). The FDIC in its sole discretion may choose to grant or deny the request for extension or grant a different amount of time than one requested by the PPSI.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR Part 350, Subpart B; implements GENIUS Act § 10 (12 U.S.C. 5909)not yet in forceSubpart B applies to FDIC-supervised custodians — national banks, FSAs, Federal branches, or PPSIs that provide custody or safekeeping services for covered assets (payment stablecoin reserves, payment stablecoins used as collateral, or private keys used to issue payment stablecoins). The FDIC-supervised custodian must separately account for the covered assets of each covered customer, treat and deal with those covered assets as belonging to the covered customer and not as the property of the custodian, and take appropriate steps to protect covered assets from claims of creditors of the custodian and any sub-custodian, including through written policies, procedures, and internal controls.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
fsb-gsc
FSB GSC
-
FSB High-Level Recommendation 1 (2023-07-17)in force by July 18, 2026Authorities should have and utilise the necessary powers and tools, and adequate resources, to comprehensively regulate, supervise, and oversee a GSC arrangement and its multi-functional activities and risks, and to enforce relevant laws and regulations effectively. Where necessary, authorities should close gaps in their legal and regulatory frameworks.
- EA External Assurance
-
FSB High-Level Recommendation 10 (2023-07-17)in force by July 18, 2026Authorities should ensure that a GSC arrangement meets all applicable regulatory, supervisory, and oversight requirements of a particular jurisdiction before commencing any operations in that jurisdiction, and adapts to new regulatory requirements as necessary. Launch should be conditional on regulatory readiness, not retrospective. Where a GSC would be used as a means of payment at scale, the authority should additionally consider conditions specific to payment systems (finality, access, operational reliability, competition).
-
FSB High-Level Recommendation 2 (2023-07-17)in force by July 18, 2026Authorities should apply comprehensive and effective regulation, supervision, and oversight to a GSC arrangement proportionate to the financial stability risk it poses, following the principle of 'same activity, same risk, same regulation.' Regulatory treatment should be functional and activity-based, covering all functions performed by the GSC arrangement, including issuance, transfer, custody, reserve management, validation, and governance.
-
FSB High-Level Recommendation 3 (2023-07-17)in force by July 18, 2026Authorities should cooperate and coordinate with each other, both domestically and internationally, and share information with each other as necessary, to foster efficient and effective communication and consultation in order to support each other in fulfilling their respective mandates, and to encourage consistency of regulatory and supervisory outcomes. Supervisory colleges should be established for GSCs of global systemic significance.
-
FSB High-Level Recommendation 4 (2023-07-17)in force by July 18, 2026Authorities should require that GSC arrangements have in place a comprehensive governance framework with a clear allocation of accountability for the functions and activities within the GSC arrangement. The framework should be proportionate to the risks posed. It should cover decentralised operations and any governance body or persons that may exercise control, and should address conflicts of interest where a single entity or closely related entities control multiple functions.
- GB Governing Body
-
FSB High-Level Recommendation 5 (2023-07-17)in force by July 18, 2026Authorities should require that GSC arrangements have effective risk management frameworks in place, especially with regard to reserve management (including safeguarding of assets), operational resilience (including cybersecurity safeguards), AML/CFT measures, and 'fit and proper' requirements on officers and owners. Risk management should be embedded in policies, procedures, systems, controls, and the governance structure.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FSB High-Level Recommendation 6 (2023-07-17)in force by July 18, 2026Authorities should require that GSC arrangements have in place robust systems for collecting, storing, and safeguarding data. Authorities should have timely access to data necessary to fulfil their regulatory, supervisory, and oversight mandates, including across borders. GSCs must accommodate cross-border data access requirements without compromising data protection or privacy obligations in host jurisdictions.
-
FSB High-Level Recommendation 7 (2023-07-17)in force by July 18, 2026Authorities should require that GSC arrangements have appropriate recovery and resolution plans in place. Recovery planning should enable the arrangement to continue to operate through stress. Resolution planning should enable critical functions to continue, or to wind down in an orderly manner, without severe systemic disruption and without exposing taxpayers to loss. Plans must be tested and reviewed regularly.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FSB High-Level Recommendation 8 (2023-07-17)in force by July 18, 2026Authorities should require that GSC arrangements provide to users and relevant stakeholders comprehensive and transparent information, including on the governance framework, redemption rights, reserve composition and management, operation of the stabilisation mechanism, third-party service providers, and risks. Information must be clear, accurate, and readily accessible.
-
FSB High-Level Recommendation 9 (2023-07-17)in force by July 18, 2026Authorities should require that GSC arrangements provide a robust legal claim and redemption rights against the issuer or reserve assets, with redemption honored at par in the referenced fiat currency under all market conditions. Authorities should require prudential requirements (capital, liquidity, reserve composition) commensurate with the stability and redemption guarantees the arrangement provides. Algorithmic stablecoins without a reserve backing and without a legal claim are not consistent with this recommendation.
genius-act
GENIUS Act
-
GENIUS Act §6(b); Public Law 119-27not yet in forcePPSIs with more than $50 billion in outstanding stablecoins must submit audited annual financial statements.
- EA External Assurance
-
GENIUS Act §7; 11 U.S.C. amended; Public Law 119-27not yet in forceAmends Title 11 of the U.S. Code so that reserve assets maintained by a PPSI to back payment stablecoins are not property of the bankruptcy estate, preserving reserves for stablecoin holders rather than general unsecured creditors.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Circle USDC supporting
-
GENIUS Act §11(b); Public Law 119-27not yet in forceCustodial and safekeeping services for payment stablecoin reserves, payment stablecoins used as collateral, or private keys used to issue permitted payment stablecoins may only be performed by entities subject to federal or state banking-regulator oversight.
- 2nd 2nd Line
- EA External Assurance
-
GENIUS Act §11(a); Public Law 119-27not yet in forceThree years after enactment (from 2028-07-18), digital asset service providers may not offer, sell, or make available in the United States any payment stablecoin that is not issued by a PPSI or an authorized foreign issuer. Definition of DAPS excludes distributed-ledger protocols, development, immutable or self-custodial wallet interfaces, and liquidity-pool participation.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
GENIUS Act §3(a); Public Law 119-27not yet in forceProhibits any person other than a permitted payment stablecoin issuer (PPSI) or an authorized foreign issuer from issuing a payment stablecoin in the United States.
- GB Governing Body
Vendor candidates
- Circle USDC primary
-
GENIUS Act §6(a); Public Law 119-27not yet in forceMonthly public disclosure of the composition of reserves, certified by issuer executives and examined by a registered public accounting firm.
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Circle USDC primary Monthly reserve composition disclosed in the Deloitte attestation.
- Paxos USDP (Paxos USD) primary
-
GENIUS Act §4; Public Law 119-27not yet in forceEstablishes three permitted issuer classes: (1) subsidiaries of insured depository institutions supervised by a federal banking agency (OCC/FDIC/Fed), (2) nonbank federal qualified payment stablecoin issuers supervised by the OCC, and (3) state-qualified PPSIs under a substantially similar state regime.
- GB Governing Body
Vendor candidates
- Circle USDC primary
- Paxos USDP (Paxos USD) primary Paxos issues under NYDFS Limited Purpose Trust plus OCC national-trust-bank charter.
- Ripple Labs · Standard Custody & Trust Company LLC Ripple USD (RLUSD) supporting PPSI status under GENIUS § 4 depends on Standard Custody's federal election; NYDFS limited-purpose trust charter is the current issuer-level supervisor — VERIFY current federal classification.
- Stripe (Bridge, acquired late 2024) Stripe Bridge / Bridge Open Issuance supporting PPSI status under GENIUS § 4 depends on the post-Stripe-acquisition Bridge legal structuring and federal election — VERIFY current issuer entity and regulatory perimeter at cutoff.
-
GENIUS Act §6(c); Public Law 119-27not yet in forceIssuers must establish and publicly disclose redemption procedures.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Circle USDC primary
- Paxos USDP (Paxos USD) primary
-
GENIUS Act §4(a)(1)(A); Public Law 119-27not yet in forceRequires PPSIs to maintain reserves backing outstanding payment stablecoins on at least a one-to-one basis.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Circle USDC primary
- Paxos USDP (Paxos USD) primary
-
GENIUS Act §4(a)(1)(B); Public Law 119-27not yet in forceReserves may consist only of: (i) U.S. coins and Federal Reserve notes; (ii) demand deposits at insured depository institutions (including regulated foreign banks); (iii) Treasury bills, notes, or bonds with remaining maturity ≤ 93 days; (iv) repurchase/reverse-repurchase agreements backed by such Treasuries; (v) money market funds invested solely in the foregoing; (vi) central bank reserve deposits.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- monthly reserve composition attestation (AICPA Digital Assets practice aid)
- custody confirmation letters from reserve custodians
- Treasury maturity ladder showing all positions ≤93 days
- tri-party repo collateral attestations
Vendor candidates
- Circle USDC primary Reserves held in cash and short-dated U.S. Treasuries; monthly attestation by Deloitte under the AICPA Digital Assets practice aid.
- Paxos USDP (Paxos USD) primary
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- cross-references
basel-sco60.hqla-treatmentin basel-sco60
-
GENIUS Act §4(a)(1)(C); Public Law 119-27not yet in forceProhibits rehypothecation of reserve assets except to create liquidity to meet reasonable redemption expectations. Treasury-bill short-term repo permitted via approved CCP or with prior regulator approval.
- 1st 1st Line
Vendor candidates
- Circle USDC primary
- Paxos USDP (Paxos USD) primary
-
GENIUS Act §17; Public Law 119-27in force by July 18, 2026A payment stablecoin issued by a permitted payment stablecoin issuer (PPSI) is NOT a 'security' under the Securities Act of 1933 §2(a)(1), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 §3(a)(10), the Investment Company Act of 1940 §2(a)(36), or the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 §202(a)(18); is NOT a 'commodity' under the Commodity Exchange Act §1a(9); and is NOT a 'security' or 'commodity' for any other purpose under the federal securities or commodities laws. The carve-out applies only to payment stablecoins as defined in the Act AND only when issued by a PPSI — algorithmic stablecoins, multi-asset-referenced stablecoins, and unauthorized issuers remain subject to whatever classification the SEC, CFTC, or the courts otherwise determine. The exclusion does not extend to Title 26 (Internal Revenue Code) treatment; tax classification is governed separately and is captured in `irs-1099-da.ts`.
- GB Governing Body
-
GENIUS Act §10; Public Law 119-27in force by July 18, 2026Directs Treasury to promulgate BSA, AML, and OFAC-related rules for PPSIs in coordination with the primary federal payment stablecoin regulators. Separate rulemaking track from OCC's prudential rules (12 CFR Part 15).
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
GENIUS Act §8; Public Law 119-27not yet in forceProhibits PPSIs and authorized foreign payment stablecoin issuers from paying any form of interest or yield to holders solely in connection with the holding, use, or retention of a payment stablecoin.
- GB Governing Body
Vendor candidates
- Circle USDC primary USDC pays no yield or interest to holders.
- Paxos USDP (Paxos USD) primary USDP pays no yield to holders.
irs-1099-da
IRS Form 1099-DA
-
26 C.F.R. § 1.6045-1(d)(2); IRC §6045(g)in force by July 18, 2026For digital-asset 'covered securities' acquired after 2025-12-31 in a custodial account, brokers must additionally report adjusted cost basis and holding-period classification (long-term / short-term) on Form 1099-DA. Basis reporting is required beginning for transactions effected on or after 2026-01-01. Digital assets acquired before 2026 or transferred in from external sources remain noncovered (no basis reporting required).
-
26 C.F.R. § 1.6045-1(a)(1); IRC §6045(c)in force by July 18, 2026A 'broker' includes any person that effects sales of digital assets for customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business, including: operators of custodial digital-asset trading platforms (centralized exchanges), certain hosted wallet providers, digital-asset kiosk operators, and certain processors of digital-asset payments (PDAPs). Non-custodial DeFi front-end operators were addressed in a separate December 2024 final rule currently under legal challenge; not modeled here.
-
IRC §6045(b); 26 C.F.R. § 1.6045-1(k)in force by July 18, 2026Brokers must furnish payee statements (generally the customer-facing copy of Form 1099-DA) to each customer by January 31 of the year following the reportable transactions. Statement includes gross proceeds and, for 2026-and-later transactions on covered securities, basis and holding-period information.
-
IRS Notice 2024-56 (transition relief for 2025 broker reporting)in force by July 18, 2026The IRS will not impose penalties for failure to file correct Forms 1099-DA or furnish correct payee statements for the 2025 tax year if the broker makes a good-faith effort to comply. Relief applies only to 2025 digital-asset transactions reported in early 2026. Does not extend to 2026 transactions (basis-reporting-effective year).
-
26 C.F.R. § 1.6045-1(d); IRC §6045(g)(3)(B)(iv)in force by July 18, 2026Brokers must report gross proceeds from sales and exchanges of digital assets effected on or after 2025-01-01. Reporting is on Form 1099-DA, filed with the IRS and furnished to the customer as a payee statement. Covers sales for cash, exchanges for property or services, and certain stablecoin-for-digital-asset exchanges.
-
26 C.F.R. § 1.6045A-1 (as applied to digital assets); IRC §6045Ain force by July 18, 2026Brokers transferring a customer's digital-asset covered securities to another broker must provide a transfer statement containing acquisition date, cost basis, and other information required to facilitate subsequent basis reporting. Applies post-basis-effective-date (2026-01-01).
occ-nprm-2026
OCC PPSI NPRM (2026)
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(l); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(10) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(10))not yet in forceSection 4(a)(10) of the GENIUS Act requires that a PPSI with more than $50 billion in consolidated total outstanding issuance value that is not subject to certain reporting requirements under Federal securities laws prepare an annual financial statement audited by a PCAOB-registered public accounting firm in accordance with auditing standards adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Section 4(a)(10) further provides that the audited annual financial statement must be made publicly available on the PPSI's website and be submitted annually to the primary Federal payment stablecoin regulator. Under proposed § 15.14(l)(2), the audited financial statement is due within 120 days of fiscal year-end.
- EA External Assurance
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(m); cross-references 12 CFR 5.50not yet in forceA person seeking to acquire control of a PPSI must follow the requirements of 12 CFR 5.50 as if the PPSI were a national bank. Under 12 CFR 5.50, a person seeking to acquire control must provide 60 days' prior notice to the OCC. If the OCC has not disapproved the acquisition within 60 days, the acquirer may proceed. Acquisition without following 12 CFR 5.50 requires the new controlling person to submit all information required under 12 CFR 5.50 within 15 calendar days and exposes the PPSI to supervisory or enforcement actions.
- GB Governing Body
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.21; implements GENIUS Act § 10 (12 U.S.C. 5909)not yet in forceA covered custodian (a national bank, Federal savings association, Federal branch, or PPSI providing custody for covered assets — payment stablecoin reserves, payment stablecoins used as collateral, or private keys used to issue payment stablecoins) must (a) separately account for the covered assets of each covered customer and treat and deal with those covered assets as belonging to the covered customer and not as the property of the covered custodian; and (b) take appropriate steps to protect the covered assets of covered customers from the claims of creditors of the covered custodian and any sub-custodian, including through adopting, implementing, and maintaining written policies, procedures, and internal controls.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.41(a)(1)(i)(B); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(i) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(i))not yet in forceThe OCC is proposing a floor of $5 million on the minimum capital requirement during the 'de novo period' — generally the three-year period following chartering or licensing by the OCC of the PPSI to issue stablecoins under proposed Part 15 (or, for SQPPSIs transitioning to the OCC's regulatory framework, three years from transition). The floor is primarily intended to ensure that every PPSI has sufficient resources to support initial operations, particularly to cover the losses that are expected to occur early in the startup phase of a new stablecoin. OCC experience with chartering de novo national trust banks providing stablecoin programs has shown minimum capital amounts ranging from $6.05 million to $25 million.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.2 — "Eligible financial institution"not yet in forceDefines 'eligible financial institution' to mean (1) a person that (a) is eligible to hold reserve assets in custody under section 10(a) of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5909(a)); (b) complies with the applicable requirements in section 10(b), (c), and (d) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 5909(b), (c), and (d)) and any applicable implementing regulations issued by a relevant Federal payment stablecoin regulator, primary financial regulatory agency, State bank supervisor, or State credit union supervisor; and (c) if applicable, enters into a custody agreement with a PPSI documenting compliance and policies and procedures; or (2) a Federal Reserve Bank. The definition anchors the reserve-asset diversification and concentration requirements at proposed § 15.11(c).
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.2 — "Federal qualified payment stablecoin issuer"not yet in forceDefines 'Federal qualified payment stablecoin issuer' (FQPPSI) — consistent with GENIUS Act 12 U.S.C. 5901(11) — to mean the following entities that are approved by the OCC, pursuant to proposed § 15.30, to issue payment stablecoins: (1) a nonbank entity, other than a State qualified payment stablecoin issuer; (2) an uninsured national bank that is chartered by the OCC pursuant to title LXII of the Revised Statutes; or (3) a Federal branch.
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.2 — "Outstanding issuance value"not yet in forceDefines 'outstanding issuance value' to mean the total consolidated par value of all of a PPSI's payment stablecoins, including the combined total par value of different brands of payment stablecoin issued by the PPSI (e.g., under a white-label arrangement). The definition is limited to stablecoins issued by the PPSI and consolidated subsidiaries and excludes those of non-consolidated affiliates. Outstanding issuance value anchors reserve-asset 1:1 backing (§ 15.11), examination cadence (§ 15.14), and minimum capital calculation (§ 15.41).
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.2 — "State qualified payment stablecoin issuer"not yet in forceDefines 'State qualified payment stablecoin issuer' (SQPPSI) — consistent with GENIUS Act 12 U.S.C. 5901(31) and the OCC's proposed clarification — to mean an entity that is (1) legally established under the laws of a State and approved to issue payment stablecoins by a State payment stablecoin regulator; and (2) not an uninsured national bank chartered by the OCC pursuant to title LXII of the Revised Statutes, a Federal branch, an insured depository institution, or a subsidiary of such an uninsured national bank, Federal branch, or insured depository institution.
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(6); implements GENIUS Act § 4(h)(1) (12 U.S.C. 5903(h)(1))not yet in forceA PPSI must not engage in any activity that the OCC determines is an evasion of the requirements of section 4 of the GENIUS Act or Part 15. Section 4(h)(1) authorizes the OCC to issue regulations to 'carry out the requirements of this section . . . and to prevent evasion thereof.'
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(a)–(d); implements GENIUS Act § 6(a)(3) and § 6(a)(4)(C) (12 U.S.C. 5905(a)(3), 5905(a)(4)(C))not yet in forceThe OCC will conduct a full-scope examination of every PPSI subject to its supervision at least once during each 12-month period, unless otherwise specified in proposed § 15.14(d). A full-scope examination refers to the comprehensive review of the PPSI's financial condition, risk management practices, compliance with laws and regulations, and overall safety and soundness. Section 15.14(d) provides the OCC with the option to examine some PPSIs on an 18- to 36-month cycle if (1) the PPSI is not currently subject to a formal enforcement proceeding or order; (2) no person acquired control during the preceding 12-month period in which a full-scope examination would have been required; (3) the PPSI has an outstanding issuance value of less than $1 billion or less than $25 billion in total monthly trading volume; and (4) the PPSI is in compliance with all reserve requirements (§ 15.11) and reporting requirements (§ 15.14).
- 2nd 2nd Line
- EA External Assurance
Evidence the attestor samples
- complete set of books and records in English per § 15.14(f)
- examiner-access governance protocol per § 15.14(b)
- quarterly Call-Report-equivalent submissions per § 15.14(i) within 30 days of quarter-end
- weekly confidential blockchain-level reporting submission per § 15.14(h)
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
genius-act.permitted-issuer-classesin genius-act
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(d)not yet in forceA PPSI with an outstanding issuance value of $25 billion or more must, on each business day, maintain at least 0.5 percent of its reserve assets in the form of insured deposits or insured shares at an insured depository institution, up to a cap of $500 million. The floor is intended to spread reserves across the depository system and reassure stablecoin holders by ensuring some portion of reserves is in FDIC/NCUA-insured form (recognizing the $250,000 per-depositor coverage limit constrains the aggregate insured percentage).
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(f); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(3)(C) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(3)(C))not yet in forceProposed § 15.11(f)(1) requires the examination of the previous month-end report to occur by noon on the last day of each month and the report to be published on the PPSI's website at the same time as the monthly report required under § 15.11(e). Proposed § 15.11(f)(2) requires the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (or persons performing the equivalent functions) of the PPSI to submit a certification as to the accuracy of the monthly report to the OCC; any person who submits this required certification knowing that such certification is false shall be subject to the same criminal penalties as those set forth under 18 U.S.C. 1350(c).
- GB Governing Body
- EA External Assurance
Vendor candidates
- Circle USDC primary Deloitte attestation supports CFO sign-off cadence.
- Paxos USDP (Paxos USD) primary
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(e); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(C) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(C))not yet in forceA PPSI must publish on its website by noon on the last day of each month the composition of the issuer's reserves held pursuant to the GENIUS Act as of noon of the last day of the prior month, using a format substantially similar to the template provided in table 1 to proposed § 15.11(e). The report must contain: the total number of outstanding payment stablecoins issued by the issuer; the amount (fair value) and composition of the reserves, including the average tenor and geographic location of custody of each category of reserve instruments.
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- monthly reserve-composition report (§ 15.11(e) table 1 format) published to PPSI website by noon on the last day of each month
- publication-time audit log with timestamp evidence
- geographic-custody-location attestation for each reserve category per § 15.11(e)
- Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certification per § 15.11(f)(2)
Vendor candidates
- Circle USDC primary
- Paxos USDP (Paxos USD) primary
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
genius-act.monthly-reserve-disclosurein genius-act
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.22; implements GENIUS Act § 10(c) (12 U.S.C. 5909(c))not yet in forceA covered custodian must segregate all covered assets of covered customers and not commingle them with the assets of the covered custodian. The OCC proposes to allow any covered custodian to commingle the covered assets of multiple covered customers in one or more omnibus accounts, to the extent that the steps it has taken pursuant to § 15.21(b) are adequate to maintain safe and sound practices for the use of omnibus accounts, and to the extent that the use of omnibus accounts is consistent with applicable law.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.41; implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(i) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(i))not yet in forceA PPSI must calculate a minimum capital requirement based on an evaluation of the risks associated with its business model and risk profile. Capital must be sufficient to support operations and maintain the capital levels that would be required under subpart E of proposed Part 15. The required capital amount must incorporate the operating history and operational risk of the issuer, consistent with the standards described above that the OCC uses to determine the capital requirement for de novo stablecoin issuers. Regulatory capital consists of two elements: common equity tier 1 capital and additional tier 1 capital (the OCC is not proposing tier 2 capital, additional capital deductions, or specific minimum ratios, electing a tailored, individualized-evaluation approach during the de novo period and beyond).
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- annual capital-adequacy assessment with business-model and operational-risk scenario analysis
- CET1 and AT1 instrument terms compliant with 12 CFR Part 3 substantive criteria (qualifying-equity attestation)
- OCC capital-amount-setting letter (cf. OCC Bulletin 2007-21 trust-bank precedent)
- quarterly capital-position report submitted to the OCC under § 15.14(i)
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
genius-act.permitted-issuer-classesin genius-act
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(b); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A)(i)–(viii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(A))not yet in forceReserve assets must comprise: (1) United States coins and currency (including Federal Reserve notes) or money standing to the credit of an account with a Federal Reserve Bank; (2) funds held as deposits or insured shares payable upon demand at an insured depository institution (including any foreign branches or agents, including correspondent banks), subject to FDIC/NCUA limitations; (3) Treasury bills, Treasury notes, or Treasury bonds with a remaining maturity of 93 days or less; (4) money received under repurchase agreements with the PPSI acting as seller (overnight only, fully collateralized by ≤93-day Treasury bills); (5) reverse repurchase agreements with the PPSI as purchaser, overnight maturity, tri-party / centrally cleared / or bilateral with an OCC-vetted counterparty; (6) securities issued by an investment company registered under section 8(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (a registered Government money-market fund) invested solely in the assets described in (1)–(5); (7) any other similarly liquid Federal Government-issued asset approved by the OCC, in consultation with the State payment stablecoin regulator if applicable; or (8) any reserve described in (1), (3), (6), or (7) in tokenized form, provided that such reserves comply with all applicable laws and regulations.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Circle USDC primary
- Paxos USDP (Paxos USD) primary
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(a); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(7) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(7))not yet in forceA permitted payment stablecoin issuer may engage in: (1) issuing payment stablecoins; (2) redeeming payment stablecoins; (3) managing reserves related to the issuance or redemption of payment stablecoins, including purchasing, selling, and holding reserve assets or providing custodial services for reserve assets, consistent with applicable State and Federal law; (4) providing custodial or safekeeping services for payment stablecoins, required reserves, or private keys of payment stablecoins consistent with the GENIUS Act; (5) assessing fees associated with the purchasing or redeeming of payment stablecoins; (6) holding and transacting in payment stablecoins as principal or agent; (7) paying fees to facilitate customer transactions (network or 'gas' fees); and (8) other activities that directly support (1)–(4).
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.30; implements GENIUS Act § 5(c)–(d) (12 U.S.C. 5904(c)–(d))not yet in forceAn insured national bank, Federal savings association, or insured Federal branch that seeks to issue payment stablecoins through a subsidiary, and any nonbank entity, uninsured national bank, or uninsured Federal branch that seeks to issue payment stablecoins as an FQPPSI, must file an application under proposed § 15.30 and obtain OCC prior approval before issuing payment stablecoins. The 120-day approval clock under GENIUS Act § 5(d)(1)(A) is measured from the date the OCC determines the application is substantially complete. Section 5(c) of the GENIUS Act prescribes factors for evaluating a substantially complete application: financial condition and resources; whether officers or directors have been convicted of a felony involving insider trading, embezzlement, cybercrime, money laundering, financing of terrorism, or financial fraud; competence, experience, and integrity of officers, directors, and principal shareholders; the applicant's redemption policy; and any other factors the OCC establishes that are necessary to ensure safety and soundness.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- Interagency Biographical and Financial Report submissions per § 15.30(b)(1)(ii)
- § 15.30(b)(1)(iii) certification of no material misrepresentations or omissions
- redemption-policy disclosure per § 15.12 referenced in § 15.30(c)
- fingerprints and FBI national criminal history background check per § 15.30(b)(4)
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
genius-act.permitted-issuer-classesin genius-act
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(1); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(9) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(9))not yet in forceA permitted payment stablecoin issuer shall not use any combination of terms relating to the United States Government, including 'United States,' 'United States Government,' and 'USG,' in the name of the payment stablecoin. The prohibition does not apply to abbreviations referring directly to the currency to which the stablecoin is pegged (e.g., 'USD').
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(4); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(11) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(11))not yet in forceA PPSI must not pay the holder of any payment stablecoin any form of interest or yield (whether in cash, tokens, or other consideration) solely in connection with the holding, use, or retention of such payment stablecoin. Proposed § 15.10(c)(4)(i) creates a rebuttable presumption that a PPSI is paying yield through a related third party where (A) the PPSI has a contract, agreement, or other arrangement with an affiliate or related third party; and (B) the affiliate or related third party pays interest or yield to a holder. The presumption may be rebutted by submitting written materials demonstrating the arrangement is not prohibited and is not an attempt to evade the prohibition.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- board-approved affiliate / related-third-party policy with § 15.10(c)(4)(i) rebuttal procedures
- white-label and partnership-agreement inventory with interest/yield-flow analysis
- rebuttal submission package for any flagged arrangement (contract, economic-substance memo, OCC engagement record)
- marketing-and-disclosure review log identifying any 'rewards,' 'cash-back,' or 'staking' messaging
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
genius-act.yield-prohibitionin genius-act
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(3); implements GENIUS Act § 4(e) (12 U.S.C. 5903(e))not yet in forceA PPSI may not directly or through implication represent that payment stablecoins are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, guaranteed by the United States Government, or subject to Federal deposit insurance or Federal share insurance.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(2); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(9) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(9))not yet in forceA PPSI shall not market a payment stablecoin in such a way that a reasonable person would perceive the payment stablecoin to be legal tender as described in 31 U.S.C. 5103, issued by the United States, or guaranteed or approved by the Government of the United States. Misrepresentations cannot be cured by general disclaimer.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(5); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(2) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(2))not yet in forceProhibits a PPSI from pledging, rehypothecating, or reusing any reserve assets required under 12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1), except for the purposes listed in section 4(a)(2) of the GENIUS Act: (i) satisfying margin obligations in connection with investments in permitted reserves under proposed § 15.11(b)(4) or (5); (ii) satisfying obligations associated with the use, receipt, or provision of standard custodial services; or (iii) creating liquidity to meet reasonable expectations of requests to redeem payment stablecoins, such that reserves in the form of Treasury bills with a maturity of 93 days or less may be sold as purchased securities in repurchase agreements that are cleared by an SEC-registered clearing agency, centrally cleared, or bilateral with an OCC-approved creditworthy counterparty. The 'directly or indirectly' language clarifies that a custodian holding reserves on behalf of a PPSI also may not rehypothecate.
- GB Governing Body
- 1st 1st Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- custody-agreement clauses prohibiting custodian rehypothecation per § 15.10(c)(5) and § 15.11(a)(1)(iv)
- repo-counterparty creditworthiness file with OCC pre-approval evidence (where applicable) per § 15.10(c)(5)(iii)
- Treasury-bill remaining-maturity log demonstrating ≤93 days at sale per repo
- monthly attestation that repurchase proceeds were used solely to meet redemption requests
Vendor candidates
- Circle USDC primary
- Paxos USDP (Paxos USD) primary
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
genius-act.reserves-rehypothecation-banin genius-act
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(i); implements GENIUS Act § 6(a)(1) (12 U.S.C. 5905(a)(1))not yet in forceA PPSI must submit quarterly reports of financial condition to the OCC, including but not limited to income statement, expenses, balance sheet, reserves, changes in equity, investments, capital, outstanding issuance value, and assets under custody, in a standardized format as prescribed by the OCC within 30 days of the end of the prior quarter. The provision mirrors the quarterly Call Report regime applicable to national banks and Federal savings associations under 12 U.S.C. 161(a) and 12 U.S.C. 1464(v).
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.12(d); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(B) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(B))not yet in forceA PPSI must publicly, clearly, and conspicuously disclose in plain language and in a format that is readily noticeable to customers, readily understandable by customers, and segregated from other information: (i) the name of the PPSI that issues the payment stablecoin; (ii) that the PPSI is the entity that is obligated to convert, redeem, or repurchase the payment stablecoin for a fixed amount of monetary value; (iii) the link to the monthly composition report of the relevant PPSI's reserves required under § 15.11(e); and (iv) all fees associated with purchasing or redeeming payment stablecoins. Updates to disclosures require at least seven calendar days' prior notice to customers under § 15.12(d)(2).
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.12(a)–(c); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(B) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(B))not yet in forceA PPSI must publicly disclose its redemption policy. The policy must include a timeframe in which the issuer will redeem payment stablecoins which, under proposed § 15.12(b)(1)(i), may not exceed two business days following the date of the requested redemption. Discretionary limitations on timely redemptions may only be imposed by the OCC or, in the case of a State qualified PPSI, by the OCC, the Federal Reserve, or the State payment stablecoin regulator. Under proposed § 15.12(c)(1), the period for timely redemption is extended to seven calendar days if a PPSI faces redemption demands in excess of 10 percent of its outstanding issuance value in a single 24-hour period; § 15.12(c)(4) requires the PPSI exceeding the 10% threshold to notify the OCC within 24 hours.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Circle USDC primary
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(a)(2)not yet in forceA PPSI must demonstrate the operational capability to access and monetize the identifiable reserve assets, commensurate with the PPSI's risk profile and business model. The PPSI must be able to monetize the reserve assets, potentially quickly and at short notice, in order to meet redemption requests. Operational evidence may include actual outright sales, repurchase transactions, multiple repurchase agreement lines, or other arrangements proportionate to size and complexity.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(a)(1); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(A))not yet in forceA PPSI must maintain reserve assets that: (i) are identifiable; (ii) are segregated from and not commingled with other assets owned or held by the PPSI; (iii) at all times have a total fair value that equals or exceeds the outstanding issuance value of the PPSI; and (iv) are either held directly by the PPSI or within the custody of an eligible financial institution. Fair value (not amortized cost) anchors the ≥1:1 backing requirement so that reserve assets reflect current market prices and are monetizable at a value sufficient to meet any redemption request.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- monthly reserve-composition report per § 15.11(e) with end-of-day fair-value reconciliation
- CEO/CFO certification per § 15.11(f)(2) (false certifications subject to 18 U.S.C. 1350(c) criminal penalties)
- custody agreements titled to the PPSI or a qualified custodian acting as agent (no liens/encumbrances)
- registered-public-accounting-firm examination report per § 15.11(f)(1) (cf. GENIUS Act § 4(a)(3)(C))
Vendor candidates
- Fireblocks Fireblocks Policy Engine (Transaction Authorization Policy) supporting
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
genius-act.reserves-1-to-1in genius-act - cross-references
genius-act.bankruptcy-reserves-excludedin genius-act - cross-references
genius-act.custody-bank-regulator-onlyin genius-act
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(a)(3); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(3) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(3))not yet in forceA PPSI may withdraw surplus reserve assets in excess of outstanding issuance value, calculated and reported as of the last day of the previous month, only upon the publication of that month's public disclosure under § 15.11(e) and (f). Withdrawal of excess reserves outside this attest-then-withdraw cadence is impermissible; a PPSI cannot make withdrawals on its own bad faith determination that an excess exists.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(c); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iii))not yet in forceReserve assets must be sufficiently diverse to manage credit, liquidity, interest-rate, and price risks. The proposed rule advances two alternative options — Option A: principles-based general requirement with an optional safe harbor containing quantitative requirements; Option B: mandatory quantitative requirements for all PPSIs. Option A safe harbor would deem a PPSI compliant if on each business day: (i) ≥10% of required reserves are deposits or insured shares payable upon demand or money standing to the credit of a Federal Reserve Bank account; (ii) ≥30% of reserves are payable upon demand, in a Federal Reserve Bank account, or unconditionally receivable within five business days; (iii) no more than 40% of reserves are at any one eligible financial institution; (iv) no more than 50% of the § 15.11(c)(2)(i) daily-liquidity amount is at any one eligible financial institution; and (v) reserve assets have a weighted average maturity of no more than 20 days.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(g)not yet in forceProposed § 15.11(g)(1) provides that a PPSI must notify the OCC through its appropriate supervisory office on any day in which its reserve asset amount has fallen below the required minimum in § 15.11(a). Proposed § 15.11(g)(2) provides that a PPSI falling below the required minimum would be barred from issuing new payment stablecoins until it had remediated the shortfall, except as necessary to facilitate a transfer of payment stablecoins from one distributed ledger to another and provided that the net outstanding issuance value does not increase. Proposed § 15.11(g)(3) provides that, if a PPSI fails to meet its reserve asset requirement for 15 consecutive business days, it must begin liquidation of reserve assets and redemption of outstanding payment stablecoins consistent with § 15.12 and may not charge customers a fee to redeem their payment stablecoins at any time during the liquidation.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.33; implements GENIUS Act § 5(i) (12 U.S.C. 5904(i))not yet in forceThe OCC may revoke the approval of a PPSI's application under § 15.30 if the PPSI does not submit the certification required by § 15.14(k). The OCC may issue an order to revoke approval of the application after providing notice and opportunity for a hearing pursuant to the OCC's Rules of Practice and Procedure in 12 CFR part 19. The OCC may act without providing an opportunity for a hearing if expeditious action is necessary to protect the public interest. The OCC may rescind approval of the registration of an FPSI under § 15.32, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, if the OCC determines the FPSI is not in compliance with the GENIUS Act.
- EA External Assurance
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.13(b); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iv) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iv))not yet in forceA PPSI must develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive written information security risk and control framework, including a program that assesses and manages information technology and information security risks. The program must (i) be approved by the board or a board committee; (ii) provide for the appointment of a qualified Information Technology and Security Officer; (iii) include an inventory and classification of assets, processes, and sensitivity of data; controls supporting and safeguarding sensitive information and processes; evaluation, validation, and reporting processes ensuring key IT systems and controls, including smart contracts, are operating as intended; periodic independent testing; and a comprehensive incident-identification, assessment, and response program; (iv) include administrative, technical, and physical safeguards over nonpublic personal customer information; and (v) develop, implement, and maintain measures to ensure secure handling of digital assets, including private key management, backup, and recovery.
- GB Governing Body
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- board- or board-committee-approved IT/security program document per § 15.13(b)(2)
- ITSO appointment record and qualifications memo per § 15.13(b)(2)
- smart-contract independent testing and validation report per § 15.13(b)(3)(iii)–(iv)
- private-key management, backup, and recovery procedures per § 15.13(b)(5); joint-statement-on-crypto-asset-safekeeping (July 14, 2025) alignment memo
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- cross-references
bsa.aml-programin bsa-fincen - cross-references
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-program-generalin treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026 - cross-references
ofac.sdn-screeningin ofac
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.13(a)(3); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iii))not yet in forceA PPSI must manage interest rate risk in a manner appropriate to the size and complexity of the issuer and the complexity of its assets and liabilities, and must provide for periodic reporting to management and the board of directors regarding interest rate risk with adequate information for management and the board to assess the level of risk.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.13(a)(1); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iv) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iv))not yet in forceA PPSI must have internal controls and information systems that are appropriate for the size and complexity of the PPSI and the nature, scope, and risk of its activities and that provide for (i) an organizational structure with appropriate segregation of duties and an internal control structure that establishes clear lines of authority and responsibility for monitoring adherence to established policies; (ii) effective risk assessment; (iii) timely and accurate financial, operational, and regulatory reporting; (iv) adequate procedures to safeguard, manage, control, and monetize assets, including reserve assets; and (v) compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The standards are modeled on 12 CFR Part 30, Appendix A.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.1(b)not yet in forceProposed Part 15 applies to activities related to payment stablecoins and certain custody activities of: (1) national banks and their subsidiaries; (2) Federal savings associations and their subsidiaries; (3) Federal branches and their subsidiaries; (4) foreign payment stablecoin issuers; (5) nonbank entities that seek to be or are approved as Federal qualified payment stablecoin issuers; and (6) State qualified payment stablecoin issuers for whom the OCC has regulatory or enforcement authority pursuant to proposed § 15.15 or § 15.16.
- GB Governing Body
Evidence the attestor samples
- board-approved entity-class determination memo with § 15.1(b) and § 15.2 cross-references
- Interagency Biographical and Financial Report submissions for each director, executive officer, and principal shareholder
- OCC application package per § 15.30(b)(1)(i) with form availability at www.occ.gov
- subsidiary chart and control-relationship attestation per § 15.2 'affiliate' definition
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
genius-act.permitted-issuer-classesin genius-act - cross-references
genius-act.foreign-issuer-comparable-regimein genius-act
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.23; implements GENIUS Act § 10(e) (12 U.S.C. 5909(e))not yet in forceThe requirements of subpart C do not apply to any national bank, Federal savings association, Federal branch, or PPSI solely on the basis that such entity engages in the business of providing hardware or software to facilitate a person's or entity's self-custody of their payment stablecoins or private keys. The requirements could nonetheless apply if, for example, an entity controls or holds itself out as controlling such payment stablecoins or private keys.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.3not yet in forceThe provisions of proposed Part 15 are separate and severable. If any provision is stayed or determined to be invalid, the remaining provisions shall continue in effect.
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.13(a)(7)not yet in forceA PPSI must (i) exercise appropriate due diligence in selecting its service providers; (ii) require its service providers by contract to implement appropriate measures designed to meet the requirements of Part 15; and (iii) as appropriate, monitor its service providers to confirm they have satisfied their obligations under Part 15. Monitoring may include reviewing audits, summaries of test results, or other equivalent evaluations of service providers.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(h)not yet in forceA PPSI must submit on a weekly basis, in the manner and form specified by the OCC, a confidential report containing the information requested in the form that will be available at www.occ.gov, including for each payment stablecoin it issues: the blockchains the stablecoin is listed on, outstanding issuance value, secondary market activity and price movement, redemption volume and times, detailed information regarding reserve assets, and other relevant information.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Circle Arc supporting Arc is one of the public blockchains over which Circle's USDC issuance is reportable on the OCC weekly cadence.
ofac
OFAC Sanctions
-
OFAC Revised Guidance on Entities Owned by Persons Whose Property and Interests in Property Are Blocked (2014-08-13)in force by July 18, 2026An entity owned 50 percent or more, individually or in the aggregate, directly or indirectly, by one or more blocked persons is itself blocked by operation of law — regardless of whether the entity is separately listed on the SDN list. Screening must consider ownership-chain analysis.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
31 C.F.R. § 501.603; 31 C.F.R. § 501.604in force by July 18, 2026Initial report of blocked property required within 10 business days of blocking. Annual report of blocked property by September 30. Rejected-transaction reports within 10 business days. Filed via OFAC Reporting System (TD F 90-22.50 or electronic equivalent).
Vendor candidates
- Fireblocks Fireblocks Policy Engine (Transaction Authorization Policy) supporting
-
50 U.S.C. § 1705; 31 C.F.R. Part 501 Appendix Ain force by July 18, 2026Civil penalties for IEEPA violations up to the greater of approximately $368,136 (2025 CMP-adjusted) or twice the amount of the underlying transaction, per violation. Criminal penalties for willful violations: up to $1,000,000 and 20 years imprisonment.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
31 C.F.R. Part 560 (Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations); E.O. 13599; E.O. 13846in force by July 18, 2026Comprehensive prohibition on most transactions with Iran, Iranian government, and Iranian financial institutions. Secondary sanctions exposure for non-U.S. persons facilitating significant transactions. Stablecoin flows to Iran-connected counterparties are blocked absent general/specific license.
-
31 C.F.R. Part 510 (North Korea Sanctions Regulations); E.O. 13722; E.O. 13810in force by July 18, 2026Comprehensive prohibition on transactions with the Government of North Korea, DPRK-linked persons, and property within the DPRK. Particularly relevant for stablecoin flows given Lazarus Group theft activity and Tornado Cash-era patterns.
-
31 C.F.R. Parts 587, 589; E.O. 14024; E.O. 14071; E.O. 14114in force by July 18, 2026Broad sanctions on the Russian Federation in response to its invasion of Ukraine. Includes blocking of major Russian financial institutions, prohibitions on services to Russian persons, and secondary-sanctions risk for non-U.S. financial institutions facilitating sanctions evasion (including via CVC).
-
50 U.S.C. § 1702 (IEEPA); E.O. 13224; 31 C.F.R. § 594.201in force by July 18, 2026U.S. persons are prohibited from dealing with Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons. Property and interests in property of SDNs within U.S. jurisdiction are blocked. Applies strictly — a single sanctioned counterparty renders the transaction prohibited.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Chainalysis Chainalysis KYT primary Wallet screening against the SDN-linked address graph.
- Circle Circle Agent Wallets supporting
- Circle USDC supporting USDC blacklist enforces OFAC SDN holds at the contract layer.
- Coinbase Coinbase Agentic Wallets supporting
- Elliptic Elliptic Lens primary
- Fireblocks Fireblocks Policy Engine (Transaction Authorization Policy) primary Pre-broadcast policy screens transactions against sanctioned addresses fed by KYT/forensics signals.
- Consensys MetaMask Institutional supporting
- Paxos USDP (Paxos USD) supporting
- Privado ID Privado ID supporting ZK-proof of non-sanctioned status satisfies a screening check without disclosing identity.
- Skyfire KYAPay supporting
- TRM Labs TRM Transaction Monitoring primary
-
E.O. 13662 (Russia sectoral); 31 C.F.R. Part 589in force by July 18, 2026Sectoral Sanctions Identifications List — restrictions on specific activities (e.g., new debt/equity issuance with tenor > 14 or 60 days) with named entities in targeted sectors of the Russian economy. Less restrictive than SDN blocking but still transaction-gating.
-
OFAC Sanctions Compliance Guidance for the Virtual Currency Industry (2021-10-15)in force by July 18, 2026OFAC compliance expectations for the virtual-currency industry: management commitment, risk assessment, internal controls, testing/auditing, training. Industry-specific controls: geolocation restrictions, cryptocurrency-address screening, transaction-monitoring with on-chain analytics, and SDN-list ingestion into screening pipelines.
- 2nd 2nd Line
- 3rd 3rd Line
reg-e
Regulation E
-
12 C.F.R. § 1005.3; 15 U.S.C. § 1693ain force by July 18, 2026Reg E covers electronic fund transfers authorized by a consumer to or from a consumer asset account. 'Account' means a demand-deposit, savings, or other consumer asset account (other than occasional/incidental credit). Applies to banks, credit unions, and certain nonbank payment providers. Stablecoin wallet-to-wallet transfers are NOT covered under the CFPB's current posture (2025-05-15 withdrawal of the Jan 2025 proposed interpretive rule).
-
12 C.F.R. § 1005.11; 15 U.S.C. § 1693fin force by July 18, 2026Consumer has 60 days from the periodic statement to assert an error. Institution must investigate and determine within 10 business days (or 45 days with provisional credit). Investigation extended to 20 / 90 business days for new accounts and certain transfer types. Written explanation required on denial; provisional credit reversal rules apply.
-
12 C.F.R. § 1005.7in force by July 18, 2026Initial disclosure of EFT terms required at account opening or before first EFT: liability for unauthorized transfers, telephone number and address for error/unauthorized-transfer reports, business days for transaction processing, types of EFTs and dollar limits, charges, right to receive documentation, right to stop payment, institution's liability for failure to make/stop transfers, disclosure of account information to third parties.
-
12 C.F.R. § 1005.9in force by July 18, 2026Institution must send periodic statement for each monthly cycle in which an EFT occurred, and at least quarterly otherwise. Statement must include EFT transaction details, account number, fees, balances, and address/telephone for error notice.
-
12 C.F.R. § 1005.10in force by July 18, 2026Pre-authorized transfers from consumer accounts must be authorized in writing by the consumer, with a copy provided. Consumer may stop payment by notifying the institution at least three business days before the scheduled transfer. Notice of transfers that vary must be provided at least 10 days in advance.
-
12 C.F.R. § 1005.6; 15 U.S.C. § 1693gin force by July 18, 2026Tiered consumer liability for unauthorized EFTs based on timeliness of reporting: $50 cap if reported within 2 business days of learning of loss/theft; $500 cap if reported within 60 days of the periodic statement; unlimited liability for transfers after the 60-day window. Different rules for transfers initiated without loss/theft of access device.
sec
SEC
-
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 §206(4); 17 C.F.R. § 275.206(4)-2in force by July 18, 2026Registered investment advisers with custody of client funds or securities must maintain those assets with a qualified custodian, provide account statements to clients, and obtain an annual surprise examination by an independent public accountant. Expanded safeguarding rule proposals have been pending; current rule remains operative.
-
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 §15(a); 17 C.F.R. § 240.15bin force by July 18, 2026Any person effecting transactions in securities for the account of others, or engaged in the business of buying and selling securities for their own account through a broker or otherwise, must register with the SEC as a broker-dealer (or qualify for an exemption). Registration triggers financial-responsibility, bookkeeping, and supervisory obligations. Applies to platforms facilitating tokenized-security trading.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
SEC v. W.J. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946); Securities Act of 1933 §2(a)(1)in force by July 18, 2026An 'investment contract' and therefore a security exists where there is (1) an investment of money, (2) in a common enterprise, (3) with a reasonable expectation of profits, (4) derived from the efforts of others. Payment stablecoins are excluded from 'security' by GENIUS Act §17 when issued by a PPSI. Tokenized equities, tokenized money market funds, tokenized Treasuries, and security tokens generally remain securities under Howey.
-
17 C.F.R. §§ 242.300–242.304 (Regulation ATS)in force by July 18, 2026Alternative Trading Systems trading securities must register as broker-dealers under Section 15(a) and file Form ATS. Applies to venues that provide a market-place or facility for bringing together purchasers and sellers of securities — including potential tokenized-security venues.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
17 C.F.R. § 240.15c3-3 (Customer Protection Rule)in force by July 18, 2026Broker-dealers must maintain physical possession or control of fully-paid and excess-margin customer securities, and segregate customer cash. The December 2025 Division of Trading & Markets staff statement confirms that tokenized stocks, bonds, and similar tokenized securities remain subject to the same possession-or-control requirements that have governed securities custody since 1972. The DTC tokenization pilot (H2 2026) operates within this framework.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 122 (2025-01-23)in force by July 18, 2026Rescinds SAB 121. Crypto asset custody arrangements are evaluated under existing GAAP (ASC 450, ASC 460) on whether a liability should be recognized based on probable-outflow analysis — rather than SAB 121's categorical requirement that custodied crypto be booked as both an asset and a liability on the custodian's balance sheet. Materially reduces the accounting cost of offering crypto custody at publicly-traded banks.
-
17 C.F.R. § 240.15c6-1 (as amended, Rel. No. 34-96930)in force by July 18, 2026Standard settlement cycle for most broker-dealer transactions reduced from T+2 to T+1, effective 2024-05-28. Applies to transactions in equities, corporate bonds, municipal securities, ETFs, and similar instruments. Tokenized securities currently clear and settle on T+1 via NSCC/DTC rails, with tokenization occurring as a post-settlement step.
- 1st 1st Line
-
SEC Division of Trading and Markets — Staff Statement on Tokenized Securities (2025-12-11)in force by July 18, 2026Staff statement clarifies that tokenized securities are securities subject to the same federal securities-law requirements as their non-tokenized counterparts. Distinguishes custodial tokenized securities (crypto asset represents an underlying security held in custody) from synthetic tokenized securities. Confirms that Rule 15c3-3, broker-dealer registration, and transfer-agent rules apply. Paves path for the DTC tokenization pilot (H2 2026) and Nasdaq tokenized-trading approval (January 2026).
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026
Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026)
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.520not yet in forceApplies USA PATRIOT Act § 314(a) mandatory information-sharing procedures to PPSIs: must respond to FinCEN information requests on behalf of law enforcement within prescribed timelines.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.540not yet in forceExtends USA PATRIOT Act § 314(b) voluntary information-sharing safe harbor to PPSIs: PPSIs may share information among themselves and with other 314(b)-registered financial institutions to identify money laundering and terrorist financing.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.210(b)not yet in forceA PPSI must maintain an effective customer-identification and customer-due-diligence program, including identifying and verifying the PPSI's account holders, identifying high-value transactions, and conducting appropriate enhanced due diligence; the program functions as the CIP-equivalent for PPSIs.
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Circle Circle Agent Wallets supporting
- Civic Civic Pass supporting Verifiable credential is consumed by the relying party's CDD pipeline; Civic does not gate.
- Coinbase Coinbase Agentic Wallets supporting
- Persona Persona KYA supporting
- Privado ID Privado ID supporting
- Skyfire KYAPay supporting Attestation-then-settle binding gives the relying party a CDD signal before funds move.
- Sumsub Sumsub Agent KYC supporting
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.210(b)not yet in forceA PPSI must conduct independent testing of the AML/CFT program for compliance and effectiveness.
- 3rd 3rd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.210(c)not yet in forceA PPSI must maintain the AML/CFT program through ongoing implementation — periodic risk-assessment updates, ongoing CDD, and prompt program updates upon any change that significantly affects the PPSI's ML/TF risk profile.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.210(b)not yet in forceA PPSI must designate an AML/CFT compliance officer with day-to-day responsibility for the program; the officer must have sufficient authority and resources to administer an effective program.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.210(a); implements 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h)(1)not yet in forceA PPSI has an effective AML/CFT program and complies with 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h)(1) by establishing the program under § 1033.210(b) and maintaining the program under § 1033.210(c). The program must be risk-based and ongoing customer due diligence is required.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
- 3rd 3rd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- board-approved AML/CFT program document
- AML/CFT National Priorities review memorandum
- independent testing engagement letter and report
- designated AML/CFT compliance officer appointment record
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
bsa.aml-programin bsa-fincen - interprets
bsa.fincen-2013-cvc-guidancein bsa-fincen
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.210(b)not yet in forceA PPSI must establish risk-based internal policies, procedures, and controls reasonably designed to assure compliance with the BSA and to direct attention and resources toward higher-risk customers and activities; must identify, assess, and document ML/TF risks through risk-assessment processes that incorporate the AML/CFT Priorities and update promptly upon material change.
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Chainalysis Chainalysis KYT primary Real-time KYT alerts against a curated illicit-address dataset are the risk-based monitoring control.
- Circle Circle Agent Wallets supporting
- Coinbase Coinbase Agentic Wallets supporting
- Elliptic Elliptic Lens primary Unified wallet- and transaction-screening surface with AI alert triage.
- Fireblocks Fireblocks Policy Engine (Transaction Authorization Policy) supporting
- Consensys MetaMask Institutional supporting
- Notabene Transaction Authorization Protocol (TAP) supporting
- TRM Labs TRM Transaction Monitoring primary Real-time and retrospective screening against TRM's illicit-activity database with configurable rules.
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.210(b)not yet in forceA PPSI must provide ongoing employee training on AML/CFT requirements.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.240(a)not yet in forceA PPSI must maintain the technical capabilities, policies, and procedures to block, freeze, and reject specific or impermissible transactions that violate Federal or State law, rules, or regulations. The obligation extends beyond the PPSI's direct customers and accounts to secondary-market activity, and to digital-asset-service-provider activities when authorized by the primary regulator.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- board-approved technical-capability attestation referencing § 1033.240(a)
- secondary-market freeze-execution test report (smart-contract function coverage)
- OFAC SDN list ingestion and screening latency log
- blocked-address registry change log
Vendor candidates
- Chainalysis Chainalysis KYT primary Pre-broadcast wallet/transaction screening enables block decisions.
- Circle Circle Agent Wallets supporting Contract-level policy hierarchy refuses signing outside the envelope (allowlists + caps), giving the issuer a block surface above the wallet.
- Circle USDC primary On-chain blacklist and pause are contract-level controls — mechanical, not policy.
- Coinbase Coinbase Agentic Wallets supporting Spending caps and allowlists are policy-enforced gates above the wallet signing layer.
- Elliptic Elliptic Lens supporting
- Fireblocks Fireblocks Policy Engine (Transaction Authorization Policy) primary The only code-enforced gate of the eight starter records — sits between request and MPC co-sign and translates analytics signals into actual block/approve decisions.
- Consensys MetaMask Institutional supporting
- Paxos USDP (Paxos USD) primary USDP contract enforces blacklist and pause at the protocol layer.
- TRM Labs TRM Transaction Monitoring primary
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
ofac.sdn-screeningin ofac - cross-references
genius-act.foreign-issuer-lawful-order-compliancein genius-act - implements
genius-act.treasury-bsa-aml-coordinationin genius-act
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.401not yet in forceAuthorizes OFAC to impose civil money penalties of up to $111,308 per violation (IEEPA-inflation-adjusted as of the NPRM) for materially or knowingly violating the effective sanctions compliance program requirement at proposed part 502, consistent with the GENIUS Act and pursuant to IEEPA and other statutory authorities.
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.610; cross-references 31 CFR § 1010.610not yet in forceApplies enhanced-due-diligence requirements for correspondent accounts for foreign financial institutions to PPSIs.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR §§ 1033.310–1033.315; cross-references 31 CFR §§ 1010.310–1010.315not yet in forceApplies the existing currency transaction report (CTR) regime to PPSIs. Because 'currency' under § 1010.100(m) does not include a payment stablecoin and 'transaction in currency' under § 1010.100(bbb)(2) requires physical transfer of currency, the CTR obligation only fires if the PPSI accepts physical currency (e.g., a kiosk or retail location). FinCEN nevertheless extends the regime to PPSIs prospectively.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR §§ 1010.100(ppp), 1010.100(qqq)not yet in forceAdds 'digital asset' (ppp) and 'distributed ledger' (qqq) to the BSA general-definitions section, providing the technological vocabulary other provisions reference.
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.402not yet in forceProvides for referral to the U.S. Department of Justice and administrative collection measures for civil money penalties assessed under § 502.401.
Vendor candidates
- Chainalysis Chainalysis Reactor evidence Investigation packages support law-enforcement referrals.
- TRM Labs TRM Forensics evidence
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.630; cross-references 31 CFR § 1010.630not yet in forceProhibits PPSIs from maintaining correspondent accounts for foreign shell banks and requires records concerning owners of foreign banks and agents for service of legal process.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.240(b)not yet in forceA PPSI must maintain the technological capability to comply, and must comply, with the terms of any lawful order — defined in § 1010.100(rrr) as any final and valid writ, process, order, rule, decree, command, or other requirement issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or authorized Federal agency to seize, freeze, burn, or prevent the transfer of payment stablecoins it issued.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- smart-contract seize / freeze / burn function test report
- court-order workflow runbook and authority matrix
- lawful-order intake and execution log (with execution-latency timestamps)
- key-management procedures for issuer-authority operations
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
genius-act.foreign-issuer-lawful-order-compliancein genius-act
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1010.100(rrr)not yet in forceDefines 'lawful order' as any final and valid writ, process, order, rule, decree, command, or other requirement issued under Federal law by a court of competent jurisdiction or authorized Federal agency that requires a PPSI to seize, freeze, burn, or prevent the transfer of payment stablecoins it issued.
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.102(a) → 31 CFR §§ 501.603, 501.604not yet in forceApplies OFAC's existing blocked- and rejected-transaction reporting obligations to PPSIs: an initial report of any blocked property within 10 business days of the blocking (31 CFR § 501.603(b)(1)), and a report of any rejected transaction within 10 business days of the rejection (31 CFR § 501.604).
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- OFAC Reporting System (TRS) submission receipts
- blocked-transaction case files with intake-to-filing timestamps
- 10-business-day filing SLA dashboard
- OFAC blocked-property quarterly aggregate report
Vendor candidates
- Chainalysis Chainalysis KYT supporting
- TRM Labs TRM Transaction Monitoring supporting
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
ofac.blocked-property-reportingin ofac
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.100not yet in forceEstablishes Part 1033 definitions; cross-refers to § 1010.100 for general BSA definitions and reserves part-specific definitional space.
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1010.100(t)(11)not yet in forceAdds permitted payment stablecoin issuer to the BSA definition of 'financial institution' at 31 CFR § 1010.100(t)(11), bringing PPSIs within the BSA program, reporting, recordkeeping, and information-sharing regime.
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Circle USDC primary
- Paxos USDP (Paxos USD) primary
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
bsa.aml-programin bsa-fincen - implements
genius-act.treasury-bsa-aml-coordinationin genius-act
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.620; cross-references 31 CFR § 1010.620not yet in forceApplies enhanced-due-diligence requirements for private banking accounts (including senior foreign political figures) to PPSIs.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.410; cross-references 31 CFR § 1010.410(a)-(d)not yet in forceA PPSI must comply with the recordkeeping obligations of § 1010.410(a)-(c): retain records of extensions of credit over $10,000 and cross-border transfers of currency, monetary instruments, funds, checks, investment securities, and credit over $10,000. Under § 1010.410(d), records related to any order issued under § 1010.370(a) must be retained for five years.
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Chainalysis Chainalysis KYT evidence
- Chainalysis Chainalysis Reactor evidence
- TRM Labs TRM Forensics evidence
- TRM Labs TRM Transaction Monitoring evidence
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1010.410(e); PPSI added at § 1010.410(e)(6)(i)(K)not yet in forceAdds PPSI to the list of financial institutions subject to the Recordkeeping Rule. Requires collection and retention of records for funds transfers and transmittals of funds of $3,000 or more.
- 2nd 2nd Line
Vendor candidates
- Coinbase (TRUST coalition) Travel Rule Universal Solution Technology (TRUST) supporting
- Notabene Transaction Authorization Protocol (TAP) supporting
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.320not yet in forceA PPSI must file a suspicious activity report (SAR) for any suspicious transaction relevant to a possible violation of law or regulation. The obligation extends to secondary-market activity — including transfers between parties to which the PPSI is not a direct counterparty but which the PPSI observes through its smart-contract operation.
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- SAR filing log with FinCEN BSA E-Filing System confirmations
- case-disposition records with five-year retention
- SAR-narrative quality review samples
- secondary-market transaction-monitoring rule inventory
Vendor candidates
- Chainalysis Chainalysis KYT supporting Alert pipeline feeds SAR detection; filing happens outside the product.
- Chainalysis Chainalysis Reactor evidence Case files and fund-flow visualisations support SAR narrative construction.
- Elliptic Elliptic Lens supporting
- TRM Labs TRM Forensics evidence
- TRM Labs TRM Transaction Monitoring supporting
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
bsa.sarin bsa-fincen
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.102(b)not yet in forceA PPSI must provide to OFAC, upon request, any and all certifications submitted to its primary Federal payment-stablecoin regulator or State payment-stablecoin regulator certifying, pursuant to the GENIUS Act, that the PPSI has implemented an effective sanctions compliance program.
- GB Governing Body
- EA External Assurance
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(a)not yet in forceEach PPSI is required to maintain an effective sanctions compliance program (SCP) that is risk-based and reasonably designed to ensure compliance with all applicable U.S. sanctions. The SCP must contain, at a minimum, the five elements specified at § 502.201(b)(1)-(5).
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- board-approved SCP document per § 502.201(b)(1)
- annual SCP risk-assessment per § 502.201(b)(2)
- OFAC 2019 'A Framework for OFAC Compliance Commitments' alignment memo
- OFAC Virtual Currency Industry Guidance (2021) alignment memo
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
ofac.civil-penaltyin ofac - interprets
ofac.virtual-currency-guidance-2021in ofac - implements
genius-act.treasury-bsa-aml-coordinationin genius-act
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(b)(3)not yet in forceA PPSI must establish and maintain a system of risk-based internal controls — including technical capabilities and written policies and procedures — applicable to all payment-stablecoin-related activity (primary or secondary market) that: (A) identifies activity prohibited by U.S. sanctions; (B) blocks or rejects activity that violates or would violate U.S. sanctions; (C) reports to OFAC as required (including under § 502.102(b) and part 501); and (D) retains relevant records per part 501.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- screening-engine coverage report (SDN List + 50 Percent Rule + sectoral lists)
- blocked and rejected transaction log
- written internal-controls policies per § 502.201(b)(3)(ii)
- remediation log for identified gaps per § 502.201(b)(3)(iii)(A)
Vendor candidates
- Fireblocks Fireblocks Policy Engine (Transaction Authorization Policy) primary
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
ofac.sdn-screeningin ofac - implements
ofac.50-percent-rulein ofac - cross-references
ofac.blocked-property-reportingin ofac
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.102(a); cross-references 31 CFR Part 501, Subpart Cnot yet in forceImposes on PPSIs the standard OFAC recordkeeping and reporting requirements at part 501, subpart C. PPSIs are U.S. persons for these purposes; recordkeeping and reporting obligations under part 501 arise pursuant to part 502.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(b)(2)not yet in forceA PPSI must conduct holistic U.S.-sanctions risk assessments at appropriate intervals analysing all payment-stablecoin-related activity, customer base, size and complexity, foreign-person contact points, and product set; must use the assessments to inform SCP operation; and must revise assessments to account for identified violations or deficiencies, new products, mergers, or other risk-profile changes.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(b)(1)not yet in forceSenior management must review and approve the SCP and support its effective implementation, including by ensuring the SCP applies to all payment-stablecoin-related activity, has sufficient resources, is fully integrated into ongoing operations, routinely provides risk updates including testing results, and confers sufficient authority and autonomy on the compliance function.
- GB Governing Body
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(b)(4)not yet in forceA PPSI must establish and maintain an independent testing or audit function, accountable to senior management, with sufficient resources, expertise, and authority to identify sanctions-compliance weaknesses and deficiencies; qualified personnel must perform comprehensive, independent, objective testing or auditing routinely; results must be used to remediate gaps and update controls.
- 2nd 2nd Line
- 3rd 3rd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(b)(5)not yet in forceA PPSI must provide periodic sanctions-compliance training to all appropriate personnel.
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.221not yet in forceAML/CFT program supervision and enforcement is conducted by the primary Federal payment-stablecoin regulator (OCC for federal-qualified PPSIs; Federal Reserve for IDI-subsidiary PPSIs) or the State payment-stablecoin regulator for state-qualified PPSIs, with FinCEN retaining its statutory authority.
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR §§ 1010.100(bbb)(1), 1010.100(eee)not yet in forceRevises the BSA definitions of 'transaction' (bbb)(1) and 'transmittal order' (eee) to include the issuance or redemption of a payment stablecoin and to permit transmittal orders to denominate amounts in payment stablecoin, anchoring all subsequent BSA reporting and recordkeeping triggers to on-chain activity.
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1010.410(f); PPSI added at § 1010.410(e)(6)(i)(K)not yet in forceApplies the Travel Rule to PPSIs. For payment-stablecoin transmittals of funds of $3,000 or more, the originating PPSI must transmit specified originator and beneficiary information to the next financial institution in the payment chain; the information must 'travel' with the transmittal.
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
Evidence the attestor samples
- IVMS 101 message log sample (originator and beneficiary fields)
- Travel Rule network transmission records (Notabene TAP, Sumsub Travel Rule, TRUST, Shyft, or comparable)
- $3,000 threshold aggregation-logic test report
- unhosted-wallet transmittal policy
Vendor candidates
- Coinbase (TRUST coalition) Travel Rule Universal Solution Technology (TRUST) primary Coalition network routes originator/beneficiary data point-to-point between member VASPs without central storage.
- Notabene Transaction Authorization Protocol (TAP) primary Open messaging protocol that IS the Travel Rule data exchange between VASPs.
Implements / interprets / cross-references
- implements
bsa.travel-rulein bsa-fincen - implements
fatf-r16.virtual-asset-travel-rule-2019in fatf-r16
us-state-mtl-baseline
State MTL Baseline
-
CSBS MTMA §501; state MTL statutesin force by July 18, 2026Licensees must provide pre-transaction disclosures of the amount transmitted, any fees, the exchange rate (where applicable), and the total amount to be received by the beneficiary. Receipt provided post-transaction. Refund and error-resolution rights per state law.
-
CSBS MTMA §404; state MTL statutesin force by July 18, 2026State regulators conduct on-site and off-site examinations on a risk-based cycle. Multi-State MSB Examination Program coordinates exams across state regulators for large transmitters via the Multi-State Money Services Business (MSB) Examination Program. Records must be maintained for at least 5 years.
-
State money-transmitter statutes (49 states + DC); CSBS MTMA §§ 201–203in force by July 18, 2026Engaging in the business of money transmission involving state residents generally requires a state money-transmitter license. 'Money transmission' is defined broadly under MTMA to include selling or issuing payment instruments, selling or issuing stored value, and receiving money or monetary value for transmission — including, under MTMA §102, certain virtual-currency activity. Precise scope and exemptions vary by state.
-
CSBS MTMA §301; state MTL statutesin force by July 18, 2026Net-worth (tangible capital) requirement calibrated to transmission volume and locations of operation. MTMA standardizes a tiered net-worth schedule; non-MTMA states retain their own figures. Typical floor: the greater of a fixed minimum (e.g., $100,000 in MTMA) and a multiple of volume / transaction count.
-
CSBS Nationwide Multistate Licensing System (NMLS)in force by July 18, 2026Licensees generally submit applications, amendments, and periodic reports through NMLS — the shared registry operated by CSBS on behalf of participating state regulators. MTMA §204 codifies NMLS use for member states. Facilitates multi-state licensure and examination coordination.
-
CSBS MTMA §303; state MTL statutesin force by July 18, 2026Licensee must hold permissible investments at least equal to the aggregate amount of all outstanding payment instruments and stored-value obligations. Permissible investments are restricted to specified low-risk assets: cash and equivalents, U.S. Treasury securities, state and municipal debt of high grade, money-market mutual funds, and limited deposits at insured depository institutions. Virtual-currency obligations must generally be held in like-kind virtual currency under MTMA §103(d).
-
CSBS MTMA §302; state MTL statutesin force by July 18, 2026Surety bond (or equivalent security) required as a condition of licensure, amount calibrated to transmission volume. Bond runs to the state for the benefit of claimants harmed by violation of the MTL statute. MTMA standardizes a volume-scaled schedule; non-MTMA states set their own amounts.
Provisions grouped by who is accountable under the IIA Three Lines Model (2020). A provision appears under every layer it implicates — accountability is frequently shared between the line that owns a control and the function that oversees it.
Governing Body
Oversight & risk appetite
-
FinCEN Guidance FIN-2013-G001 (2013-03-18)BSA / FinCEN in force by July 18, 2026CVC-money-transmission-classification risk: failure of the Governing Body to recognize that administrators and exchangers of convertible virtual currency are money transmitters under FinCEN Guidance FIN-2013-G001 — and therefore MSBs subject to BSA registration, AML program, SAR, CTR, Travel Rule, and recordkeeping obligations — operates a de-facto unregistered MSB exposed to civil-money penalty and potential criminal exposure under 18 U.S.C. § 1960 for unlicensed money transmission. Per FIN-2013-G001 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
31 U.S.C. § 5330; 31 C.F.R. § 1022.380BSA / FinCEN in force by July 18, 2026Charter-and-approval risk: failure of the Governing Body to authorize and complete FinCEN MSB registration (Form 107) before commencing money-transmission activity under 31 U.S.C. § 5330 and 31 CFR § 1022.380, or to renew biennially, operates an unregistered MSB subject to civil-money penalty and potential criminal exposure under 18 U.S.C. § 1960 for unlicensed money transmission. Per 31 CFR § 1022.380 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FATF Recommendation 15 Interpretive Note ¶3FATF R.15 in force by July 18, 2026Charter-and-approval risk: a VASP that operates without Governing-Body-authorized licensing or registration in the jurisdiction of creation or place of business — required by FATF R.15 Interpretive Note ¶3 and implemented through member-jurisdiction regimes (US MSB registration, EU MiCA CASP authorization, MAS DPT licensing, HKMA stablecoin-issuer license) — exposes the entity to enforcement against unlicensed activity and contributes to member-jurisdiction mutual-evaluation findings. Per FATF R.15 IN ¶3 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.1 — "deposit" definitionFDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDefinitional-classification risk: failure of the Governing Body of an FDIC-supervised IDI to document that its tokenized-deposit issuance falls within the proposed 12 CFR § 350.1 definition — ledger representation of a deposit liability, not a separate instrument — exposes the institution to mischaracterization as a payment-stablecoin issuer under GENIUS Act § 3(a) and conditions cease-and-desist exposure if the structure falls outside the deposit-insurance perimeter. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.1 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(h); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(3) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(3))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAudited-financial-statement risk: missed PCAOB-registered examination of the previous month-end report, or absent CEO/CFO certification under § 350.4(h) — the External-Assurance attestation that operationalizes GENIUS Act § 4(a)(3) — forfeits the statutory attestation chain. **Impact:** false-certification exposure under 18 U.S.C. 1350(c), FDIC supervisory action, and audit-committee remediation order. **Recommendation:** locked-cadence monthly examination workflow with audit-committee sign-off ahead of FDIC submission; target an optimized (CMMI level 5) capability maturity for the certification process. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(h).
- also
- EA External Assurance
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), FR 18535, amendments to 12 CFR Part 330; implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A)(viii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(A)(viii))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceTokenized-deposit-misclassification risk: an IDI that issues 'deposit tokens' but represents them as payment stablecoins (or vice versa) faces a classification challenge under § 350.1 and Part 330. Tokenized deposits are a deposit liability of the IDI insured under standard Part 330 categories; payment stablecoins are not deposits and reserves backing them carry corporate-deposit treatment only.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(a)(1)–(4); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(7) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(7))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCharter-applicability risk: an FDIC-supervised PPSI that conducts activity outside the four § 350.3(a)(1)–(4) core categories — issuance, redemption, reserve management, or covered-asset custody — operates outside its sanctioned activity perimeter implementing GENIUS Act § 4(a)(7). Custody of non-payment-stablecoin digital assets is a particular trap. The Governing Body must enforce the activity-perimeter gate; the 2nd Line compliance function reviews new products against the perimeter. Per § 350.3(a)(1)–(4) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(a)(5)–(8); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(7)(A)(v) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(7)(A)(v))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCharter-applicability risk: a PPSI that conducts supporting activity outside the § 350.3(a)(5)–(8) categories — fee assessment, wallet infrastructure hosting, principal/agent token activity, and other FDIC-approved support — without FDIC approval under (a)(8), engages in activity that fails the 'directly support' test in § 4(a)(7)(A)(v). The Governing Body must enforce the perimeter; the 2nd Line compliance function pre-clears new supporting-activity proposals. Per § 350.3(a)(5)–(8) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(8)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCredit-extension risk: an FDIC-supervised PPSI that extends credit (directly or indirectly through a parent IDI line) to customers for the purpose of purchasing payment stablecoins violates § 350.3(b)(8). The FDIC views this as creating a highly-leveraged-balance-sheet exposure that undermines reserve resiliency and is a structural prohibition — not merely a reserve-quality concern. This provision has no parallel in the OCC NPRM and must be confirmed in IDI-subsidiary credit policies.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(1); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(9) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(9))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDeceptive-marketing risk: a PPSI brand name combining 'United States,' 'United States Government,' 'USG,' or equivalent USG-suggesting terms — outside the currency-abbreviation carve-out in § 350.3(c) — breaches § 350.3(b)(1) implementing GENIUS Act § 4(a)(9). The 2nd Line compliance function locks the brand-name standard; the Governing Body approves any name with USG-adjacent vocabulary. Exposes the PPSI and parent IDI to FDIC action. Per § 350.3(b)(1) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(6); implements GENIUS Act § 4(h)(1) (12 U.S.C. 5903(h))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCharter-applicability risk: any activity the FDIC determines to be an evasion of § 4 of the GENIUS Act or Part 350 — structured to formally satisfy a rule while defeating its purpose — is prohibited under § 350.3(b)(6) implementing GENIUS Act § 4(h)(1). Evasion exposure is substance-over-form and a discrete examination enforcement hook. The Governing Body owns the perimeter; the 2nd Line compliance function reviews creative structuring. Per § 350.3(b)(6) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(4); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(11) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(11))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceYield-evasion risk: any affiliate or related-third-party (including white-label-partner) arrangement that channels interest or yield to PPSI holders triggers the FDIC's rebuttable presumption under § 350.3(b)(4); failure to rebut with written materials produces a statutory violation of GENIUS Act § 4(a)(11), an IDI safety-and-soundness finding for the parent IDI, and FDIC enforcement.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(5); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(2) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(2))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRehypothecation risk: any pledge, rehypothecation, or reuse of reserve assets outside the three § 4(a)(2) exceptions — including indirect through a custodian, an affiliate of a custodian, or a sub-custodian — is a statutory violation. The FDIC requires PPSI prior written approval (vs. OCC's pre-approval pattern) for any repurchase agreement that is not SEC-cleared.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(j)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceOperational-resilience risk: absence of a board-adopted written restoration plan under § 350.4(j) — with reserve-monitoring trigger thresholds, pre-arranged funding sources, a designated authority chain, and the 2LoD escalation pathway from below-threshold alert to § 350.4(a) restoration — leaves the FDIC-supervised PPSI without the Governing-Body-blessed contingency scaffolding the FDIC presumes, and conditions FDIC discretionary intervention to begin orderly redemption under § 350.4(i). Per § 350.4(j) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(4)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceGoverning-body-oversight risk: board acceptance of asset-growth rates that outrun risk-management and operational capabilities — the dual-anchor obligation that the Governing Body sets growth tolerance and the 2LoD validates capability adequacy per § 350.6(a)(4) — exposes the parent IDI to § 39 safety-and-soundness criticism and surfaces under FDIC examination as the gap between approved growth plan and operational-capacity attestation. Per § 350.6(a)(4) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(5)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceGoverning-body-oversight risk: insider or affiliate transactions (other than with the parent IDI) that pose significant risk of material financial loss to the PPSI or are conducted on terms less favorable than arm's-length comparables — per § 350.6(a)(5)(i) — surface a failure of Governing-Body conflicts review and 2LoD related-party-transaction controls, exposing the parent IDI to § 39 safety-and-soundness findings and Sections 23A/23B-style scrutiny in examination. Per § 350.6(a)(5) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FSB High-Level Recommendation 4 (2023-07-17)FSB GSC in force by July 18, 2026Governing-body-oversight risk: a GSC arrangement that lacks a comprehensive governance framework with clear accountability allocation across issuance, transfer, custody, reserve management, validation, and governance functions — proportionate to risk and inclusive of decentralised operations and conflicts-of-interest controls under FSB High-Level Recommendation 4 (2023-07-17) — exposes the arrangement to regulatory-comparability findings, supervisory criticism on board-level accountability, and FSB peer-review remediation in subsequent implementation reviews. Per FSB GSC HLR 4 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FSB High-Level Recommendation 7 (2023-07-17)FSB GSC in force by July 18, 2026Operational-resilience risk: a GSC arrangement that lacks Governing-Body-adopted recovery and resolution plans enabling either through-stress continued operation or orderly wind-down without systemic disruption, and that does not embed the 2LoD testing-and-review cadence required by FSB High-Level Recommendation 7 (2023-07-17), exposes itself to regulatory-comparability findings, member-authority supervisory directives, and FSB peer-review criticism on resolvability — particularly where the arrangement is judged of global systemic significance. Per FSB GSC HLR 7 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
GENIUS Act §11(a); Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceCharter-applicability risk: a digital-asset service provider that offers a payment stablecoin in the U.S. after 2028-07-18 — where the stablecoin is not issued by a PPSI or authorized foreign issuer under § 11(a) — operates a prohibited distribution. Exposes the DASP to GENIUS Act enforcement and conditions venue-side delisting of any non-PPSI stablecoin. The Governing Body must operationalize the cutover ahead of the sunset. Per GENIUS Act § 11(a) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
GENIUS Act §3(a); Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceIssuance-authorization risk: failure of the Governing Body to confirm permitted-payment-stablecoin-issuer (PPSI) status — or to recognize authorized-foreign-issuer registration under GENIUS Act § 9 — before issuing payment stablecoins to US persons under GENIUS Act § 3(a) operates as unauthorized issuance, exposes the entity to federal injunction and civil-money penalty, and conditions immediate cease-and-desist exposure across distribution venues and downstream digital-asset-service-provider listing surfaces. Per GENIUS Act § 3(a) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
GENIUS Act §4; Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceIssuer-class-eligibility risk: failure of the Governing Body to confirm that the issuing entity falls within a GENIUS Act § 4 permitted-issuer class — federally qualified PPSI, state-qualified PPSI, or IDI-subsidiary PPSI — and to maintain ongoing eligibility under that class's specific supervisory regime, operates as an unauthorized issuer, exposes the entity to federal injunction and civil-money penalty, and conditions venue-side delisting on regulatory-clarity grounds. Per GENIUS Act § 4 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
GENIUS Act §17; Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act in force by July 18, 2026Definitional-classification risk: failure of the Governing Body to recognize that GENIUS Act § 17 carves PPSI-issued payment stablecoins out of the federal securities and commodities definitions — and to align the issuer's offering, registration, and disclosure posture with the banking-regulator perimeter — exposes the issuer to dual-track enforcement claims by SEC or CFTC and conditions venue listing and custodian acceptance. Per GENIUS Act § 17 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
GENIUS Act §8; Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceYield-prohibition-compliance risk: failure of the Governing Body to enforce the GENIUS Act § 8 prohibition on payment-stablecoin issuers paying interest or yield to holders — including indirect yield through affiliate marketing, rebate, or loyalty arrangements that operate as functional remuneration — exposes the issuer to civil-money penalty, primary-supervisor cease-and-desist exposure, and conditions revocation of permitted-issuer status if the prohibition is found to be circumvented. Per GENIUS Act § 8 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(m); cross-references 12 CFR 5.50OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceChange-in-control risk: an acquirer that does not file 60 days' prior notice under 12 CFR 5.50 as referenced from § 15.14(m), or that proceeds without OCC non-disapproval — including failure to submit complete control information within 15 calendar days post-acquisition — forfeits the Governing-Body fitness-and-integrity gate and exposes the PPSI to OCC supervisory and enforcement action against the new controlling person. Per § 15.14(m) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.41(a)(1)(i)(B); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(i) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(i))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCapital-adequacy risk: a de novo PPSI — or an SQPPSI within three years of transition — that falls below the $5M minimum floor under § 15.41(a)(1)(i)(B) lacks the cushion the OCC presumes adequate for initial operations (trust-bank precedent $6.05M–$25M). The Governing Body capitalizes and maintains the floor; the 2nd Line monitors headroom. Exposes the PPSI to OCC capital directives and § 15.33 revocation. Per § 15.41(a)(1)(i)(B) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(6); implements GENIUS Act § 4(h)(1) (12 U.S.C. 5903(h)(1))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCharter-applicability risk: any activity the OCC determines to be an evasion of GENIUS Act § 4 or Part 15 — structured to formally satisfy a rule while defeating its purpose — is prohibited under § 15.10(c)(6) implementing § 4(h)(1). Evasion is substance-over-form and a discrete examination enforcement hook. The Governing Body owns the perimeter; the 2nd Line reviews creative structuring. Per § 15.10(c)(6) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(f); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(3)(C) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(3)(C))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAudited-financial-statement risk: a registered public accounting firm examination missed past the noon-on-last-day deadline, or absent CEO/CFO certification under § 15.11(f) — the External-Assurance attestation operationalizing GENIUS Act § 4(a)(3)(C) — breaks the statutory attestation chain. **Impact:** false-certification exposure under 18 U.S.C. 1350(c) and OCC supervisory action separate from the underlying composition deficiency. **Recommendation:** locked-cadence monthly examination workflow with audit-committee sign-off ahead of OCC submission; target an optimized (CMMI level 5) capability maturity for the certification process. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(f).
- also
- EA External Assurance
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.41; implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(i) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(i))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCapital-adequacy risk: a PPSI that fails to demonstrate operating-history-adjusted minimum capital under the individualized § 15.41 approach — or that allows capital to fall below the OCC-set requirement — exposes itself to OCC capital directives, PCA-style supervisory action under amended Part 6, and ultimately revocation under § 15.33.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(a); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(7) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(7))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCharter-applicability risk: a PPSI that engages in activity outside the eight § 15.10(a) categories — issuance, redemption, reserve management, covered-asset custody, fees, principal/agent activity, gas fees, and OCC-blessed directly-supporting activity — operates outside its sanctioned activity perimeter. The Governing Body owns the perimeter; the 2nd Line compliance function pre-clears new products. Exposes the PPSI to OCC supervisory action and § 15.33 revocation. Per § 15.10(a) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.30; implements GENIUS Act § 5(c)–(d) (12 U.S.C. 5904(c)–(d))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceApplication-deficiency risk: a § 15.30(b)(3)(i) filing that lacks Interagency Biographical and Financial Report submissions for every director, executive officer, and principal shareholder, or that contains a material misrepresentation under § 15.30(b)(1)(iii), is grounds for OCC denial under § 15.30(d) or nullification under § 15.30(g)(1).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(1); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(9) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(9))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDeceptive-marketing risk: a PPSI brand name combining 'United States,' 'United States Government,' 'USG,' or any equivalent USG-suggesting combination — outside the currency-abbreviation carve-out — breaches § 15.10(c)(1) implementing GENIUS Act § 4(a)(9). The 2nd Line compliance function locks the brand-name standard; the Governing Body approves any name with USG-adjacent vocabulary. Exposes the PPSI to OCC supervisory action and § 15.33 revocation. Per § 15.10(c)(1) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(4); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(11) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(11))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceYield-evasion risk: an affiliate or related-third-party arrangement that pays yield to PPSI holders triggers a rebuttable presumption of evasion under § 15.10(c)(4)(i); failure to rebut with documentary evidence produces a statutory violation of § 4(a)(11) and exposes the PPSI to OCC enforcement and supervisory action.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(5); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(2) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(2))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRehypothecation risk: any pledge, rehypothecation, or reuse of reserve assets outside the three enumerated § 4(a)(2) exceptions — including indirect rehypothecation by a custodian — is a statutory violation. The 93-day Treasury-bill repo carve-out is the only liquidity path; longer maturities or non-Treasury collateral fall outside the exception and trigger OCC enforcement.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.13(b); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iv) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iv))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceOperational-resilience risk: an inadequate IT/security program — particularly weak private-key management, untested smart-contract controls, or absence of board-approved incident response — exposes the PPSI to safety-and-soundness MRA/MRIA citation under § 15.13(b), and any unauthorized access to sensitive customer information triggers § 15.13(b)(7) customer-notification obligations.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.13(a)(3); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iii))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceInterest-rate-risk-management risk: absence of the 2LoD interest-rate-risk function appropriate to PPSI size and balance-sheet complexity, including the periodic reporting cadence to management and the board required by § 15.13(a)(3), forfeits the Governing Body's line of sight into interest-rate sensitivity on monetizable reserve assets and surfaces as OCC examination criticism with downstream Part 6 PCA-style capital implications. Per § 15.13(a)(3) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.1(b)OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceEntity-class mis-classification risk: an applicant or operator that mis-identifies its § 15.1(b) class triggers the wrong supervisory pathway (FQPPSI vs. SQPPSI, OCC vs. State, exam cadence, capital regime) and exposes itself to OCC denial of substantially complete application under § 15.30(d), or rescission under § 15.33.
-
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 §15(a); 17 C.F.R. § 240.15bSEC in force by July 18, 2026Broker-dealer-registration risk: a person or entity effecting securities transactions for the account of others, or buying and selling securities for its own account as part of a regular business under Exchange Act §15(a), without filing Form BD and maintaining FINRA membership, operates an unregistered broker-dealer subject to SEC enforcement, parallel FINRA disciplinary exposure under Rule 8000-series proceedings, and §29(b) rescission of transactions entered while unregistered. Per Exchange Act §15(a) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
17 C.F.R. §§ 242.300–242.304 (Regulation ATS)SEC in force by July 18, 2026Regulation-ATS-operating risk: an alternative trading system that operates a multilateral matching venue for any class of security without the Form ATS filing, fair-access program where the §301(b)(5) threshold is triggered, surveillance, and recordkeeping required by Reg ATS, forfeits the conditional Exchange Act §3(a)(1) exemption, exposes the venue to SEC §19(h) enforcement, and conditions unregistered-exchange liability for its broker-dealer participants. Per 17 C.F.R. §§ 242.300–242.304 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.210(a); implements 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h)(1)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAML/CFT program-deficiency risk: failure to maintain an effective program meeting 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h)(1) standards — covering internal controls, BSA officer designation, training, independent testing, customer due diligence, and AML/CFT National Priorities review — exposes the PPSI to BSA civil-money penalty, supervisory action by the primary federal or state payment-stablecoin regulator, FinCEN enforcement, and recurring examination findings.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
- 3rd 3rd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1010.100(t)(11)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRegime-trigger risk: PPSI status under the BSA financial-institution definition at proposed 31 CFR § 1010.100(t)(11) is the gate that activates all downstream AML/CFT, SAR, CTR, Travel Rule, and recordkeeping obligations; mis-classification removes the entire program scaffolding and exposes the operator to BSA civil-money penalty and supervisory action by the primary federal or state payment-stablecoin regulator.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.102(b)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceSenior-management-commitment risk: PPSI inability to produce on OFAC request any GENIUS Act SCP-effectiveness certification submitted to the primary federal or state payment-stablecoin regulator under § 502.102(b) — surfaces a failure of the Governing-Body attestation chain and the External-Assurance regulator-coordination interface, and provides OFAC with a discrete IEEPA civil-penalty hook against the certifying executives. Per § 502.102(b) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- EA External Assurance
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(b)(1)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceSenior-management-commitment risk: failure of senior management to review, approve, resource, and integrate the sanctions compliance program — including ensuring program coverage of all payment-stablecoin-related activity, routine risk and testing updates, and sufficient authority and autonomy for the compliance function per § 502.201(b)(1) — fails the Governing-Body IIA 2020 obligation and creates strict-liability IEEPA exposure plus supervisory enforcement by the primary federal or state payment-stablecoin regulator. Per § 502.201(b)(1) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
1st Line
Operations — owns the risk
-
31 C.F.R. § 1010.311; 31 U.S.C. § 5313BSA / FinCEN in force by July 18, 2026CTR-filing risk: failure of the 1LoD operations function to file Currency Transaction Reports for currency transactions exceeding $10,000 — including aggregated same-day transactions by or for the same person under 31 CFR § 1010.311 — within the 15-day window, or to retain 2LoD oversight of aggregation logic, exposes the institution to BSA civil-money penalty, FinCEN enforcement, and adverse examination findings on currency-reporting controls. Per 31 CFR § 1010.311 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
31 C.F.R. § 1010.410(f); 31 C.F.R. § 1020.410(a)BSA / FinCEN in force by July 18, 2026Travel-Rule-compliance risk: failure of the 1LoD operations function to package and transmit prescribed originator and beneficiary information — name, address, account number, amount, execution date, and beneficiary institution — on transmittals of $3,000 or more under 31 CFR § 1010.410(f), or to retain 2LoD oversight of packaging integrity, exposes the institution to BSA civil-money penalty, FinCEN enforcement, and correspondent-bank de-risking. Per 31 CFR § 1010.410(f) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.1 — "outstanding issuance value"FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceOutstanding-issuance-measurement risk: failure of the 1LoD operations function to maintain real-time measurement of consolidated par value under proposed 12 CFR § 350.1 — the load-bearing figure for reserve-coverage calculation, GENIUS Act § 5(c) tier-classification, redemption thresholds, and brand-aggregated reporting — and 2LoD compliance oversight of the measurement methodology, exposes the institution to misreporting findings, civil-money penalty, and conditions forced supervisory recalculation at primary-regulator initiation. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.1 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(c)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-shortfall risk: a PPSI issuing more than one brand that comingles reserve pools without prior FDIC written approval per § 350.4(c) loses the per-brand identifiability the rule requires, breaks the brand-level § 350.4(a) backing test, and exposes one brand's holders to another brand's redemption pressure. **Impact:** § 350.4(i) discretionary toolkit fires against the comingled pool. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line operations function tags every reserve position to its brand at the custodian-account level, with 2nd Line compliance reconciliation; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(c).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), FR 18535, amendments to 12 CFR Part 330FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forcePass-through-misrepresentation risk: any PPSI or IDI-affiliate communication implying that stablecoin holders enjoy pass-through FDIC coverage on reserves is a direct violation of the Part 330 amendment and § 350.3(b)(3). The FDIC operative policy is unambiguous: corporate-deposit treatment at the PPSI level only — holders bear the credit risk on the issuer and the eligible financial institution.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(e); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(A))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceStablecoin-reserve-quality risk: any holding outside the seven enumerated § 350.4(e) categories — U.S. coins/currency, Federal Reserve balances, IDI demand deposits, ≤93-day Treasuries, overnight repos backed by such Treasuries, qualifying reverse repos, or registered government MMF shares — is ineligible and disqualified from the § 350.4(a) backing calculation regardless of credit quality. **Impact:** the next mark fails the 1:1 test and triggers § 350.4(i) supervisory escalation. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function runs a daily category-eligibility screen with 2nd Line attestation; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(e).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(8)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCredit-extension risk: an FDIC-supervised PPSI that extends credit (directly or indirectly through a parent IDI line) to customers for the purpose of purchasing payment stablecoins violates § 350.3(b)(8). The FDIC views this as creating a highly-leveraged-balance-sheet exposure that undermines reserve resiliency and is a structural prohibition — not merely a reserve-quality concern. This provision has no parallel in the OCC NPRM and must be confirmed in IDI-subsidiary credit policies.
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(3); implements GENIUS Act § 4(e) (12 U.S.C. 5903(e)) and FDI Act § 18(a)(4) (12 U.S.C. 1828(a)(4), 12 CFR part 328)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDeposit-insurance-misrepresentation risk: an IDI-subsidiary PPSI whose marketing creates a reasonable-person impression of pass-through FDIC coverage to stablecoin holders simultaneously violates § 350.3(b)(3), FDI Act § 18(a)(4), and 12 CFR part 328 — exposing the parent IDI and the subsidiary to civil money penalty and FDIC enforcement; disclaimers do not cure misleading representations or implications.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(2); implements GENIUS Act § 4(e)(2) (12 U.S.C. 5903(e)(2))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDeceptive-marketing risk: marketing that creates a reasonable-person impression the payment stablecoin is legal tender, issued by the United States, or guaranteed or approved by the U.S. Government breaches § 350.3(b)(2) implementing GENIUS Act § 4(e)(2). General disclaimers do not cure misleading representations. The 2nd Line compliance function reviews marketing materials against the reasonable-person standard before publication; the 1st Line marketing function honors the boundary. Per § 350.3(b)(2) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(5); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(2) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(2))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRehypothecation risk: any pledge, rehypothecation, or reuse of reserve assets outside the three § 4(a)(2) exceptions — including indirect through a custodian, an affiliate of a custodian, or a sub-custodian — is a statutory violation. The FDIC requires PPSI prior written approval (vs. OCC's pre-approval pattern) for any repurchase agreement that is not SEC-cleared.
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(7); implements GENIUS Act § 4(e)(3)(A) (12 U.S.C. 5903(e)(3)(A))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDeceptive-marketing risk: marketing a product in the U.S. as a payment stablecoin, or issuing a payment stablecoin, outside compliance with the GENIUS Act and Part 350 breaches § 350.3(b)(7) implementing GENIUS Act § 4(e)(3)(A). FDIC monitoring is continuous and produces Treasury referrals for unauthorized issuance. The 1st Line marketing function honors the perimeter; the 2nd Line compliance function reviews launch materials before publication. Per § 350.3(b)(7) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.7FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRegulatory-reporting risk: missed or inaccurate quarterly § 350.7 submissions — or omission of PPSI reserve-asset detail from the parent IDI's Call Report under GAAP — deprives the FDIC of the supervisory data stream that anchors examination scoping and peer comparison. **Impact:** examination findings, restated Call Reports, and § 39 safety-and-soundness criticism transmitted up to the parent IDI. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line operations function locks the quarterly close timeline against the § 350.7 submission window, with 2nd Line regulatory-reporting review of the Call Report mapping; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.7.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(a)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceConvertibility-at-par risk: a redemption policy that omits any of the five § 350.5(a) elements — timing, FDIC-only-discretionary-limitations statement, extension circumstances, holder instructions, or a minimum no greater than one stablecoin — degrades the public commitment that anchors the at-par redemption obligation and exposes the PPSI to deceptive-practice claims when holders are denied on undisclosed terms. **Impact:** FDIC supervisory action plus civil-money penalty. **Recommendation:** the 2nd Line compliance function locks the disclosure template against the five enumerated elements and re-attests on every update; target a defined (CMMI level 3) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(a).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(b); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(B) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(B))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRedemption-timeliness risk: a PPSI that fails to redeem within the two-business-day maximum under § 350.5(b)(1) — or imposes its own discretionary limitations rather than awaiting FDIC direction — breaks the statutory timely-redemption obligation that operationalizes GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(B). **Impact:** civil-money penalty exposure and run-risk transmission as holders price the slippage into market discount. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line operations function pre-stages monetization channels for T+0/T+1 redemption execution, with 2nd Line compliance monitoring the SLA against the two-business-day ceiling; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(b).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(a); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(A))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-shortfall risk: any failure of identifiability, 1:1 backing, or eligible-FI custody triggers the FDIC discretionary tool set at § 350.4(i) — suspend or reduce issuance; require measures to increase reserves; or direct the PPSI to begin orderly redemption — and is reported up through the parent IDI's Call Report under GAAP.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(b)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-shortfall risk: amortized-cost or face-value treatment of reserve assets — other than U.S. coins and currency, which proposed § 350.4(b) carves out at face value — overstates the par-coverage ratio and lets a fair-value shortfall accumulate undetected against outstanding issuance value. **Impact:** the 1:1 backing calculation fails on next mark and triggers the § 350.4(i) FDIC discretionary toolkit. **Recommendation:** daily mark-to-market by the 1st Line treasury function against an independent pricing source, with 2nd Line compliance re-performance of the reconciliation; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(b).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(d)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceLiquidity-risk-treatment risk: an FDIC-supervised PPSI that cannot demonstrate operational ability to monetize reserves at fair value on short notice — through counterparty repo lines, MMF redemption channels, or a parent-IDI funding arrangement per § 350.4(d) — has paper reserves, not redemption capacity. **Impact:** redemption-window failure under stress and primary-supervisor escalation under § 350.4(i). **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function tests every monetization channel quarterly on an ordinary-course basis, with 2nd Line liquidity-function review; target a defined (CMMI level 3) capability maturity at minimum. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(d).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(f); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iii))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-concentration risk: counterparty exposure to any one eligible financial institution exceeding the 40% cap under § 350.4(f) — measured across parents, subsidiaries, and affiliates of the institution, and across all brands of the PPSI's payment stablecoins — breaches the diversification rule and concentrates redemption-cycle credit risk on a single custodial counterparty. **Impact:** examination finding and FDIC supervisory escalation. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function measures aggregate parent/subsidiary/affiliate exposure daily, with 2nd Line concentration-limit attestation; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(f).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(i)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-shortfall escalation risk: an FDIC-supervised PPSI that fails to immediately notify upon discovery (or upon reasonable grounds to suspect) a reserve deficiency hands the FDIC discretion to suspend issuance, require capital increase, or direct orderly redemption — and exposes the parent IDI to direct safety-and-soundness consequences flowing up through the IDI capital and supervisory plan.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(b); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iv) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iv))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceIT-and-security risk: an FDIC-supervised PPSI lacking the principles-based IT risk management framework — particularly smart-contract independent validation or private-key management procedures — exposes the parent IDI to FDIC § 39 safety-and-soundness MRA/MRIA findings, and any unauthorized access to nonpublic personal customer information triggers customer-notification obligations.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(c)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRun risk: aggregate redemption requests exceeding the 10% / 24-hour significant-redemption-request threshold under § 350.5(c) without immediate FDIC notification deprives the supervisor of stress-event line of sight and forfeits the issuer's right to request an extension of the two-business-day window. **Impact:** unmanaged outflow accelerates into reserve-shortfall escalation under § 350.4(i) and supervisory enforcement on the inadequate-monitoring finding. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line operations function streams real-time redemption aggregation against outstanding issuance value to a 2nd Line escalation dashboard, with automated FDIC notification at threshold crossing; target an optimized (CMMI level 5) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(c).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR Part 350, Subpart B; implements GENIUS Act § 10 (12 U.S.C. 5909)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDigital-asset-custody risk: an FDIC-supervised custodian that fails to separately account for each covered customer's covered assets — payment-stablecoin reserves, payment stablecoins used as collateral, or issuance private keys — or to protect those assets from claims of the custodian's and any sub-custodian's creditors per Subpart B, treats covered assets as the custodian's own property. **Impact:** insolvency-segregation failure exposes covered customers to creditor claims and forfeits GENIUS Act § 7 bankruptcy-remoteness for the underlying reserves. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line custody-operations function maintains per-customer ledger segregation with 2nd Line attestation of the written policies; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR Part 350, Subpart B.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
GENIUS Act §7; 11 U.S.C. amended; Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceReserve-segregation risk: failure of the 1LoD treasury function to maintain reserve assets in segregated form qualifying for the GENIUS Act § 7 bankruptcy-estate exclusion — and to retain 2LoD oversight of custody at qualified custodians — would, in an insolvency, allow general unsecured creditors to claim against reserves, frustrate the statute's holder-protection design, expose holders to redemption loss, and condition trustee-led enforcement. Per GENIUS Act § 7 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
GENIUS Act §6(c); Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceRedemption-policy-disclosure risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to publish — and the 1LoD operations function to honor on at-par terms — the issuer's redemption procedures under GENIUS Act § 6(c), including timing, fees, and holder eligibility, exposes the issuer to civil-money penalty, conditions deceptive-practice claims by holders denied redemption on the disclosed terms, and supports primary-supervisor enforcement on misleading-disclosure grounds. Per GENIUS Act § 6(c) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
GENIUS Act §4(a)(1)(A); Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceReserve-backing-integrity risk: failure of the 1LoD treasury function to hold permitted reserve assets equal in fair value to 100% of outstanding payment-stablecoin liabilities under GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A), or to retain 2LoD compliance oversight of the daily reconciliation, breaches the reserve-asset obligation, exposes holders to redemption shortfall, and conditions immediate supervisory escalation by the primary federal regulator. Per GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
GENIUS Act §4(a)(1)(B); Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceStablecoin-reserve-quality risk: reserve composition that strays outside the six § 4(a)(1)(B) permitted categories — U.S. coins and Federal Reserve notes, IDI demand deposits, ≤93-day Treasuries, repurchase agreements backed by such Treasuries, MMF shares invested solely in the foregoing, or central-bank reserve deposits — breaks both Basel SCO60 HQLA classification and the statutory § 4 backing test. **Impact:** ineligible holdings disqualify reserves from the 1:1 backing calculation and trigger primary-supervisor escalation. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function runs a daily eligibility screen against the enumerated list with 2nd Line attestation of every position; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity for the screen. Per GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(B); Basel SCO60.32.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
GENIUS Act §4(a)(1)(C); Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceReserve-rehypothecation-control risk: failure of the 1LoD treasury function to enforce the GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(C) rehypothecation prohibition on reserve assets — outside the narrow Treasury-bill short-term repo exception requiring approved CCP routing or prior regulator approval — converts segregated reserves into encumbered claims, exposes the issuer to civil-money penalty, supports primary-supervisor cease-and-desist exposure, and conditions holder-redemption-shortfall liability if encumbered reserves prove unrecoverable. Per GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(C) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.21; implements GENIUS Act § 10 (12 U.S.C. 5909)OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDigital-asset-custody risk: a covered custodian that fails to separately account for each covered customer's covered assets — reserves, payment stablecoins used as collateral, or issuance private keys — or to evidence written policies protecting those assets from the custodian's and any sub-custodian's creditors under § 15.21, treats covered assets as the custodian's own property. **Impact:** insolvency-segregation failure exposes covered customers to creditor claims and forfeits the bankruptcy-remoteness on the underlying reserves. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line custody-operations function holds per-customer ledger segregation with 2nd Line attestation of the written-policy set; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.21.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(d)OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-concentration risk: a ≥$25B PPSI that falls below the 0.5% insured-deposit floor on any business day — capped at $500M aggregate — concentrates large-issuer reserves outside the FDIC/NCUA-insured perimeter the rule deliberately spreads. **Impact:** § 15.11(d) breach, OCC examination finding, and the depository-system distribution objective is undermined for the largest issuers. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function maintains a board-approved per-IDI deposit allocation that holds the 0.5% floor against issuance-value growth, with 2nd Line review of headroom; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(d).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.22; implements GENIUS Act § 10(c) (12 U.S.C. 5909(c))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDigital-asset-custody risk: a covered custodian operating omnibus accounts that comingle multiple covered customers' covered assets without the safe-and-sound § 15.21(b) safeguards — written policies, sub-ledger identifiability, and operational controls — converts the omnibus structure from a permitted efficiency into a creditor-claim exposure. **Impact:** insolvency-segregation failure across the omnibus pool plus OCC examination criticism on the controls. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line custody-operations function maintains a per-customer sub-ledger reconciled daily to the omnibus balance, with 2nd Line attestation of the safe-and-sound controls; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.22.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(b); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A)(i)–(viii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(A))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceStablecoin-reserve-quality risk: any holding outside the eight enumerated § 15.11(b) categories — U.S. currency or Federal Reserve balances, IDI demand deposits, ≤93-day Treasuries, overnight repos, qualifying reverse repos, registered government MMF shares, OCC-approved alternative federal liquid assets, or tokenized forms of categories (1)/(3)/(6)/(7) — is ineligible regardless of credit quality. **Impact:** the § 15.11(a) backing calculation fails on next mark and triggers § 15.11(g) shortfall cascade. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function runs a daily category-eligibility screen, with 2nd Line attestation of every position; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(b).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(3); implements GENIUS Act § 4(e) (12 U.S.C. 5903(e))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forcePass-through-deposit-insurance risk: a PPSI that represents — directly or by implication — that payment stablecoins are backed by U.S. full faith and credit, guaranteed by the U.S. Government, or subject to Federal deposit or share insurance breaches § 15.10(c)(3) implementing GENIUS Act § 4(e). The implication standard is broader than disclaimer cures. The 1st Line marketing function honors the boundary; the 2nd Line reviews customer-facing content. Per § 15.10(c)(3) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(2); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(9) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(9))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDeceptive-marketing risk: marketing that creates a reasonable-person impression the payment stablecoin is legal tender under 31 U.S.C. 5103, issued by the United States, or guaranteed or approved by the U.S. Government breaches § 15.10(c)(2) implementing GENIUS Act § 4(a)(9). General disclaimers do not cure misleading representations. The 1st Line marketing function honors the boundary; the 2nd Line compliance function reviews materials against the reasonable-person standard before publication. Per § 15.10(c)(2) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(5); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(2) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(2))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRehypothecation risk: any pledge, rehypothecation, or reuse of reserve assets outside the three enumerated § 4(a)(2) exceptions — including indirect rehypothecation by a custodian — is a statutory violation. The 93-day Treasury-bill repo carve-out is the only liquidity path; longer maturities or non-Treasury collateral fall outside the exception and trigger OCC enforcement.
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(i); implements GENIUS Act § 6(a)(1) (12 U.S.C. 5905(a)(1))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRegulatory-reporting risk: missed or late § 15.14(i) submissions past the 30-day post-quarter deadline — covering income statement, balance sheet, reserves, capital, outstanding issuance value, and assets under custody — deprive the OCC of the Call-Report-equivalent supervisory data stream that anchors examination scoping and peer comparison. **Impact:** examination findings and supervisory enforcement on the reporting deficiency separate from any substantive deficiency. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line operations function locks the quarterly close timeline against the 30-day window, with 2nd Line regulatory-reporting review of OCC schedule mapping; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(i).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.12(a)–(c); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(B) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(B))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRedemption-timeliness risk: an OCC-supervised PPSI that fails to redeem within the two-business-day maximum under § 15.12(b)(1)(i) — or that fails to notify the OCC within 24 hours of crossing the 10% / 24-hour stress threshold under § 15.12(c)(4) — breaks the statutory timely-redemption obligation and forfeits eligibility for the seven-calendar-day extended window. **Impact:** civil-money penalty exposure plus run-risk acceleration into § 15.11(g). **Recommendation:** the 1st Line operations function pre-stages monetization for T+0/T+1 execution, with 2nd Line compliance maintaining the 24-hour OCC notification dashboard; target an optimized (CMMI level 5) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.12(a)–(c).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(a)(2)OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceLiquidity-risk-treatment risk: an OCC-supervised PPSI that cannot demonstrate operational monetization channels — outright sales, repo lines, or proportionate alternatives per § 15.11(a)(2) — proportionate to size and complexity has paper reserves, not redemption capacity. **Impact:** the next redemption-stress event accelerates into § 15.11(g) shortfall cascade and OCC examination criticism. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function tests every monetization channel ordinarily (not aspirationally), with 2nd Line liquidity review of channel adequacy against business-model run-rate; target a defined (CMMI level 3) capability maturity at minimum. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(a)(2).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(a)(1); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(A))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-shortfall risk: any deviation from identifiability, segregation, ≥1:1 fair-value backing, or eligible-FI custody is a statutory and supervisory violation. Reserve composition that falls below the outstanding issuance value at any month-end triggers § 15.11(g) notification within one business day; 15 consecutive business days of non-compliance triggers mandatory liquidation of reserves and redemption under § 15.11(g)(3).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(a)(3); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(3) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(3))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-shortfall risk: a PPSI that withdraws purported excess reserves outside the § 15.11(a)(3) attest-then-withdraw cadence — relying on its own bad-faith determination rather than the published prior-month-end report and § 15.11(f) examination — substitutes self-attestation for the registered-public-accounting-firm examination the rule requires. **Impact:** OCC examination finding and § 15.11(g) shortfall cascade if the withdrawal proves premature. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function executes reserve withdrawals only against the published prior-month-end attest, with 2nd Line compliance pre-clearance; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(a)(3).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(c); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iii))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-concentration risk: failure to meet the five-element § 15.11(c) safe-harbor — ≥10% demand-payable, ≥30% within five business days, ≤40% at any one eligible FI, ≤50% of daily-liquidity at any one eligible FI, ≤20-day weighted-average maturity — or to satisfy the principles-based diversification general requirement, concentrates credit, liquidity, interest-rate, and price risks. **Impact:** OCC examination finding plus § 15.11(g) shortfall cascade if concentration cracks under stress. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function measures each of the five vectors daily, with 2nd Line attestation; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity for the diversification engine. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(c).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(g)OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-shortfall risk: any business day on which reserves fall below the § 15.11(a) minimum without same-day OCC notification under § 15.11(g)(1) — or any continued issuance outside the cross-chain net-zero exception under § 15.11(g)(2) — exposes the PPSI to the 15-consecutive-business-day automatic liquidation trigger under § 15.11(g)(3). **Impact:** mandatory reserve liquidation, fee-free redemption, and supervisory enforcement. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function maintains an intra-day fair-value reconciliation with 2nd Line single-trigger OCC notification workflow, and a pre-staged § 15.12 liquidation runbook; target an optimized (CMMI level 5) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(g).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.13(b); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iv) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iv))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceOperational-resilience risk: an inadequate IT/security program — particularly weak private-key management, untested smart-contract controls, or absence of board-approved incident response — exposes the PPSI to safety-and-soundness MRA/MRIA citation under § 15.13(b), and any unauthorized access to sensitive customer information triggers § 15.13(b)(7) customer-notification obligations.
- also
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.23; implements GENIUS Act § 10(e) (12 U.S.C. 5909(e))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDigital-asset-custody risk: a PPSI that offers self-custody hardware or software but operationally controls — or holds itself out as controlling — customer payment stablecoins or private keys falls back inside Subpart C custody obligations under § 15.23, despite the carve-out's surface availability. **Impact:** unrecognized custodian status, full Subpart C remediation, and OCC examination criticism on the control representation. **Recommendation:** the 2nd Line compliance function maintains a written control-classification memo for every wallet, signer, or recovery product, with 1st Line operations honoring the carve-out boundary; target a defined (CMMI level 3) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.23.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(h)OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceExamination-readiness risk: missed or incomplete § 15.14(h) weekly confidential submissions — listed-blockchain inventory, outstanding issuance value, secondary-market activity, redemption volume and times, and reserve-asset detail per brand — deprive the OCC of the high-frequency on-chain supervisory feed that the rule treats as load-bearing for stress monitoring. **Impact:** examination criticism on the reporting deficiency plus supervisory escalation if gaps coincide with market stress. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line operations function automates the weekly extract against the OCC form template with 2nd Line completeness review; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(h).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OFAC Revised Guidance on Entities Owned by Persons Whose Property and Interests in Property Are Blocked (2014-08-13)OFAC Sanctions in force by July 18, 2026Beneficial-ownership sanctions risk: failure to apply the OFAC 50-Percent Rule — aggregating direct and indirect ownership by one or more blocked persons up to and across the 50% threshold — fails to identify entities that are themselves blocked by operation of law, allows transaction processing for sanctioned beneficial owners, and exposes the institution to IEEPA civil-penalty exposure and OFAC enforcement under the 2014 Revised Guidance. Per OFAC Guidance 2014-08-13 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
50 U.S.C. § 1705; 31 C.F.R. Part 501 Appendix AOFAC Sanctions in force by July 18, 2026OFAC-civil-penalty exposure risk: a transaction processed in violation of any IEEPA-based sanctions program — SDN list, sectoral, country, or secondary-sanctions program — exposes the institution to strict-liability civil-money penalty under 50 U.S.C. § 1705 of up to the statutory maximum per violation, with the Enforcement Guidelines at 31 C.F.R. Part 501 Appendix A driving aggravating-and-mitigating-factor analysis at settlement. Per 50 U.S.C. § 1705 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
50 U.S.C. § 1702 (IEEPA); E.O. 13224; 31 C.F.R. § 594.201OFAC Sanctions in force by July 18, 2026Sanctions-screening risk: failure of the 1LoD onboarding workflow and 2LoD sanctions-compliance program to screen every customer, beneficial owner, and counterparty wallet against the OFAC Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons list — and to re-screen on each list update — exposes the institution to IEEPA strict-liability civil-penalty exposure, OFAC enforcement under 31 C.F.R. § 501.701, and supervisory enforcement coordinated with the primary federal regulator. Per 31 C.F.R. § 594.201 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
17 C.F.R. § 240.15c3-3 (Customer Protection Rule)SEC in force by July 18, 2026Customer-protection custody risk: a broker-dealer holding customer securities or cash that fails to segregate fully-paid and excess-margin securities in §15c3-3-compliant custody locations — qualified-custodian banks, control-location depositories, or other §15c3-3(c) good-control sites — exposes the firm to SEC §15(b)(4) sanctions, surfaces customer-reserve computation findings under Rule 15c3-3(e), and conditions creditor-priority exposure in any subsequent Securities Investor Protection Act liquidation. Per 17 C.F.R. § 240.15c3-3 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
17 C.F.R. § 240.15c6-1 (as amended, Rel. No. 34-96930)SEC in force by July 18, 2026Trade-date-plus-one-settlement risk: a broker-dealer effecting transactions in covered securities that fails to settle by trade-date-plus-one under 17 C.F.R. § 240.15c6-1 as amended by Release No. 34-96930, exposes the firm to §15(b)(4) sanctions, undermines DTC continuous-net-settlement cycle integrity, and surfaces FINRA Rule 11860 close-out and buy-in obligations against the failing party. Per 17 C.F.R. § 240.15c6-1 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.240(a)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceProgrammable-enforcement risk: block · freeze · reject capability fails at one of three loci — (a) code-level (contract function missing or gated to the wrong principal), (b) operator-level (TMS or workflow fails to convert alerts into contract calls), or (c) protocol-level (chain validators miss the supervisory finality SLA). **Impact:** examination findings at each unevidenced mode and IEEPA civil-penalty exposure when the underlying transaction is sanctions-related. **Recommendation:** evidence all three modes — function-test report, detection-latency log, validator-set due-diligence memo. Per § 1033.240(a) and practitioner-source: OFAC · A Framework for OFAC Compliance Commitments (May 2019).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.240(b)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceLawful-order compliance risk: technical inability to seize, freeze, burn, or prevent transfer of issued payment stablecoins under a court or Federal-agency order — per proposed 31 CFR § 1033.240(b) — exposes the PPSI to direct civil-penalty exposure, supervisory enforcement by the primary federal or state payment-stablecoin regulator, and reputational impairment in subsequent licensing reviews; execution-latency on lawful orders is a discrete examination finding.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(b)(3)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceSanctions-controls risk: failure to identify, or to block or reject, sanctioned payment-stablecoin activity (primary or secondary market) — screening coverage spans SDN List, 50 Percent Rule, and sectoral lists per proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(b)(3) — constitutes a strict-liability sanctions violation enforceable under IEEPA; the technical-capability obligation is contemporaneous with the screening obligation, not aspirational, and exposes the operator to overlapping OFAC and primary-regulator enforcement.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1010.410(f); PPSI added at § 1010.410(e)(6)(i)(K)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceTravel-Rule transmission risk: payment-stablecoin transmittals of $3,000 or more without compliant originator and beneficiary information — IVMS 101 or compatible format per proposed 31 CFR § 1010.410(f) — breach the Recordkeeping and Travel Rule as applied to PPSIs, expose the operator to BSA civil-money penalty, and surface as FATF Recommendation 16 implementation gaps in mutual-evaluation reviews.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
2nd Line
Risk & Compliance — oversees
-
31 U.S.C. § 5311 note (USA PATRIOT Act §314); 31 C.F.R. §§ 1010.520, 1010.540BSA / FinCEN in force by July 18, 2026Information-sharing-compliance risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to respond to FinCEN 314(a) subject searches within the 14-day window under 31 CFR § 1010.520, or to operationalize 314(b) voluntary sharing under the statutory safe harbor codified at 31 CFR § 1010.540, exposes the institution to law-enforcement inquiry escalation, BSA civil-money penalty, and reputational exposure from publicly disclosed cooperation failures during cross-bank investigations. Per 31 CFR § 1010.520 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
31 C.F.R. § 1022.210 (MSBs); 31 C.F.R. § 1020.210 (banks); 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h)BSA / FinCEN in force by July 18, 2026AML/CFT program-deficiency risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to maintain a board-approved AML program meeting the four statutory pillars under 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h) — internal controls, designated AML compliance officer, ongoing training, and independent testing routed to the 3LoD layer — exposes the institution to BSA civil-money penalty, FinCEN enforcement, and recurring examination findings under primary federal supervisor review. Per 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 3rd 3rd Line
-
31 C.F.R. § 1022.220 (MSBs); 31 C.F.R. § 1020.220 (banks)BSA / FinCEN in force by July 18, 2026AML/CFT program-deficiency risk: failure of the 2LoD CIP component — verification of customer identity, recordkeeping of identifying information, and government-list screening required by 31 CFR § 1020.220 — fails the customer-identification pillar within the broader AML program under 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h)(2) and exposes the institution to BSA civil-money penalty, FinCEN enforcement, and adverse examination findings on customer onboarding controls. Per 31 CFR § 1020.220 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
31 C.F.R. § 1010.311; 31 U.S.C. § 5313BSA / FinCEN in force by July 18, 2026CTR-filing risk: failure of the 1LoD operations function to file Currency Transaction Reports for currency transactions exceeding $10,000 — including aggregated same-day transactions by or for the same person under 31 CFR § 1010.311 — within the 15-day window, or to retain 2LoD oversight of aggregation logic, exposes the institution to BSA civil-money penalty, FinCEN enforcement, and adverse examination findings on currency-reporting controls. Per 31 CFR § 1010.311 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
31 C.F.R. § 1010.610; 31 U.S.C. § 5318(i)BSA / FinCEN in force by July 18, 2026AML/CFT program-deficiency risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to maintain enhanced due diligence for correspondent accounts held for foreign financial institutions — including ownership identification, enhanced suspicious-activity scrutiny, and PEP-connection review under 31 U.S.C. § 5318(i) — exposes the institution to BSA civil-money penalty, FinCEN enforcement, and correspondent-banking de-risking by upstream counterparties citing inadequate program-level EDD. Per 31 U.S.C. § 5318(i) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
31 C.F.R. § 1020.320 (banks); 31 C.F.R. § 1022.320 (MSBs); 31 U.S.C. § 5318(g)BSA / FinCEN in force by July 18, 2026SAR-filing risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to file Suspicious Activity Reports within 30 days of detection (60 with subject-identification extension) under 31 CFR §§ 1020.320 and 1022.320 — covering transactions suspected to involve illicit funds, BSA-evasion patterns, or no apparent lawful purpose — exposes the institution to BSA civil-money penalty, FinCEN enforcement, and supervisory cease-and-desist exposure on the broader AML program. Per 31 CFR § 1020.320 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
31 C.F.R. § 1010.410(f); 31 C.F.R. § 1020.410(a)BSA / FinCEN in force by July 18, 2026Travel-Rule-compliance risk: failure of the 1LoD operations function to package and transmit prescribed originator and beneficiary information — name, address, account number, amount, execution date, and beneficiary institution — on transmittals of $3,000 or more under 31 CFR § 1010.410(f), or to retain 2LoD oversight of packaging integrity, exposes the institution to BSA civil-money penalty, FinCEN enforcement, and correspondent-bank de-risking. Per 31 CFR § 1010.410(f) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FATF Recommendation 15 Interpretive Note ¶4FATF R.15 in force by July 18, 2026AML/CFT program-deficiency risk: a VASP that fails to extend the full FATF Recommendations 10–21 program suite to its virtual-asset activity through its 2LoD compliance function — customer due diligence, recordkeeping, suspicious-transaction reporting, internal controls, training, and independent testing routed to the 3LoD layer — under R.15 Interpretive Note ¶4 surfaces in its member-jurisdiction AML statute enforcement and contributes to mutual-evaluation findings for that jurisdiction. Per FATF R.15 IN ¶4 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 3rd 3rd Line
-
FATF Recommendations 37–40 (as applied via R.15 Interpretive Note ¶9)FATF R.15 in force by July 18, 2026Compliance-program risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to maintain the cross-border cooperation pathways FATF R.15 Interpretive Note ¶9 (via R.37–R.40) presumes — mutual legal assistance response readiness, FIU-to-FIU information sharing, and supervisory cooperation on VA cases — exposes the VASP to delayed regulatory response, supervisory criticism in jurisdictions where customers reside, and member-jurisdiction mutual-evaluation findings on international-cooperation effectiveness. Per FATF R.15 IN ¶9 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FATF Recommendation 16 Interpretive Note ¶7FATF R.16 in force by July 18, 2026AML/CFT program-deficiency risk: failure of the 2LoD payments-compliance function at a beneficiary financial institution or beneficiary VASP to apply risk-based procedures for identifying missing-information transfers, to execute, reject, or suspend per those procedures, and to escalate suspect patterns to suspicious-transaction reporting under FATF R.16 Interpretive Note ¶7, exposes the institution to member-jurisdiction enforcement, beneficiary-side monitoring criticism, and elevated correspondent-banking de-risking probability. Per FATF R.16 IN ¶7 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FATF Recommendation 16 Interpretive Note ¶¶5–6FATF R.16 in force by July 18, 2026AML/CFT program-deficiency risk: failure of the 2LoD payments-compliance function at an ordering financial institution or originator VASP to ensure required and accurate originator and beneficiary information accompanies every R.16-in-scope transfer, to refuse execution where required information is missing, and to retain records for at least five years per FATF R.16 IN ¶¶5–6, exposes the institution to member-jurisdiction enforcement and correspondent-banking de-risking on the originator side. Per FATF R.16 IN ¶¶5–6 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(c); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iv) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iv))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCompliance-program risk: failure of the 2LoD BSA and sanctions-compliance function to maintain the principles-based program required by § 350.6(c) — which implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iv) and runs in coordination with the joint Treasury/FinCEN/OFAC rulemaking (FR 2026-06963) — exposes the PPSI to overlapping FDIC § 39 safety-and-soundness criticism, BSA civil-money penalty, and OFAC strict-liability sanctions exposure. Per § 350.6(c) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), FR 18535; implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(B) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(B))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceSupervisory-coordination risk: an IDI-subsidiary PPSI that addresses the FDIC framework in isolation from the OCC's Part 15 NPRM and the joint Treasury/FinCEN/OFAC FR 2026-06963 rulemaking — implementing GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(B) coordination — surfaces conflicting interpretations across primary supervisors and BSA/sanctions overlays. **Impact:** divergent examination findings, duplicative remediation, and forced realignment by the lead supervisor. **Recommendation:** the 2nd Line compliance function maintains a single cross-framework control matrix reconciled to each rulemaking's operative paragraph; target a defined (CMMI level 3) capability maturity. Per FR 18535 and proposed 12 CFR Part 350.
- also
- EA External Assurance
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.1 — "outstanding issuance value"FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceOutstanding-issuance-measurement risk: failure of the 1LoD operations function to maintain real-time measurement of consolidated par value under proposed 12 CFR § 350.1 — the load-bearing figure for reserve-coverage calculation, GENIUS Act § 5(c) tier-classification, redemption thresholds, and brand-aggregated reporting — and 2LoD compliance oversight of the measurement methodology, exposes the institution to misreporting findings, civil-money penalty, and conditions forced supervisory recalculation at primary-regulator initiation. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.1 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.1 — "significant redemption request"FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRedemption-stress-threshold risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to track aggregate redemption requests against the proposed 12 CFR § 350.1 significant-redemption-request threshold — the 10% / 24-hour trigger activating § 350.5(c) FDIC notification — exposes the institution to delayed regulatory escalation during a stress event, conditions reputational damage from late disclosure, and supports primary-supervisor enforcement on inadequate redemption-monitoring controls. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.1 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(c)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-shortfall risk: a PPSI issuing more than one brand that comingles reserve pools without prior FDIC written approval per § 350.4(c) loses the per-brand identifiability the rule requires, breaks the brand-level § 350.4(a) backing test, and exposes one brand's holders to another brand's redemption pressure. **Impact:** § 350.4(i) discretionary toolkit fires against the comingled pool. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line operations function tags every reserve position to its brand at the custodian-account level, with 2nd Line compliance reconciliation; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(c).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(g); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(C) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(C))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forcePer-brand disclosure-failure risk: a PPSI that issues multiple brands but publishes a single aggregated composition report, or that omits average-tenor or geographic-location-of-custody columns from the § 350.4(g) table 1 template, fails the implementation of GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(C) and is subject to FDIC supervisory action.
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), FR 18535, amendments to 12 CFR Part 330FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forcePass-through-misrepresentation risk: any PPSI or IDI-affiliate communication implying that stablecoin holders enjoy pass-through FDIC coverage on reserves is a direct violation of the Part 330 amendment and § 350.3(b)(3). The FDIC operative policy is unambiguous: corporate-deposit treatment at the PPSI level only — holders bear the credit risk on the issuer and the eligible financial institution.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), FR 18535, amendments to 12 CFR Part 330; implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A)(viii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(A)(viii))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceTokenized-deposit-misclassification risk: an IDI that issues 'deposit tokens' but represents them as payment stablecoins (or vice versa) faces a classification challenge under § 350.1 and Part 330. Tokenized deposits are a deposit liability of the IDI insured under standard Part 330 categories; payment stablecoins are not deposits and reserves backing them carry corporate-deposit treatment only.
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(e); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(A))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceStablecoin-reserve-quality risk: any holding outside the seven enumerated § 350.4(e) categories — U.S. coins/currency, Federal Reserve balances, IDI demand deposits, ≤93-day Treasuries, overnight repos backed by such Treasuries, qualifying reverse repos, or registered government MMF shares — is ineligible and disqualified from the § 350.4(a) backing calculation regardless of credit quality. **Impact:** the next mark fails the 1:1 test and triggers § 350.4(i) supervisory escalation. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function runs a daily category-eligibility screen with 2nd Line attestation; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(e).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(a)(1)–(4); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(7) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(7))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCharter-applicability risk: an FDIC-supervised PPSI that conducts activity outside the four § 350.3(a)(1)–(4) core categories — issuance, redemption, reserve management, or covered-asset custody — operates outside its sanctioned activity perimeter implementing GENIUS Act § 4(a)(7). Custody of non-payment-stablecoin digital assets is a particular trap. The Governing Body must enforce the activity-perimeter gate; the 2nd Line compliance function reviews new products against the perimeter. Per § 350.3(a)(1)–(4) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(a)(5)–(8); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(7)(A)(v) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(7)(A)(v))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCharter-applicability risk: a PPSI that conducts supporting activity outside the § 350.3(a)(5)–(8) categories — fee assessment, wallet infrastructure hosting, principal/agent token activity, and other FDIC-approved support — without FDIC approval under (a)(8), engages in activity that fails the 'directly support' test in § 4(a)(7)(A)(v). The Governing Body must enforce the perimeter; the 2nd Line compliance function pre-clears new supporting-activity proposals. Per § 350.3(a)(5)–(8) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(1); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(9) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(9))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDeceptive-marketing risk: a PPSI brand name combining 'United States,' 'United States Government,' 'USG,' or equivalent USG-suggesting terms — outside the currency-abbreviation carve-out in § 350.3(c) — breaches § 350.3(b)(1) implementing GENIUS Act § 4(a)(9). The 2nd Line compliance function locks the brand-name standard; the Governing Body approves any name with USG-adjacent vocabulary. Exposes the PPSI and parent IDI to FDIC action. Per § 350.3(b)(1) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(6); implements GENIUS Act § 4(h)(1) (12 U.S.C. 5903(h))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCharter-applicability risk: any activity the FDIC determines to be an evasion of § 4 of the GENIUS Act or Part 350 — structured to formally satisfy a rule while defeating its purpose — is prohibited under § 350.3(b)(6) implementing GENIUS Act § 4(h)(1). Evasion exposure is substance-over-form and a discrete examination enforcement hook. The Governing Body owns the perimeter; the 2nd Line compliance function reviews creative structuring. Per § 350.3(b)(6) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(4); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(11) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(11))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceYield-evasion risk: any affiliate or related-third-party (including white-label-partner) arrangement that channels interest or yield to PPSI holders triggers the FDIC's rebuttable presumption under § 350.3(b)(4); failure to rebut with written materials produces a statutory violation of GENIUS Act § 4(a)(11), an IDI safety-and-soundness finding for the parent IDI, and FDIC enforcement.
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(3); implements GENIUS Act § 4(e) (12 U.S.C. 5903(e)) and FDI Act § 18(a)(4) (12 U.S.C. 1828(a)(4), 12 CFR part 328)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDeposit-insurance-misrepresentation risk: an IDI-subsidiary PPSI whose marketing creates a reasonable-person impression of pass-through FDIC coverage to stablecoin holders simultaneously violates § 350.3(b)(3), FDI Act § 18(a)(4), and 12 CFR part 328 — exposing the parent IDI and the subsidiary to civil money penalty and FDIC enforcement; disclaimers do not cure misleading representations or implications.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(2); implements GENIUS Act § 4(e)(2) (12 U.S.C. 5903(e)(2))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDeceptive-marketing risk: marketing that creates a reasonable-person impression the payment stablecoin is legal tender, issued by the United States, or guaranteed or approved by the U.S. Government breaches § 350.3(b)(2) implementing GENIUS Act § 4(e)(2). General disclaimers do not cure misleading representations. The 2nd Line compliance function reviews marketing materials against the reasonable-person standard before publication; the 1st Line marketing function honors the boundary. Per § 350.3(b)(2) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.3(b)(7); implements GENIUS Act § 4(e)(3)(A) (12 U.S.C. 5903(e)(3)(A))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDeceptive-marketing risk: marketing a product in the U.S. as a payment stablecoin, or issuing a payment stablecoin, outside compliance with the GENIUS Act and Part 350 breaches § 350.3(b)(7) implementing GENIUS Act § 4(e)(3)(A). FDIC monitoring is continuous and produces Treasury referrals for unauthorized issuance. The 1st Line marketing function honors the perimeter; the 2nd Line compliance function reviews launch materials before publication. Per § 350.3(b)(7) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.7FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRegulatory-reporting risk: missed or inaccurate quarterly § 350.7 submissions — or omission of PPSI reserve-asset detail from the parent IDI's Call Report under GAAP — deprives the FDIC of the supervisory data stream that anchors examination scoping and peer comparison. **Impact:** examination findings, restated Call Reports, and § 39 safety-and-soundness criticism transmitted up to the parent IDI. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line operations function locks the quarterly close timeline against the § 350.7 submission window, with 2nd Line regulatory-reporting review of the Call Report mapping; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.7.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(d)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceConvertibility-at-par risk: failure to publicly disclose the four § 350.5(d)(1) elements — issuing PPSI name, the par-redemption obligation statement, a link to the § 350.4(g) monthly composition report, and all purchase/redemption fees — or to give seven calendar days' prior notice of any update, conceals the entity that owes the redemption obligation and the fees that net against par. **Impact:** deceptive-practice exposure and FDIC supervisory action on the disclosure deficiency. **Recommendation:** the 2nd Line compliance function locks the disclosure template against the four enumerated elements and enforces the seven-day change-control window; target a defined (CMMI level 3) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(d).
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(a)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceConvertibility-at-par risk: a redemption policy that omits any of the five § 350.5(a) elements — timing, FDIC-only-discretionary-limitations statement, extension circumstances, holder instructions, or a minimum no greater than one stablecoin — degrades the public commitment that anchors the at-par redemption obligation and exposes the PPSI to deceptive-practice claims when holders are denied on undisclosed terms. **Impact:** FDIC supervisory action plus civil-money penalty. **Recommendation:** the 2nd Line compliance function locks the disclosure template against the five enumerated elements and re-attests on every update; target a defined (CMMI level 3) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(a).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(b); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(B) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(B))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRedemption-timeliness risk: a PPSI that fails to redeem within the two-business-day maximum under § 350.5(b)(1) — or imposes its own discretionary limitations rather than awaiting FDIC direction — breaks the statutory timely-redemption obligation that operationalizes GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(B). **Impact:** civil-money penalty exposure and run-risk transmission as holders price the slippage into market discount. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line operations function pre-stages monetization channels for T+0/T+1 redemption execution, with 2nd Line compliance monitoring the SLA against the two-business-day ceiling; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(b).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(a); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(A))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-shortfall risk: any failure of identifiability, 1:1 backing, or eligible-FI custody triggers the FDIC discretionary tool set at § 350.4(i) — suspend or reduce issuance; require measures to increase reserves; or direct the PPSI to begin orderly redemption — and is reported up through the parent IDI's Call Report under GAAP.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(b)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-shortfall risk: amortized-cost or face-value treatment of reserve assets — other than U.S. coins and currency, which proposed § 350.4(b) carves out at face value — overstates the par-coverage ratio and lets a fair-value shortfall accumulate undetected against outstanding issuance value. **Impact:** the 1:1 backing calculation fails on next mark and triggers the § 350.4(i) FDIC discretionary toolkit. **Recommendation:** daily mark-to-market by the 1st Line treasury function against an independent pricing source, with 2nd Line compliance re-performance of the reconciliation; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(b).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(d)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceLiquidity-risk-treatment risk: an FDIC-supervised PPSI that cannot demonstrate operational ability to monetize reserves at fair value on short notice — through counterparty repo lines, MMF redemption channels, or a parent-IDI funding arrangement per § 350.4(d) — has paper reserves, not redemption capacity. **Impact:** redemption-window failure under stress and primary-supervisor escalation under § 350.4(i). **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function tests every monetization channel quarterly on an ordinary-course basis, with 2nd Line liquidity-function review; target a defined (CMMI level 3) capability maturity at minimum. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(d).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(f); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iii))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-concentration risk: counterparty exposure to any one eligible financial institution exceeding the 40% cap under § 350.4(f) — measured across parents, subsidiaries, and affiliates of the institution, and across all brands of the PPSI's payment stablecoins — breaches the diversification rule and concentrates redemption-cycle credit risk on a single custodial counterparty. **Impact:** examination finding and FDIC supervisory escalation. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function measures aggregate parent/subsidiary/affiliate exposure daily, with 2nd Line concentration-limit attestation; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(f).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(i)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-shortfall escalation risk: an FDIC-supervised PPSI that fails to immediately notify upon discovery (or upon reasonable grounds to suspect) a reserve deficiency hands the FDIC discretion to suspend issuance, require capital increase, or direct orderly redemption — and exposes the parent IDI to direct safety-and-soundness consequences flowing up through the IDI capital and supervisory plan.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(j)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceOperational-resilience risk: absence of a board-adopted written restoration plan under § 350.4(j) — with reserve-monitoring trigger thresholds, pre-arranged funding sources, a designated authority chain, and the 2LoD escalation pathway from below-threshold alert to § 350.4(a) restoration — leaves the FDIC-supervised PPSI without the Governing-Body-blessed contingency scaffolding the FDIC presumes, and conditions FDIC discretionary intervention to begin orderly redemption under § 350.4(i). Per § 350.4(j) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(4)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceGoverning-body-oversight risk: board acceptance of asset-growth rates that outrun risk-management and operational capabilities — the dual-anchor obligation that the Governing Body sets growth tolerance and the 2LoD validates capability adequacy per § 350.6(a)(4) — exposes the parent IDI to § 39 safety-and-soundness criticism and surfaces under FDIC examination as the gap between approved growth plan and operational-capacity attestation. Per § 350.6(a)(4) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(5)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceGoverning-body-oversight risk: insider or affiliate transactions (other than with the parent IDI) that pose significant risk of material financial loss to the PPSI or are conducted on terms less favorable than arm's-length comparables — per § 350.6(a)(5)(i) — surface a failure of Governing-Body conflicts review and 2LoD related-party-transaction controls, exposing the parent IDI to § 39 safety-and-soundness findings and Sections 23A/23B-style scrutiny in examination. Per § 350.6(a)(5) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(3); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iii))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceInterest-rate-risk-management risk: absence of the 2LoD interest-rate-risk function tailored to PPSI size and balance-sheet complexity — including the impact of short-time-period rate increases on the fair value and monetization of interest-sensitive reserve assets per § 350.6(a)(3) — exposes the parent IDI to § 39 safety-and-soundness findings and compounds reserve-shortfall escalation risk under § 350.4(i). Per § 350.6(a)(3) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(2)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceInternal-audit-coverage risk: failure to maintain a 3LoD internal-audit function or, where size does not warrant a full function, an equivalent system of independent reviews of key internal controls per § 350.6(a)(2), forfeits independent verification of the 2LoD risk-management framework. Findings surface as FDIC examination criticism and shift reliance toward supervisory rather than independent assurance. Evidence: independent-review engagement letter and board-acknowledged findings register. Per § 350.6(a)(2) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 3rd 3rd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(1); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iii)–(iv) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iii)–(iv))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRisk-management-program risk: failure of the 2LoD risk-management function to maintain the five-part internal-controls and information-systems framework — organizational structure, risk assessment, financial-operational-regulatory reporting, asset safeguarding, and compliance-laws monitoring — required by § 350.6(a)(1) and adapted from 12 CFR part 364 Appendix A, exposes the parent IDI to FDIC § 39 safety-and-soundness MRA/MRIA findings and surfaces as recurring examination criticism. Per § 350.6(a)(1) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(b); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iv) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iv))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceIT-and-security risk: an FDIC-supervised PPSI lacking the principles-based IT risk management framework — particularly smart-contract independent validation or private-key management procedures — exposes the parent IDI to FDIC § 39 safety-and-soundness MRA/MRIA findings, and any unauthorized access to nonpublic personal customer information triggers customer-notification obligations.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(7); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(ii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(ii))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceLiquidity-risk-management risk: failure of the 2LoD liquidity function to monitor and validate § 350.4 reserve compliance and to manage liquidity in a manner appropriate to the PPSI's business model — per § 350.6(a)(7), which implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(ii) — compounds redemption-window and reserve-shortfall exposure, surfaces as FDIC examination criticism, and conditions FDIC discretionary intervention under § 350.4(i). Per § 350.6(a)(7) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(6)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceThird-party-risk-management risk: the 2LoD TPRM function's failure to conduct due diligence on selection, embed contractual flow-down of Part 350 obligations, or monitor performance per § 350.6(a)(6) — across custodians, oracles, smart-contract auditors, and screening providers — surfaces as FDIC examination criticism and shifts the PPSI's reserve-asset and IT-security risk profile onto an under-managed counterparty surface. Per § 350.6(a)(6) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(c)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRun risk: aggregate redemption requests exceeding the 10% / 24-hour significant-redemption-request threshold under § 350.5(c) without immediate FDIC notification deprives the supervisor of stress-event line of sight and forfeits the issuer's right to request an extension of the two-business-day window. **Impact:** unmanaged outflow accelerates into reserve-shortfall escalation under § 350.4(i) and supervisory enforcement on the inadequate-monitoring finding. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line operations function streams real-time redemption aggregation against outstanding issuance value to a 2nd Line escalation dashboard, with automated FDIC notification at threshold crossing; target an optimized (CMMI level 5) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.5(c).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR Part 350, Subpart B; implements GENIUS Act § 10 (12 U.S.C. 5909)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDigital-asset-custody risk: an FDIC-supervised custodian that fails to separately account for each covered customer's covered assets — payment-stablecoin reserves, payment stablecoins used as collateral, or issuance private keys — or to protect those assets from claims of the custodian's and any sub-custodian's creditors per Subpart B, treats covered assets as the custodian's own property. **Impact:** insolvency-segregation failure exposes covered customers to creditor claims and forfeits GENIUS Act § 7 bankruptcy-remoteness for the underlying reserves. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line custody-operations function maintains per-customer ledger segregation with 2nd Line attestation of the written policies; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR Part 350, Subpart B.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FSB High-Level Recommendation 5 (2023-07-17)FSB GSC in force by July 18, 2026Risk-management-program risk: a GSC arrangement whose 2LoD risk function does not embed reserve-asset safeguarding, operational resilience including cybersecurity safeguards, AML/CFT measures, and fit-and-proper screening of officers and owners into policies, procedures, systems, and the governance structure required by FSB High-Level Recommendation 5 (2023-07-17), surfaces regulatory-comparability findings, FSB peer-review criticism, and member-authority supervisory action where the gap intersects domestic prudential or AML statute. Per FSB GSC HLR 5 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FSB High-Level Recommendation 7 (2023-07-17)FSB GSC in force by July 18, 2026Operational-resilience risk: a GSC arrangement that lacks Governing-Body-adopted recovery and resolution plans enabling either through-stress continued operation or orderly wind-down without systemic disruption, and that does not embed the 2LoD testing-and-review cadence required by FSB High-Level Recommendation 7 (2023-07-17), exposes itself to regulatory-comparability findings, member-authority supervisory directives, and FSB peer-review criticism on resolvability — particularly where the arrangement is judged of global systemic significance. Per FSB GSC HLR 7 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
GENIUS Act §7; 11 U.S.C. amended; Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceReserve-segregation risk: failure of the 1LoD treasury function to maintain reserve assets in segregated form qualifying for the GENIUS Act § 7 bankruptcy-estate exclusion — and to retain 2LoD oversight of custody at qualified custodians — would, in an insolvency, allow general unsecured creditors to claim against reserves, frustrate the statute's holder-protection design, expose holders to redemption loss, and condition trustee-led enforcement. Per GENIUS Act § 7 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
GENIUS Act §11(b); Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceThird-party-risk-management risk: the 2LoD TPRM function's failure to verify that all custodians of PPSI reserve assets, stablecoins-as-collateral, and issuance private keys are subject to federal or state banking-regulator oversight per GENIUS Act §11(b) — and to evidence the External-Assurance regulator-coordination posture — exposes the PPSI to statutory violation, supervisory enforcement, and the reserve-shortfall escalation pathway when an ineligible custodian fails. Per GENIUS Act §11(b) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- EA External Assurance
-
GENIUS Act §11(a); Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceCharter-applicability risk: a digital-asset service provider that offers a payment stablecoin in the U.S. after 2028-07-18 — where the stablecoin is not issued by a PPSI or authorized foreign issuer under § 11(a) — operates a prohibited distribution. Exposes the DASP to GENIUS Act enforcement and conditions venue-side delisting of any non-PPSI stablecoin. The Governing Body must operationalize the cutover ahead of the sunset. Per GENIUS Act § 11(a) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
GENIUS Act §6(a); Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceReserve-disclosure-reporting risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to publish the issuer's monthly reserve composition under GENIUS Act § 6(a) — including asset classification, fair value, executive certification, and PCAOB-registered examination opinion — within the statutory disclosure cadence, deprives holders, supervisors, and counterparties of attestation evidence, exposes the issuer to civil-money penalty, and conditions market-wide redemption pressure on the next disclosure cycle. Per GENIUS Act § 6(a) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
GENIUS Act §6(c); Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceRedemption-policy-disclosure risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to publish — and the 1LoD operations function to honor on at-par terms — the issuer's redemption procedures under GENIUS Act § 6(c), including timing, fees, and holder eligibility, exposes the issuer to civil-money penalty, conditions deceptive-practice claims by holders denied redemption on the disclosed terms, and supports primary-supervisor enforcement on misleading-disclosure grounds. Per GENIUS Act § 6(c) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
GENIUS Act §4(a)(1)(A); Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceReserve-backing-integrity risk: failure of the 1LoD treasury function to hold permitted reserve assets equal in fair value to 100% of outstanding payment-stablecoin liabilities under GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A), or to retain 2LoD compliance oversight of the daily reconciliation, breaches the reserve-asset obligation, exposes holders to redemption shortfall, and conditions immediate supervisory escalation by the primary federal regulator. Per GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
GENIUS Act §4(a)(1)(B); Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceStablecoin-reserve-quality risk: reserve composition that strays outside the six § 4(a)(1)(B) permitted categories — U.S. coins and Federal Reserve notes, IDI demand deposits, ≤93-day Treasuries, repurchase agreements backed by such Treasuries, MMF shares invested solely in the foregoing, or central-bank reserve deposits — breaks both Basel SCO60 HQLA classification and the statutory § 4 backing test. **Impact:** ineligible holdings disqualify reserves from the 1:1 backing calculation and trigger primary-supervisor escalation. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function runs a daily eligibility screen against the enumerated list with 2nd Line attestation of every position; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity for the screen. Per GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(B); Basel SCO60.32.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
GENIUS Act §10; Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act in force by July 18, 2026Compliance-program risk: absence of a 2LoD program meeting the Treasury-coordinated BSA, AML, and OFAC rule set issued under GENIUS Act §10 — operationalized by the Treasury/FinCEN/OFAC rulemaking at FR 2026-06963 (proposed 31 CFR Parts 1033 and 502) — exposes the PPSI to BSA civil-money penalty, OFAC strict-liability sanctions exposure, and supervisory enforcement coordinated between Treasury and the primary federal payment-stablecoin regulator. Per GENIUS Act §10 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.21; implements GENIUS Act § 10 (12 U.S.C. 5909)OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDigital-asset-custody risk: a covered custodian that fails to separately account for each covered customer's covered assets — reserves, payment stablecoins used as collateral, or issuance private keys — or to evidence written policies protecting those assets from the custodian's and any sub-custodian's creditors under § 15.21, treats covered assets as the custodian's own property. **Impact:** insolvency-segregation failure exposes covered customers to creditor claims and forfeits the bankruptcy-remoteness on the underlying reserves. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line custody-operations function holds per-customer ledger segregation with 2nd Line attestation of the written-policy set; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.21.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.41(a)(1)(i)(B); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(i) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(i))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCapital-adequacy risk: a de novo PPSI — or an SQPPSI within three years of transition — that falls below the $5M minimum floor under § 15.41(a)(1)(i)(B) lacks the cushion the OCC presumes adequate for initial operations (trust-bank precedent $6.05M–$25M). The Governing Body capitalizes and maintains the floor; the 2nd Line monitors headroom. Exposes the PPSI to OCC capital directives and § 15.33 revocation. Per § 15.41(a)(1)(i)(B) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(6); implements GENIUS Act § 4(h)(1) (12 U.S.C. 5903(h)(1))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCharter-applicability risk: any activity the OCC determines to be an evasion of GENIUS Act § 4 or Part 15 — structured to formally satisfy a rule while defeating its purpose — is prohibited under § 15.10(c)(6) implementing § 4(h)(1). Evasion is substance-over-form and a discrete examination enforcement hook. The Governing Body owns the perimeter; the 2nd Line reviews creative structuring. Per § 15.10(c)(6) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(a)–(d); implements GENIUS Act § 6(a)(3) and § 6(a)(4)(C) (12 U.S.C. 5905(a)(3), 5905(a)(4)(C))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceExamination-readiness risk: PPSIs >$1B outstanding issuance value or >$25B trading volume face annual full-scope examination; failure to maintain books and records 'in English' (§ 15.14(f)) or to grant prompt and complete access to officers, directors, employees, agents, and records (§ 15.14(b)) is a discrete supervisory finding separate from the underlying substantive violations.
- also
- EA External Assurance
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(d)OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-concentration risk: a ≥$25B PPSI that falls below the 0.5% insured-deposit floor on any business day — capped at $500M aggregate — concentrates large-issuer reserves outside the FDIC/NCUA-insured perimeter the rule deliberately spreads. **Impact:** § 15.11(d) breach, OCC examination finding, and the depository-system distribution objective is undermined for the largest issuers. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function maintains a board-approved per-IDI deposit allocation that holds the 0.5% floor against issuance-value growth, with 2nd Line review of headroom; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(d).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(e); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(C) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(C))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDisclosure-failure risk: a missed monthly composition report by noon on the last day of the month, or a report that omits fair-value, average tenor, or geographic-location columns, is a discrete examination finding and constitutes non-compliance with § 4(a)(1)(C) of the GENIUS Act and § 15.11(e); chronic non-compliance triggers § 15.11(g)(4) compliance plan or order to liquidate.
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.22; implements GENIUS Act § 10(c) (12 U.S.C. 5909(c))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDigital-asset-custody risk: a covered custodian operating omnibus accounts that comingle multiple covered customers' covered assets without the safe-and-sound § 15.21(b) safeguards — written policies, sub-ledger identifiability, and operational controls — converts the omnibus structure from a permitted efficiency into a creditor-claim exposure. **Impact:** insolvency-segregation failure across the omnibus pool plus OCC examination criticism on the controls. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line custody-operations function maintains a per-customer sub-ledger reconciled daily to the omnibus balance, with 2nd Line attestation of the safe-and-sound controls; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.22.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.41; implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(i) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(i))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCapital-adequacy risk: a PPSI that fails to demonstrate operating-history-adjusted minimum capital under the individualized § 15.41 approach — or that allows capital to fall below the OCC-set requirement — exposes itself to OCC capital directives, PCA-style supervisory action under amended Part 6, and ultimately revocation under § 15.33.
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(b); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A)(i)–(viii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(A))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceStablecoin-reserve-quality risk: any holding outside the eight enumerated § 15.11(b) categories — U.S. currency or Federal Reserve balances, IDI demand deposits, ≤93-day Treasuries, overnight repos, qualifying reverse repos, registered government MMF shares, OCC-approved alternative federal liquid assets, or tokenized forms of categories (1)/(3)/(6)/(7) — is ineligible regardless of credit quality. **Impact:** the § 15.11(a) backing calculation fails on next mark and triggers § 15.11(g) shortfall cascade. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function runs a daily category-eligibility screen, with 2nd Line attestation of every position; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(b).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(a); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(7) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(7))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCharter-applicability risk: a PPSI that engages in activity outside the eight § 15.10(a) categories — issuance, redemption, reserve management, covered-asset custody, fees, principal/agent activity, gas fees, and OCC-blessed directly-supporting activity — operates outside its sanctioned activity perimeter. The Governing Body owns the perimeter; the 2nd Line compliance function pre-clears new products. Exposes the PPSI to OCC supervisory action and § 15.33 revocation. Per § 15.10(a) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.30; implements GENIUS Act § 5(c)–(d) (12 U.S.C. 5904(c)–(d))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceApplication-deficiency risk: a § 15.30(b)(3)(i) filing that lacks Interagency Biographical and Financial Report submissions for every director, executive officer, and principal shareholder, or that contains a material misrepresentation under § 15.30(b)(1)(iii), is grounds for OCC denial under § 15.30(d) or nullification under § 15.30(g)(1).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(1); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(9) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(9))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDeceptive-marketing risk: a PPSI brand name combining 'United States,' 'United States Government,' 'USG,' or any equivalent USG-suggesting combination — outside the currency-abbreviation carve-out — breaches § 15.10(c)(1) implementing GENIUS Act § 4(a)(9). The 2nd Line compliance function locks the brand-name standard; the Governing Body approves any name with USG-adjacent vocabulary. Exposes the PPSI to OCC supervisory action and § 15.33 revocation. Per § 15.10(c)(1) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(4); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(11) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(11))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceYield-evasion risk: an affiliate or related-third-party arrangement that pays yield to PPSI holders triggers a rebuttable presumption of evasion under § 15.10(c)(4)(i); failure to rebut with documentary evidence produces a statutory violation of § 4(a)(11) and exposes the PPSI to OCC enforcement and supervisory action.
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(3); implements GENIUS Act § 4(e) (12 U.S.C. 5903(e))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forcePass-through-deposit-insurance risk: a PPSI that represents — directly or by implication — that payment stablecoins are backed by U.S. full faith and credit, guaranteed by the U.S. Government, or subject to Federal deposit or share insurance breaches § 15.10(c)(3) implementing GENIUS Act § 4(e). The implication standard is broader than disclaimer cures. The 1st Line marketing function honors the boundary; the 2nd Line reviews customer-facing content. Per § 15.10(c)(3) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.10(c)(2); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(9) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(9))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDeceptive-marketing risk: marketing that creates a reasonable-person impression the payment stablecoin is legal tender under 31 U.S.C. 5103, issued by the United States, or guaranteed or approved by the U.S. Government breaches § 15.10(c)(2) implementing GENIUS Act § 4(a)(9). General disclaimers do not cure misleading representations. The 1st Line marketing function honors the boundary; the 2nd Line compliance function reviews materials against the reasonable-person standard before publication. Per § 15.10(c)(2) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(i); implements GENIUS Act § 6(a)(1) (12 U.S.C. 5905(a)(1))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRegulatory-reporting risk: missed or late § 15.14(i) submissions past the 30-day post-quarter deadline — covering income statement, balance sheet, reserves, capital, outstanding issuance value, and assets under custody — deprive the OCC of the Call-Report-equivalent supervisory data stream that anchors examination scoping and peer comparison. **Impact:** examination findings and supervisory enforcement on the reporting deficiency separate from any substantive deficiency. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line operations function locks the quarterly close timeline against the 30-day window, with 2nd Line regulatory-reporting review of OCC schedule mapping; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(i).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.12(d); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(B) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(B))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceConvertibility-at-par risk: omission of any § 15.12(d)(1) element — issuing PPSI name, the par-redemption obligation statement, a link to the § 15.11(e) composition report, or the full fee schedule — or absence of seven calendar days' prior notice on an update under § 15.12(d)(2), conceals the entity that owes the redemption obligation and the net-of-fees par value. **Impact:** deceptive-practice exposure and OCC supervisory action. **Recommendation:** the 2nd Line compliance function locks the disclosure template and enforces the seven-day change-control window; target a defined (CMMI level 3) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.12(d).
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.12(a)–(c); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(B) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(B))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRedemption-timeliness risk: an OCC-supervised PPSI that fails to redeem within the two-business-day maximum under § 15.12(b)(1)(i) — or that fails to notify the OCC within 24 hours of crossing the 10% / 24-hour stress threshold under § 15.12(c)(4) — breaks the statutory timely-redemption obligation and forfeits eligibility for the seven-calendar-day extended window. **Impact:** civil-money penalty exposure plus run-risk acceleration into § 15.11(g). **Recommendation:** the 1st Line operations function pre-stages monetization for T+0/T+1 execution, with 2nd Line compliance maintaining the 24-hour OCC notification dashboard; target an optimized (CMMI level 5) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.12(a)–(c).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(a)(2)OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceLiquidity-risk-treatment risk: an OCC-supervised PPSI that cannot demonstrate operational monetization channels — outright sales, repo lines, or proportionate alternatives per § 15.11(a)(2) — proportionate to size and complexity has paper reserves, not redemption capacity. **Impact:** the next redemption-stress event accelerates into § 15.11(g) shortfall cascade and OCC examination criticism. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function tests every monetization channel ordinarily (not aspirationally), with 2nd Line liquidity review of channel adequacy against business-model run-rate; target a defined (CMMI level 3) capability maturity at minimum. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(a)(2).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(a)(1); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(1)(A) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(1)(A))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-shortfall risk: any deviation from identifiability, segregation, ≥1:1 fair-value backing, or eligible-FI custody is a statutory and supervisory violation. Reserve composition that falls below the outstanding issuance value at any month-end triggers § 15.11(g) notification within one business day; 15 consecutive business days of non-compliance triggers mandatory liquidation of reserves and redemption under § 15.11(g)(3).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(a)(3); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(3) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(3))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-shortfall risk: a PPSI that withdraws purported excess reserves outside the § 15.11(a)(3) attest-then-withdraw cadence — relying on its own bad-faith determination rather than the published prior-month-end report and § 15.11(f) examination — substitutes self-attestation for the registered-public-accounting-firm examination the rule requires. **Impact:** OCC examination finding and § 15.11(g) shortfall cascade if the withdrawal proves premature. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function executes reserve withdrawals only against the published prior-month-end attest, with 2nd Line compliance pre-clearance; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(a)(3).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(c); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iii))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-concentration risk: failure to meet the five-element § 15.11(c) safe-harbor — ≥10% demand-payable, ≥30% within five business days, ≤40% at any one eligible FI, ≤50% of daily-liquidity at any one eligible FI, ≤20-day weighted-average maturity — or to satisfy the principles-based diversification general requirement, concentrates credit, liquidity, interest-rate, and price risks. **Impact:** OCC examination finding plus § 15.11(g) shortfall cascade if concentration cracks under stress. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function measures each of the five vectors daily, with 2nd Line attestation; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity for the diversification engine. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(c).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(g)OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReserve-shortfall risk: any business day on which reserves fall below the § 15.11(a) minimum without same-day OCC notification under § 15.11(g)(1) — or any continued issuance outside the cross-chain net-zero exception under § 15.11(g)(2) — exposes the PPSI to the 15-consecutive-business-day automatic liquidation trigger under § 15.11(g)(3). **Impact:** mandatory reserve liquidation, fee-free redemption, and supervisory enforcement. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line treasury function maintains an intra-day fair-value reconciliation with 2nd Line single-trigger OCC notification workflow, and a pre-staged § 15.12 liquidation runbook; target an optimized (CMMI level 5) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(g).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.13(b); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iv) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iv))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceOperational-resilience risk: an inadequate IT/security program — particularly weak private-key management, untested smart-contract controls, or absence of board-approved incident response — exposes the PPSI to safety-and-soundness MRA/MRIA citation under § 15.13(b), and any unauthorized access to sensitive customer information triggers § 15.13(b)(7) customer-notification obligations.
- also
- GB Governing Body
- 1st 1st Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.13(a)(3); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iii) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iii))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceInterest-rate-risk-management risk: absence of the 2LoD interest-rate-risk function appropriate to PPSI size and balance-sheet complexity, including the periodic reporting cadence to management and the board required by § 15.13(a)(3), forfeits the Governing Body's line of sight into interest-rate sensitivity on monetizable reserve assets and surfaces as OCC examination criticism with downstream Part 6 PCA-style capital implications. Per § 15.13(a)(3) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.13(a)(1); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(A)(iv) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iv))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRisk-management-program risk: failure of the 2LoD risk-management function to maintain the five-part internal-controls and information-systems framework — segregated duties and clear authority lines, effective risk assessment, accurate financial-operational-regulatory reporting, asset safeguarding and monetization, and compliance-laws monitoring — required by § 15.13(a)(1) and modeled on 12 CFR Part 30 Appendix A, exposes the PPSI to OCC MRA/MRIA findings and recurring examination criticism. Per § 15.13(a)(1) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.23; implements GENIUS Act § 10(e) (12 U.S.C. 5909(e))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceDigital-asset-custody risk: a PPSI that offers self-custody hardware or software but operationally controls — or holds itself out as controlling — customer payment stablecoins or private keys falls back inside Subpart C custody obligations under § 15.23, despite the carve-out's surface availability. **Impact:** unrecognized custodian status, full Subpart C remediation, and OCC examination criticism on the control representation. **Recommendation:** the 2nd Line compliance function maintains a written control-classification memo for every wallet, signer, or recovery product, with 1st Line operations honoring the carve-out boundary; target a defined (CMMI level 3) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.23.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.13(a)(7)OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceThird-party-risk-management risk: the 2LoD TPRM function's failure to conduct due diligence on selection, embed contractual flow-down of Part 15 obligations, or monitor performance per § 15.13(a)(7) — across custodians, oracles, smart-contract auditors, and screening providers — surfaces as OCC examination criticism and shifts the PPSI's reserve-asset and IT-security risk profile onto an under-managed counterparty surface. Per § 15.13(a)(7) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(h)OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceExamination-readiness risk: missed or incomplete § 15.14(h) weekly confidential submissions — listed-blockchain inventory, outstanding issuance value, secondary-market activity, redemption volume and times, and reserve-asset detail per brand — deprive the OCC of the high-frequency on-chain supervisory feed that the rule treats as load-bearing for stress monitoring. **Impact:** examination criticism on the reporting deficiency plus supervisory escalation if gaps coincide with market stress. **Recommendation:** the 1st Line operations function automates the weekly extract against the OCC form template with 2nd Line completeness review; target a managed (CMMI level 4) capability maturity. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(h).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OFAC Revised Guidance on Entities Owned by Persons Whose Property and Interests in Property Are Blocked (2014-08-13)OFAC Sanctions in force by July 18, 2026Beneficial-ownership sanctions risk: failure to apply the OFAC 50-Percent Rule — aggregating direct and indirect ownership by one or more blocked persons up to and across the 50% threshold — fails to identify entities that are themselves blocked by operation of law, allows transaction processing for sanctioned beneficial owners, and exposes the institution to IEEPA civil-penalty exposure and OFAC enforcement under the 2014 Revised Guidance. Per OFAC Guidance 2014-08-13 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
50 U.S.C. § 1705; 31 C.F.R. Part 501 Appendix AOFAC Sanctions in force by July 18, 2026OFAC-civil-penalty exposure risk: a transaction processed in violation of any IEEPA-based sanctions program — SDN list, sectoral, country, or secondary-sanctions program — exposes the institution to strict-liability civil-money penalty under 50 U.S.C. § 1705 of up to the statutory maximum per violation, with the Enforcement Guidelines at 31 C.F.R. Part 501 Appendix A driving aggravating-and-mitigating-factor analysis at settlement. Per 50 U.S.C. § 1705 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
50 U.S.C. § 1702 (IEEPA); E.O. 13224; 31 C.F.R. § 594.201OFAC Sanctions in force by July 18, 2026Sanctions-screening risk: failure of the 1LoD onboarding workflow and 2LoD sanctions-compliance program to screen every customer, beneficial owner, and counterparty wallet against the OFAC Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons list — and to re-screen on each list update — exposes the institution to IEEPA strict-liability civil-penalty exposure, OFAC enforcement under 31 C.F.R. § 501.701, and supervisory enforcement coordinated with the primary federal regulator. Per 31 C.F.R. § 594.201 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
OFAC Sanctions Compliance Guidance for the Virtual Currency Industry (2021-10-15)OFAC Sanctions in force by July 18, 2026Virtual-currency-sanctions risk: failure to align the institution's sanctions-compliance program to the five-element framework expressed in OFAC's 2021 Sanctions Compliance Guidance for the Virtual Currency Industry — management commitment, risk assessment, internal controls, testing and audit, and training — surfaces examination findings, exposes blockchain-native counterparty processing to strict-liability IEEPA penalty under 50 U.S.C. § 1705, and conditions reputational impairment under OFAC enforcement-action publication. Per OFAC Virtual Currency Guidance (2021-10-15) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 3rd 3rd Line
-
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 §15(a); 17 C.F.R. § 240.15bSEC in force by July 18, 2026Broker-dealer-registration risk: a person or entity effecting securities transactions for the account of others, or buying and selling securities for its own account as part of a regular business under Exchange Act §15(a), without filing Form BD and maintaining FINRA membership, operates an unregistered broker-dealer subject to SEC enforcement, parallel FINRA disciplinary exposure under Rule 8000-series proceedings, and §29(b) rescission of transactions entered while unregistered. Per Exchange Act §15(a) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
17 C.F.R. §§ 242.300–242.304 (Regulation ATS)SEC in force by July 18, 2026Regulation-ATS-operating risk: an alternative trading system that operates a multilateral matching venue for any class of security without the Form ATS filing, fair-access program where the §301(b)(5) threshold is triggered, surveillance, and recordkeeping required by Reg ATS, forfeits the conditional Exchange Act §3(a)(1) exemption, exposes the venue to SEC §19(h) enforcement, and conditions unregistered-exchange liability for its broker-dealer participants. Per 17 C.F.R. §§ 242.300–242.304 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
17 C.F.R. § 240.15c3-3 (Customer Protection Rule)SEC in force by July 18, 2026Customer-protection custody risk: a broker-dealer holding customer securities or cash that fails to segregate fully-paid and excess-margin securities in §15c3-3-compliant custody locations — qualified-custodian banks, control-location depositories, or other §15c3-3(c) good-control sites — exposes the firm to SEC §15(b)(4) sanctions, surfaces customer-reserve computation findings under Rule 15c3-3(e), and conditions creditor-priority exposure in any subsequent Securities Investor Protection Act liquidation. Per 17 C.F.R. § 240.15c3-3 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.520Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAML-CFT-program risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to respond to FinCEN § 314(a) mandatory information requests within prescribed timelines per § 1033.520 — secure intake, account-search execution, and FinCEN response submission — leaves the law-enforcement intelligence channel uncovered for PPSI-issued payment stablecoins. Non-response exposes the PPSI to BSA civil-money penalty and recurring examination findings. Per § 1033.520 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.540Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAML-CFT-program risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to register for and exercise the § 314(b) voluntary information-sharing safe harbor per § 1033.540 — across other 314(b)-registered FIs and PPSIs — forfeits the cross-institutional pattern-detection layer that strengthens ML/TF identification across the regulated perimeter. The PPSI does not breach the rule by abstaining, but the absence of coverage surfaces as supervisory critique on cross-FI intelligence integration. Per § 1033.540 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.210(b)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCustomer-due-diligence risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to maintain an effective CIP-equivalent identification and due-diligence program for PPSI account holders — including high-value transaction identification and enhanced due diligence on higher-risk customers per § 1033.210(b) — fails one of the four 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h) AML pillars and surfaces as BSA examination criticism plus civil-money penalty exposure. Per § 1033.210(b) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.210(c)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAML-CFT-program risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to maintain the AML/CFT program through ongoing implementation — periodic risk-assessment updates, ongoing CDD, and prompt program updates on material ML/TF risk-profile change per § 1033.210(c) — lapses an effective program back into stagnation, and exposes the PPSI to BSA civil-money penalty plus recurring examination findings. Per § 1033.210(c) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.210(b)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAML/CFT program-deficiency risk: failure to designate a 2LoD BSA officer with day-to-day responsibility for the AML/CFT program — and with sufficient authority and resources to administer the program effectively per § 1033.210(b) — fails one of the four AML pillars under 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h), exposes the PPSI to BSA civil-money penalty, and is a recurring examination finding under primary federal or state regulator supervision. Per § 1033.210(b) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.210(a); implements 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h)(1)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAML/CFT program-deficiency risk: failure to maintain an effective program meeting 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h)(1) standards — covering internal controls, BSA officer designation, training, independent testing, customer due diligence, and AML/CFT National Priorities review — exposes the PPSI to BSA civil-money penalty, supervisory action by the primary federal or state payment-stablecoin regulator, FinCEN enforcement, and recurring examination findings.
- also
- GB Governing Body
- 3rd 3rd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.210(b)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAML-CFT-program risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to maintain risk-based internal controls — including documented ML/TF risk-assessment that incorporates the AML/CFT National Priorities and updates promptly on material change per § 1033.210(b) — fails one of the four 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h) pillars, exposes the PPSI to BSA civil-money penalty, and surfaces as recurring examination findings. Per § 1033.210(b) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.210(b)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAML-CFT-program risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to deliver ongoing AML/CFT training to all appropriate personnel per § 1033.210(b) — including front-office, transaction-monitoring, and lawful-order workflow staff — degrades the human-control layer of one of the four 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h) AML pillars, exposes the PPSI to BSA civil-money penalty, and is a recurring examination finding under primary federal or state payment-stablecoin regulator supervision. Per § 1033.210(b) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.240(a)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceProgrammable-enforcement risk: block · freeze · reject capability fails at one of three loci — (a) code-level (contract function missing or gated to the wrong principal), (b) operator-level (TMS or workflow fails to convert alerts into contract calls), or (c) protocol-level (chain validators miss the supervisory finality SLA). **Impact:** examination findings at each unevidenced mode and IEEPA civil-penalty exposure when the underlying transaction is sanctions-related. **Recommendation:** evidence all three modes — function-test report, detection-latency log, validator-set due-diligence memo. Per § 1033.240(a) and practitioner-source: OFAC · A Framework for OFAC Compliance Commitments (May 2019).
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.610; cross-references 31 CFR § 1010.610Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCustomer-due-diligence risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to apply § 1010.610 enhanced due-diligence requirements to correspondent accounts for foreign financial institutions per § 1033.610 — including ownership identification, nested-correspondent screening, and AML-program adequacy review — exposes the PPSI to USA PATRIOT Act § 312 enforcement and BSA civil-money penalty, and surfaces as a recurring examination finding under primary federal or state payment-stablecoin regulator supervision. Per § 1033.610 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR §§ 1033.310–1033.315; cross-references 31 CFR §§ 1010.310–1010.315Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAML-CFT-program risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to extend the CTR regime under §§ 1033.310–.315 to physical-currency intake channels — kiosk, retail, or other locations where 'transaction in currency' under § 1010.100(bbb)(2) actually fires — leaves a gap in the BSA reporting perimeter the rule extends to PPSIs. Late or missed CTR filings expose the PPSI to BSA civil-money penalty and recurring examination findings. Per §§ 1033.310–.315 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.630; cross-references 31 CFR § 1010.630Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCustomer-due-diligence risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to operate the § 1010.630 foreign-shell-bank prohibition per § 1033.630 — including ownership-records collection on foreign-bank correspondents and the agent-for-service-of-legal-process registry — admits a prohibited counterparty class onto the PPSI's books. A single shell-bank correspondent breach exposes the PPSI to BSA civil-money penalty and is a high-severity examination finding. Per § 1033.630 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.240(b)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceLawful-order compliance risk: technical inability to seize, freeze, burn, or prevent transfer of issued payment stablecoins under a court or Federal-agency order — per proposed 31 CFR § 1033.240(b) — exposes the PPSI to direct civil-penalty exposure, supervisory enforcement by the primary federal or state payment-stablecoin regulator, and reputational impairment in subsequent licensing reviews; execution-latency on lawful orders is a discrete examination finding.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.102(a) → 31 CFR §§ 501.603, 501.604Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceBlocked-property reporting-failure risk: late filing of the OFAC blocked-property or rejected-transaction report past the 10-business-day deadline at 31 CFR §§ 501.603 / 501.604 — invoked for PPSIs by proposed 31 CFR § 502.102(a) — is a discrete civil-penalty exposure under IEEPA, separate from the underlying sanctions violation; missing intake-to-filing timestamps or absent submission receipts compound the finding under primary-regulator examination.
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1010.100(t)(11)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceRegime-trigger risk: PPSI status under the BSA financial-institution definition at proposed 31 CFR § 1010.100(t)(11) is the gate that activates all downstream AML/CFT, SAR, CTR, Travel Rule, and recordkeeping obligations; mis-classification removes the entire program scaffolding and exposes the operator to BSA civil-money penalty and supervisory action by the primary federal or state payment-stablecoin regulator.
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.620; cross-references 31 CFR § 1010.620Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceCustomer-due-diligence risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to apply § 1010.620 enhanced due-diligence requirements to private banking accounts — including the senior-foreign-political-figure (PEP) overlay — per § 1033.620, leaves a known-elevated-risk customer segment under standard CDD only. Non-application exposes the PPSI to USA PATRIOT Act § 312 enforcement, BSA civil-money penalty, and recurring examination findings under primary federal or state payment-stablecoin regulator supervision. Per § 1033.620 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.410; cross-references 31 CFR § 1010.410(a)-(d)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAML-CFT-program risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance-records function to maintain § 1010.410(a)–(c) records on extensions of credit and cross-border transfers >$10,000 — or the five-year retention for § 1010.370(a) order-related records under § 1010.410(d) — breaks the BSA recordkeeping perimeter as applied to PPSIs via § 1033.410. Recordkeeping deficiencies expose the PPSI to BSA civil-money penalty and recurring examination findings. Per § 1033.410 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1010.410(e); PPSI added at § 1010.410(e)(6)(i)(K)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAML-CFT-program risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance-records function to collect and retain Recordkeeping Rule records for funds transfers and transmittals ≥$3,000 — PPSIs added to the financial-institution list at § 1010.410(e)(6)(i)(K) — leaves the originator/beneficiary intake gap that pairs with the Travel Rule under § 1010.410(f). Deficiencies expose the PPSI to BSA civil-money penalty and recurring examination findings. Per § 1010.410(e) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.320Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceReporting-failure risk: missed or late SAR filing on suspicious secondary-market payment-stablecoin activity under proposed 31 CFR § 1033.320 triggers BSA civil-money penalty exposure and is a high-frequency examination finding under primary federal or state payment-stablecoin regulator supervision. Inadequate SAR narratives, gaps in case-disposition records, or failure to maintain the five-year retention period compound the finding into supervisory enforcement.
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(a)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceSanctions-program risk: failure to maintain an effective sanctions compliance program tailored to PPSI size and complexity — five-element framework per proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(a)-(b), aligned to OFAC's 2019 Framework for OFAC Compliance Commitments — creates strict-liability exposure under IEEPA, supervisory enforcement by the primary federal or state payment-stablecoin regulator, and OFAC civil-penalty exposure; sanctions violations attach without regard to intent.
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(b)(3)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceSanctions-controls risk: failure to identify, or to block or reject, sanctioned payment-stablecoin activity (primary or secondary market) — screening coverage spans SDN List, 50 Percent Rule, and sectoral lists per proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(b)(3) — constitutes a strict-liability sanctions violation enforceable under IEEPA; the technical-capability obligation is contemporaneous with the screening obligation, not aspirational, and exposes the operator to overlapping OFAC and primary-regulator enforcement.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.102(a); cross-references 31 CFR Part 501, Subpart CTreasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceSCP program-deficiency risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance-records function to maintain the OFAC recordkeeping and reporting obligations at 31 CFR Part 501, Subpart C — invoked for PPSIs by § 502.102(a) — creates a discrete civil-penalty exposure separate from the underlying sanctions violation, and surfaces in OFAC examination as a recurring books-and-records finding. Per § 502.102(a) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(b)(2)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceSCP program-deficiency risk: failure of the 2LoD risk-assessment function to perform holistic U.S.-sanctions risk assessments at appropriate intervals — analyzing payment-stablecoin activity, customer base, size and complexity, foreign-person contact points, and product set per § 502.201(b)(2) — and to revise upon identified violations, new products, or material risk-profile changes, creates strict-liability IEEPA exposure and OFAC civil-penalty exposure. Per § 502.201(b)(2) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(b)(4)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceTesting-and-auditing risk: failure to maintain an independent 3LoD testing or audit function — accountable to senior management with sufficient resources, expertise, and authority to identify sanctions-compliance weaknesses per § 502.201(b)(4) — and to remediate identified gaps, forfeits the IIA 2020 independent-verification layer over the 2LoD SCP and creates strict-liability IEEPA exposure plus OFAC civil-penalty exposure. Per § 502.201(b)(4) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 3rd 3rd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(b)(5)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceSCP program-deficiency risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to provide periodic sanctions-compliance training to all appropriate personnel per § 502.201(b)(5) — including front-office, screening operations, and lawful-order workflow staff — degrades the human layer of the five-element SCP and creates strict-liability IEEPA exposure when an untrained employee processes a sanctioned transaction. Per § 502.201(b)(5) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1010.410(f); PPSI added at § 1010.410(e)(6)(i)(K)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceTravel-Rule transmission risk: payment-stablecoin transmittals of $3,000 or more without compliant originator and beneficiary information — IVMS 101 or compatible format per proposed 31 CFR § 1010.410(f) — breach the Recordkeeping and Travel Rule as applied to PPSIs, expose the operator to BSA civil-money penalty, and surface as FATF Recommendation 16 implementation gaps in mutual-evaluation reviews.
- also
- 1st 1st Line
3rd Line
Internal Audit — assures
-
31 C.F.R. § 1022.210 (MSBs); 31 C.F.R. § 1020.210 (banks); 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h)BSA / FinCEN in force by July 18, 2026AML/CFT program-deficiency risk: failure of the 2LoD compliance function to maintain a board-approved AML program meeting the four statutory pillars under 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h) — internal controls, designated AML compliance officer, ongoing training, and independent testing routed to the 3LoD layer — exposes the institution to BSA civil-money penalty, FinCEN enforcement, and recurring examination findings under primary federal supervisor review. Per 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FATF Recommendation 15 Interpretive Note ¶4FATF R.15 in force by July 18, 2026AML/CFT program-deficiency risk: a VASP that fails to extend the full FATF Recommendations 10–21 program suite to its virtual-asset activity through its 2LoD compliance function — customer due diligence, recordkeeping, suspicious-transaction reporting, internal controls, training, and independent testing routed to the 3LoD layer — under R.15 Interpretive Note ¶4 surfaces in its member-jurisdiction AML statute enforcement and contributes to mutual-evaluation findings for that jurisdiction. Per FATF R.15 IN ¶4 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.6(a)(2)FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceInternal-audit-coverage risk: failure to maintain a 3LoD internal-audit function or, where size does not warrant a full function, an equivalent system of independent reviews of key internal controls per § 350.6(a)(2), forfeits independent verification of the 2LoD risk-management framework. Findings surface as FDIC examination criticism and shift reliance toward supervisory rather than independent assurance. Evidence: independent-review engagement letter and board-acknowledged findings register. Per § 350.6(a)(2) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OFAC Sanctions Compliance Guidance for the Virtual Currency Industry (2021-10-15)OFAC Sanctions in force by July 18, 2026Virtual-currency-sanctions risk: failure to align the institution's sanctions-compliance program to the five-element framework expressed in OFAC's 2021 Sanctions Compliance Guidance for the Virtual Currency Industry — management commitment, risk assessment, internal controls, testing and audit, and training — surfaces examination findings, exposes blockchain-native counterparty processing to strict-liability IEEPA penalty under 50 U.S.C. § 1705, and conditions reputational impairment under OFAC enforcement-action publication. Per OFAC Virtual Currency Guidance (2021-10-15) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.210(b)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceInternal-audit-coverage risk: failure of the 3LoD internal-audit function — or an equivalent independent-review arrangement where size does not warrant a full function — to test the AML/CFT program for compliance and effectiveness per § 1033.210(b), forfeits the IIA 2020 independent-verification layer over the program. Findings surface as BSA examination criticism and BSA civil-money penalty exposure. Per § 1033.210(b) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 1033.210(a); implements 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h)(1)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAML/CFT program-deficiency risk: failure to maintain an effective program meeting 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h)(1) standards — covering internal controls, BSA officer designation, training, independent testing, customer due diligence, and AML/CFT National Priorities review — exposes the PPSI to BSA civil-money penalty, supervisory action by the primary federal or state payment-stablecoin regulator, FinCEN enforcement, and recurring examination findings.
- also
- GB Governing Body
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.201(b)(4)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceTesting-and-auditing risk: failure to maintain an independent 3LoD testing or audit function — accountable to senior management with sufficient resources, expertise, and authority to identify sanctions-compliance weaknesses per § 502.201(b)(4) — and to remediate identified gaps, forfeits the IIA 2020 independent-verification layer over the 2LoD SCP and creates strict-liability IEEPA exposure plus OFAC civil-penalty exposure. Per § 502.201(b)(4) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
External Assurance
Auditors, regulators, attestors
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), FR 18535; implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(B) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(B))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceSupervisory-coordination risk: an IDI-subsidiary PPSI that addresses the FDIC framework in isolation from the OCC's Part 15 NPRM and the joint Treasury/FinCEN/OFAC FR 2026-06963 rulemaking — implementing GENIUS Act § 4(a)(4)(B) coordination — surfaces conflicting interpretations across primary supervisors and BSA/sanctions overlays. **Impact:** divergent examination findings, duplicative remediation, and forced realignment by the lead supervisor. **Recommendation:** the 2nd Line compliance function maintains a single cross-framework control matrix reconciled to each rulemaking's operative paragraph; target a defined (CMMI level 3) capability maturity. Per FR 18535 and proposed 12 CFR Part 350.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
FDIC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06974, 91 FR 18534), proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(h); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(3) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(3))FDIC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAudited-financial-statement risk: missed PCAOB-registered examination of the previous month-end report, or absent CEO/CFO certification under § 350.4(h) — the External-Assurance attestation that operationalizes GENIUS Act § 4(a)(3) — forfeits the statutory attestation chain. **Impact:** false-certification exposure under 18 U.S.C. 1350(c), FDIC supervisory action, and audit-committee remediation order. **Recommendation:** locked-cadence monthly examination workflow with audit-committee sign-off ahead of FDIC submission; target an optimized (CMMI level 5) capability maturity for the certification process. Per proposed 12 CFR § 350.4(h).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
FSB High-Level Recommendation 1 (2023-07-17)FSB GSC in force by July 18, 2026Supervisory-coordination risk: a member jurisdiction whose authorities lack the powers, tools, and resources to comprehensively regulate, supervise, and oversee a GSC arrangement under FSB High-Level Recommendation 1 (2023-07-17) creates External-Assurance-layer gaps that downstream surface as regulatory-comparability findings for issuers operating cross-border, supervisory-coordination failures on enforcement matters, and FSB peer-review criticism in subsequent implementation progress reports. Per FSB GSC HLR 1 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
GENIUS Act §6(b); Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceAudited-financial-statement risk: a PPSI with more than $50B in outstanding payment stablecoins that fails to submit annual financial statements audited by a PCAOB-registered firm — the External-Assurance attestation required by GENIUS Act §6(b) and operationalized at proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(l) — forfeits the statutory threshold safeguard, exposes its primary federal or state payment-stablecoin regulator to coverage gaps, and conditions revocation exposure. Per GENIUS Act §6(b) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
GENIUS Act §11(b); Public Law 119-27GENIUS Act not yet in forceThird-party-risk-management risk: the 2LoD TPRM function's failure to verify that all custodians of PPSI reserve assets, stablecoins-as-collateral, and issuance private keys are subject to federal or state banking-regulator oversight per GENIUS Act §11(b) — and to evidence the External-Assurance regulator-coordination posture — exposes the PPSI to statutory violation, supervisory enforcement, and the reserve-shortfall escalation pathway when an ineligible custodian fails. Per GENIUS Act §11(b) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(l); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(10) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(10))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAudited-financial-statement risk: a PPSI with more than $50B consolidated total outstanding issuance value that fails to file a PCAOB-registered-firm-audited annual financial statement under § 15.14(l) within 120 days of fiscal year-end, or to publish it on the PPSI website, breaches GENIUS Act § 4(a)(10) and forfeits its External-Assurance attestation — exposing the PPSI to OCC supervisory action and revocation exposure under § 15.33. Per § 15.14(l) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.14(a)–(d); implements GENIUS Act § 6(a)(3) and § 6(a)(4)(C) (12 U.S.C. 5905(a)(3), 5905(a)(4)(C))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceExamination-readiness risk: PPSIs >$1B outstanding issuance value or >$25B trading volume face annual full-scope examination; failure to maintain books and records 'in English' (§ 15.14(f)) or to grant prompt and complete access to officers, directors, employees, agents, and records (§ 15.14(b)) is a discrete supervisory finding separate from the underlying substantive violations.
- also
- 2nd 2nd Line
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(f); implements GENIUS Act § 4(a)(3)(C) (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(3)(C))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceAudited-financial-statement risk: a registered public accounting firm examination missed past the noon-on-last-day deadline, or absent CEO/CFO certification under § 15.11(f) — the External-Assurance attestation operationalizing GENIUS Act § 4(a)(3)(C) — breaks the statutory attestation chain. **Impact:** false-certification exposure under 18 U.S.C. 1350(c) and OCC supervisory action separate from the underlying composition deficiency. **Recommendation:** locked-cadence monthly examination workflow with audit-committee sign-off ahead of OCC submission; target an optimized (CMMI level 5) capability maturity for the certification process. Per proposed 12 CFR § 15.11(f).
- also
- GB Governing Body
-
OCC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-04089, 91 FR 10202), proposed 12 CFR § 15.33; implements GENIUS Act § 5(i) (12 U.S.C. 5904(i))OCC PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceSupervisory-coordination risk: PPSI failure to file the § 15.14(k) annual certification — or an FPSI's loss of the comparability determination under § 15.32 — exposes the entity to revocation or rescission under § 15.33 with hearing rights under 12 CFR part 19, except in expeditious-action cases. The OCC consults the Treasury Secretary on FPSI rescissions, compounding the loss of External-Assurance regulatory recognition. Per § 15.33 and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
-
FinCEN/OFAC PPSI NPRM (FR 2026-06963), proposed 31 CFR § 502.102(b)Treasury PPSI NPRM (2026) not yet in forceSenior-management-commitment risk: PPSI inability to produce on OFAC request any GENIUS Act SCP-effectiveness certification submitted to the primary federal or state payment-stablecoin regulator under § 502.102(b) — surfaces a failure of the Governing-Body attestation chain and the External-Assurance regulator-coordination interface, and provides OFAC with a discrete IEEPA civil-penalty hook against the certifying executives. Per § 502.102(b) and practitioner-source: IIA · The Three Lines Model (July 2020).
- also
- GB Governing Body
Unattributed
No risk caption yet — accountability layer not asserted
These provisions carry no riskCaption yet, so
no Three Lines layer is asserted. This is an honesty marker, not an error — it is the
queue the next Governance backfill works from.
Vendor coverage
| Vendor | Provisions covered | Primary provisions |
|---|---|---|
BNY Mellon BNY Digital Cash (tokenized deposits) bny-d | 2 | — |
Chainalysis Chainalysis KYT chainalysis-kyt | 12 | ofac.sdn-screening , treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-risk-based-controls , treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.block-freeze-reject-capability |
Chainalysis Chainalysis Reactor chainalysis-reactor | 4 | — |
Circle Circle Agent Wallets circle-agent-wallets | 4 | — |
Circle Arc circle-arc | 1 | — |
Circle USDC circle-usdc | 17 | genius-act.issuance-prohibition , genius-act.monthly-reserve-disclosure , genius-act.permitted-issuer-classes , genius-act.redemption-disclosure , genius-act.reserves-1-to-1 , genius-act.reserves-permitted-assets , genius-act.reserves-rehypothecation-ban , genius-act.yield-prohibition , occ-nprm-2026.monthly-cfo-attestation , occ-nprm-2026.monthly-public-reserve-composition-report , occ-nprm-2026.permissible-reserve-asset-types , occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-rehypothecation , occ-nprm-2026.redemption-timely , treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.block-freeze-reject-capability , treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.ppsi-as-financial-institution |
Civic Civic Pass civic | 1 | — |
Coinbase Coinbase Agentic Wallets coinbase-agentic-wallets | 4 | — |
Coinbase (TRUST coalition) Travel Rule Universal Solution Technology (TRUST) coinbase-trust | 10 | bsa.travel-rule , fatf-r16.beneficiary-fi-obligations , fatf-r16.originator-fi-obligations , fatf-r16.virtual-asset-travel-rule-2019 , fatf-r16.wire-transfer-information , treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.travel-rule |
Elliptic Elliptic Lens elliptic-lens | 9 | ofac.sdn-screening , treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-risk-based-controls |
Fireblocks Fireblocks Policy Engine (Transaction Authorization Policy) fireblocks-policy-engine | 7 | ofac.sdn-screening , treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.block-freeze-reject-capability , treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-internal-controls |
JPMorgan JPM Coin (Kinexys) jpm-kinexys | 2 | — |
Consensys MetaMask Institutional metamask-institutional | 3 | — |
Notabene Transaction Authorization Protocol (TAP) notabene-tap | 11 | bsa.travel-rule , fatf-r16.beneficiary-fi-obligations , fatf-r16.originator-fi-obligations , fatf-r16.virtual-asset-travel-rule-2019 , fatf-r16.wire-transfer-information , treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.travel-rule |
Paxos USDP (Paxos USD) paxos-usdp | 14 | genius-act.monthly-reserve-disclosure , genius-act.permitted-issuer-classes , genius-act.redemption-disclosure , genius-act.reserves-1-to-1 , genius-act.reserves-permitted-assets , genius-act.reserves-rehypothecation-ban , genius-act.yield-prohibition , occ-nprm-2026.monthly-cfo-attestation , occ-nprm-2026.monthly-public-reserve-composition-report , occ-nprm-2026.permissible-reserve-asset-types , occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-rehypothecation , treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.block-freeze-reject-capability , treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.ppsi-as-financial-institution |
Persona Persona KYA persona-kya | 2 | — |
Privado ID Privado ID privado-id | 2 | — |
Ripple Labs · Standard Custody & Trust Company LLC Ripple USD (RLUSD) ripple-rlusd | 1 | — |
Skyfire KYAPay skyfire-kyapay | 3 | — |
Stripe (Bridge, acquired late 2024) Stripe Bridge / Bridge Open Issuance stripe-bridge | 1 | — |
Sumsub Sumsub Agent KYC sumsub-agent-kyc | 2 | — |
TRM Labs TRM Forensics trm-forensics | 4 | — |
TRM Labs TRM Transaction Monitoring trm-transaction-monitoring | 12 | ofac.sdn-screening , treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-risk-based-controls , treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.block-freeze-reject-capability |
Attestation-evidence coverage
| Evidence type | Provisions requiring |
|---|---|
| § 15.30(b)(1)(iii) certification of no material misrepresentations or omissions | 1 |
| $3,000 threshold aggregation-logic test report | 1 |
| 10-business-day filing SLA dashboard | 1 |
| 12 CFR part 328 misuse-of-FDIC-name-or-logo compliance attestation | 1 |
| AML/CFT National Priorities review memorandum | 1 |
| annual capital-adequacy assessment with business-model and operational-risk scenario analysis | 1 |
| annual SCP risk-assessment per § 502.201(b)(2) | 1 |
| average-tenor and geographic-location-of-custody calculation methodology documentation per § 350.4(g) | 1 |
| blocked and rejected transaction log | 1 |
| blocked-address registry change log | 1 |
| blocked-transaction case files with intake-to-filing timestamps | 1 |
| board- or board-committee-approved IT/security program document per § 15.13(b)(2) | 1 |
| board-approved affiliate / related-third-party policy with § 15.10(c)(4)(i) rebuttal procedures | 1 |
| board-approved AML/CFT program document | 1 |
| board-approved entity-class determination memo with § 15.1(b) and § 15.2 cross-references | 1 |
| board-approved IT/security framework per § 350.6(b) | 1 |
| board-approved SCP document per § 502.201(b)(1) | 1 |
| board-approved technical-capability attestation referencing § 1033.240(a) | 1 |
| Call Report classification documentation distinguishing § 350.1 deposits from § 350.1 payment stablecoins | 1 |
| case-disposition records with five-year retention | 1 |
| CEO/CFO certification per § 15.11(f)(2) (false certifications subject to 18 U.S.C. 1350(c) criminal penalties) | 1 |
| CEO/CFO certification per § 350.4(h)(2) (false certifications subject to 18 U.S.C. 1350(c) criminal penalties) | 1 |
| CET1 and AT1 instrument terms compliant with 12 CFR Part 3 substantive criteria (qualifying-equity attestation) | 1 |
| Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certification per § 15.11(f)(2) | 1 |
| Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer monthly certification per § 350.4(h)(2) | 1 |
| complete set of books and records in English per § 15.14(f) | 1 |
| court-order workflow runbook and authority matrix | 1 |
| custody agreement with eligible financial institution per § 350.1 and § 350.4(a)(3) | 1 |
| custody agreements titled to the PPSI or a qualified custodian acting as agent (no liens/encumbrances) | 1 |
| custody confirmation letters from reserve custodians | 1 |
| custody-agreement clauses prohibiting custodian rehypothecation per § 15.10(c)(5) and § 15.11(a)(1)(iv) | 1 |
| custody-agreement clauses prohibiting custodian, sub-custodian, and affiliate rehypothecation per § 350.3(b)(5) | 1 |
| customer disclosure framework explaining the deposit vs. stablecoin distinction | 1 |
| customer-facing terms-and-conditions disclosing 'no pass-through FDIC coverage to stablecoin holders' | 1 |
| customer-facing terms-and-conditions language confirming no margin or credit purchase of payment stablecoins | 1 |
| designated AML/CFT compliance officer appointment record | 1 |
| examination report by registered public accounting firm per § 350.4(h)(1) | 1 |
| examiner-access governance protocol per § 15.14(b) | 1 |
| FDIC notification template per § 350.4(i)(1) with sign-off chain | 1 |
| fingerprints and FBI national criminal history background check per § 15.30(b)(4) | 1 |
| front-end UI review for any 'FDIC-insured,' 'guaranteed,' or full-faith-and-credit-of-the-United-States messaging | 1 |
| front-end UI scan log for any 'FDIC-insured' or 'pass-through' phrasing relative to stablecoin holdings | 1 |
| GAAP-conformant reserve-asset record on PPSI balance sheet incorporated into parent IDI Call Report | 1 |
| geographic-custody-location attestation for each reserve category per § 15.11(e) | 1 |
| independent testing engagement letter and report | 1 |
| Interagency Biographical and Financial Report submissions for each director, executive officer, and principal shareholder | 1 |
| Interagency Biographical and Financial Report submissions per § 15.30(b)(1)(ii) | 1 |
| internal audit sampling of customer purchase transactions for credit-funded patterns | 1 |
| intra-day reserve monitoring system per § 350.4(a)(2) with end-of-day reconciliation | 1 |
| intra-day reserve-fair-value reconciliation system with reasonable-grounds-to-suspect escalation procedure | 1 |
| ITSO appointment record and qualifications memo per § 15.13(b)(2) | 1 |
| IVMS 101 message log sample (originator and beneficiary fields) | 1 |
| joint-statement-on-crypto-asset-safekeeping (July 14, 2025) alignment memo | 1 |
| key-management procedures for issuer-authority operations | 1 |
| lawful-order intake and execution log (with execution-latency timestamps) | 1 |
| marketing-and-disclosure review log identifying any 'rewards,' 'cash-back,' or 'staking' messaging | 1 |
| marketing-and-disclosure review log per § 350.3(b)(3) | 1 |
| marketing-and-disclosure review log per § 350.3(b)(3) with reasonable-person test documentation | 1 |
| marketing-and-disclosure scan log identifying 'rewards,' 'cash-back,' or 'staking' messaging | 1 |
| monthly attestation that repurchase proceeds were used solely to meet redemption requests | 2 |
| monthly per-brand composition report per § 350.4(g) table 1 published by close of business on the last day of each month | 1 |
| monthly reserve composition attestation (AICPA Digital Assets practice aid) | 1 |
| monthly reserve-composition report (§ 15.11(e) table 1 format) published to PPSI website by noon on the last day of each month | 1 |
| monthly reserve-composition report per § 15.11(e) with end-of-day fair-value reconciliation | 1 |
| OCC application package per § 15.30(b)(1)(i) with form availability at www.occ.gov | 1 |
| OCC capital-amount-setting letter (cf. OCC Bulletin 2007-21 trust-bank precedent) | 1 |
| OFAC 2019 'A Framework for OFAC Compliance Commitments' alignment memo | 1 |
| OFAC blocked-property quarterly aggregate report | 1 |
| OFAC Reporting System (TRS) submission receipts | 1 |
| OFAC SDN list ingestion and screening latency log | 1 |
| OFAC Virtual Currency Industry Guidance (2021) alignment memo | 1 |
| parent IDI safety-and-soundness self-assessment incorporating subsidiary PPSI yield-program review | 1 |
| parent-IDI capital-and-liquidity coordination memo per § 350.6(a)(7) | 1 |
| parent-IDI-to-subsidiary credit-line review documenting absence of pass-through customer credit | 1 |
| Part 330 account-category determination for each tokenized deposit product | 1 |
| Part 330 corporate-deposit account-titling documentation for each reserve deposit account at an IDI | 1 |
| Part 330 pass-through-NO disclosure incorporated into customer-onboarding flow | 1 |
| private-key management procedures with backup/recovery testing logs | 1 |
| private-key management, backup, and recovery procedures per § 15.13(b)(5); joint-statement-on-crypto-asset-safekeeping (July 14, 2025) alignment memo | 1 |
| publication-time audit log with timestamp evidence | 1 |
| quarterly Call-Report-equivalent submissions per § 15.14(i) within 30 days of quarter-end | 1 |
| quarterly capital-position report submitted to the OCC under § 15.14(i) | 1 |
| rebuttal package per § 350.3(b)(4) for any flagged arrangement (contract, economic-substance memo, FDIC engagement record) | 1 |
| rebuttal submission package for any flagged arrangement (contract, economic-substance memo, OCC engagement record) | 1 |
| redemption-policy disclosure per § 15.12 referenced in § 15.30(c) | 1 |
| registered-public-accounting-firm examination report per § 15.11(f)(1) (cf. GENIUS Act § 4(a)(3)(C)) | 1 |
| remediation log for identified gaps per § 502.201(b)(3)(iii)(A) | 1 |
| repo-counterparty creditworthiness file with OCC pre-approval evidence (where applicable) per § 15.10(c)(5)(iii) | 1 |
| repurchase-agreement clearing-status log (SEC-registered clearing agency or prior FDIC written approval) | 1 |
| restoration-plan-trigger thresholds and pre-arranged funding sources per § 350.4(j) | 1 |
| SAR filing log with FinCEN BSA E-Filing System confirmations | 1 |
| SAR-narrative quality review samples | 1 |
| screening-engine coverage report (SDN List + 50 Percent Rule + sectoral lists) | 1 |
| secondary-market freeze-execution test report (smart-contract function coverage) | 1 |
| secondary-market transaction-monitoring rule inventory | 1 |
| smart-contract independent testing and validation report per § 15.13(b)(3)(iii)–(iv) | 1 |
| smart-contract seize / freeze / burn function test report | 1 |
| smart-contract validation and independent testing report | 1 |
| subsidiary chart and control-relationship attestation per § 15.2 'affiliate' definition | 1 |
| subsidiary-PPSI credit-policy attestation prohibiting customer credit extension for stablecoin purchase | 1 |
| tokenized-deposit-vs-payment-stablecoin classification memo per § 350.1 'deposit' and 'payment stablecoin' definitions | 1 |
| Travel Rule network transmission records (Notabene TAP, Sumsub Travel Rule, TRUST, Shyft, or comparable) | 1 |
| Treasury maturity ladder showing all positions ≤93 days | 1 |
| Treasury-bill remaining-maturity log demonstrating ≤93 days at sale per repo | 2 |
| tri-party repo collateral attestations | 1 |
| unhosted-wallet transmittal policy | 1 |
| weekly confidential blockchain-level reporting submission per § 15.14(h) | 1 |
| white-label / partnership-agreement inventory with affiliate and related-third-party identification | 1 |
| white-label and partnership-agreement inventory with interest/yield-flow analysis | 1 |
| written internal-controls policies per § 502.201(b)(3)(ii) | 1 |
Diagnostics
Diagnostics are not errors; they are honesty markers showing where the registry is thin and what we are owed back from the next backfill pass.
No attestation evidence 190
-
bsa.314a-314b-information-sharingProvision bsa.314a-314b-information-sharing has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
bsa.aml-programProvision bsa.aml-program has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
bsa.cipProvision bsa.cip has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
bsa.ctrProvision bsa.ctr has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
bsa.edd-correspondentProvision bsa.edd-correspondent has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
bsa.fincen-2013-cvc-guidanceProvision bsa.fincen-2013-cvc-guidance has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
bsa.msb-registrationProvision bsa.msb-registration has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
bsa.sarProvision bsa.sar has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
bsa.travel-ruleProvision bsa.travel-rule has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
cftc.dco-registrationProvision cftc.dco-registration has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
cftc.digital-assets-pilot-2025Provision cftc.digital-assets-pilot-2025 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
cftc.digital-commodity-classificationProvision cftc.digital-commodity-classification has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
cftc.fcm-registrationProvision cftc.fcm-registration has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
cftc.retail-commodity-transactionsProvision cftc.retail-commodity-transactions has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
cftc.spot-anti-fraudProvision cftc.spot-anti-fraud has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
cftc.swap-dealer-registrationProvision cftc.swap-dealer-registration has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r15.aml-cft-programProvision fatf-r15.aml-cft-program has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r15.cdd-r10-extensionProvision fatf-r15.cdd-r10-extension has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r15.cross-border-cooperationProvision fatf-r15.cross-border-cooperation has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r15.defi-scope-2021Provision fatf-r15.defi-scope-2021 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r15.licensing-registrationProvision fatf-r15.licensing-registration has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r15.proliferation-financing-r7Provision fatf-r15.proliferation-financing-r7 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r15.recordkeeping-r11Provision fatf-r15.recordkeeping-r11 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r15.stablecoin-treatmentProvision fatf-r15.stablecoin-treatment has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r15.str-r20Provision fatf-r15.str-r20 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r15.unhosted-wallet-treatment-2021Provision fatf-r15.unhosted-wallet-treatment-2021 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r15.vasp-definitionProvision fatf-r15.vasp-definition has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r16.beneficiary-fi-obligationsProvision fatf-r16.beneficiary-fi-obligations has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r16.beneficiary-side-obligations-2025Provision fatf-r16.beneficiary-side-obligations-2025 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r16.confirmation-of-payee-2025Provision fatf-r16.confirmation-of-payee-2025 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r16.cross-border-thresholdProvision fatf-r16.cross-border-threshold has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r16.fraud-prevention-expansion-2025Provision fatf-r16.fraud-prevention-expansion-2025 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r16.iso-20022-integration-2025Provision fatf-r16.iso-20022-integration-2025 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r16.originator-fi-obligationsProvision fatf-r16.originator-fi-obligations has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r16.proliferation-financing-expansion-2025Provision fatf-r16.proliferation-financing-expansion-2025 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r16.unhosted-wallet-treatment-2021Provision fatf-r16.unhosted-wallet-treatment-2021 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r16.virtual-asset-travel-rule-2019Provision fatf-r16.virtual-asset-travel-rule-2019 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fatf-r16.wire-transfer-informationProvision fatf-r16.wire-transfer-information has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.bsa-sanctions-complianceProvision fdic-nprm-2026.bsa-sanctions-compliance has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.coordination-occ-frb-stateProvision fdic-nprm-2026.coordination-occ-frb-state has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.definition-eligible-financial-institutionProvision fdic-nprm-2026.definition-eligible-financial-institution has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.definition-outstanding-issuance-valueProvision fdic-nprm-2026.definition-outstanding-issuance-value has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.definition-significant-redemption-requestProvision fdic-nprm-2026.definition-significant-redemption-request has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.definition-tokenized-depositProvision fdic-nprm-2026.definition-tokenized-deposit has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.identifiable-reserves-by-brandProvision fdic-nprm-2026.identifiable-reserves-by-brand has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.monthly-cfo-attestation-and-pcaob-examProvision fdic-nprm-2026.monthly-cfo-attestation-and-pcaob-exam has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.permissible-reserve-asset-typesProvision fdic-nprm-2026.permissible-reserve-asset-types has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.permitted-core-activitiesProvision fdic-nprm-2026.permitted-core-activities has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.permitted-supporting-activitiesProvision fdic-nprm-2026.permitted-supporting-activities has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-deceptive-nameProvision fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-deceptive-name has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-evasionProvision fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-evasion has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-legal-tenderProvision fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-legal-tender has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-unlawful-marketingProvision fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-unlawful-marketing has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.quarterly-call-reportProvision fdic-nprm-2026.quarterly-call-report has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-disclosures-and-feesProvision fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-disclosures-and-fees has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-policy-disclosureProvision fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-policy-disclosure has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-timely-two-business-daysProvision fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-timely-two-business-days has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-fair-valueProvision fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-fair-value has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-monetization-capabilityProvision fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-monetization-capability has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-diversification-40pct-capProvision fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-diversification-40pct-cap has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.restoration-planProvision fdic-nprm-2026.restoration-plan has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-asset-growthProvision fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-asset-growth has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-insider-affiliate-transactionsProvision fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-insider-affiliate-transactions has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-interest-rateProvision fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-interest-rate has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-internal-auditProvision fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-internal-audit has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-internal-controlsProvision fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-internal-controls has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-liquidityProvision fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-liquidity has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-third-party-service-providersProvision fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-third-party-service-providers has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.scope-fdic-supervised-ppsisProvision fdic-nprm-2026.scope-fdic-supervised-ppsis has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.severabilityProvision fdic-nprm-2026.severability has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.significant-redemption-requestProvision fdic-nprm-2026.significant-redemption-request has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fdic-nprm-2026.subpart-b-fdic-supervised-custodiansProvision fdic-nprm-2026.subpart-b-fdic-supervised-custodians has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fsb-gsc.rec-1-regulatory-powersProvision fsb-gsc.rec-1-regulatory-powers has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fsb-gsc.rec-10-payment-use-conditionsProvision fsb-gsc.rec-10-payment-use-conditions has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fsb-gsc.rec-2-comprehensive-regulationProvision fsb-gsc.rec-2-comprehensive-regulation has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fsb-gsc.rec-3-cross-border-cooperationProvision fsb-gsc.rec-3-cross-border-cooperation has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fsb-gsc.rec-4-governanceProvision fsb-gsc.rec-4-governance has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fsb-gsc.rec-5-risk-managementProvision fsb-gsc.rec-5-risk-management has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fsb-gsc.rec-6-data-accessProvision fsb-gsc.rec-6-data-access has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fsb-gsc.rec-7-recovery-resolutionProvision fsb-gsc.rec-7-recovery-resolution has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fsb-gsc.rec-8-disclosuresProvision fsb-gsc.rec-8-disclosures has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
fsb-gsc.rec-9-redemption-stabilisation-prudentialProvision fsb-gsc.rec-9-redemption-stabilisation-prudential has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
genius-act.annual-audit-50bProvision genius-act.annual-audit-50b has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
genius-act.bankruptcy-reserves-excludedProvision genius-act.bankruptcy-reserves-excluded has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
genius-act.custody-bank-regulator-onlyProvision genius-act.custody-bank-regulator-only has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
genius-act.daps-3yr-unauthorized-stablecoin-banProvision genius-act.daps-3yr-unauthorized-stablecoin-ban has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
genius-act.issuance-prohibitionProvision genius-act.issuance-prohibition has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
genius-act.monthly-reserve-disclosureProvision genius-act.monthly-reserve-disclosure has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
genius-act.permitted-issuer-classesProvision genius-act.permitted-issuer-classes has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
genius-act.redemption-disclosureProvision genius-act.redemption-disclosure has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
genius-act.reserves-1-to-1Provision genius-act.reserves-1-to-1 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
genius-act.reserves-rehypothecation-banProvision genius-act.reserves-rehypothecation-ban has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
genius-act.security-commodity-exclusionProvision genius-act.security-commodity-exclusion has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
genius-act.treasury-bsa-aml-coordinationProvision genius-act.treasury-bsa-aml-coordination has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
genius-act.yield-prohibitionProvision genius-act.yield-prohibition has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
irs-1099-da.basis-reportingProvision irs-1099-da.basis-reporting has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
irs-1099-da.broker-definitionProvision irs-1099-da.broker-definition has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
irs-1099-da.customer-statementsProvision irs-1099-da.customer-statements has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
irs-1099-da.good-faith-relief-2025Provision irs-1099-da.good-faith-relief-2025 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
irs-1099-da.gross-proceeds-reportingProvision irs-1099-da.gross-proceeds-reporting has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
irs-1099-da.transfer-statementsProvision irs-1099-da.transfer-statements has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.annual-audited-financial-statementProvision occ-nprm-2026.annual-audited-financial-statement has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.change-in-controlProvision occ-nprm-2026.change-in-control has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.custodial-property-protectionProvision occ-nprm-2026.custodial-property-protection has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.de-novo-capital-floorProvision occ-nprm-2026.de-novo-capital-floor has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.definition-eligible-financial-institutionProvision occ-nprm-2026.definition-eligible-financial-institution has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.definition-federal-qualified-ppsiProvision occ-nprm-2026.definition-federal-qualified-ppsi has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.definition-outstanding-issuance-valueProvision occ-nprm-2026.definition-outstanding-issuance-value has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.definition-state-qualified-ppsiProvision occ-nprm-2026.definition-state-qualified-ppsi has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.evasion-prohibitionProvision occ-nprm-2026.evasion-prohibition has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.large-issuer-insured-deposit-floorProvision occ-nprm-2026.large-issuer-insured-deposit-floor has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.monthly-cfo-attestationProvision occ-nprm-2026.monthly-cfo-attestation has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.omnibus-accounts-permittedProvision occ-nprm-2026.omnibus-accounts-permitted has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.permissible-reserve-asset-typesProvision occ-nprm-2026.permissible-reserve-asset-types has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.permitted-activitiesProvision occ-nprm-2026.permitted-activities has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-deceptive-nameProvision occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-deceptive-name has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-insuranceProvision occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-insurance has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-legal-tenderProvision occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-legal-tender has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.quarterly-call-reportProvision occ-nprm-2026.quarterly-call-report has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.redemption-policy-disclosureProvision occ-nprm-2026.redemption-policy-disclosure has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.redemption-timelyProvision occ-nprm-2026.redemption-timely has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-monetization-capabilityProvision occ-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-monetization-capability has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-withdrawal-after-attestationProvision occ-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-withdrawal-after-attestation has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.reserve-diversification-concentrationProvision occ-nprm-2026.reserve-diversification-concentration has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.reserve-shortfall-consequencesProvision occ-nprm-2026.reserve-shortfall-consequences has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.revocation-rescissionProvision occ-nprm-2026.revocation-rescission has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-interest-rateProvision occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-interest-rate has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-internal-controlsProvision occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-internal-controls has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.self-custody-hardware-software-exclusionProvision occ-nprm-2026.self-custody-hardware-software-exclusion has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.severabilityProvision occ-nprm-2026.severability has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.third-party-service-provider-governanceProvision occ-nprm-2026.third-party-service-provider-governance has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
occ-nprm-2026.weekly-blockchain-reportingProvision occ-nprm-2026.weekly-blockchain-reporting has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
ofac.50-percent-ruleProvision ofac.50-percent-rule has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
ofac.blocked-property-reportingProvision ofac.blocked-property-reporting has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
ofac.civil-penaltyProvision ofac.civil-penalty has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
ofac.iran-programProvision ofac.iran-program has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
ofac.north-korea-programProvision ofac.north-korea-program has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
ofac.russia-programProvision ofac.russia-program has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
ofac.sdn-screeningProvision ofac.sdn-screening has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
ofac.ssi-sectoralProvision ofac.ssi-sectoral has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
ofac.virtual-currency-guidance-2021Provision ofac.virtual-currency-guidance-2021 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
reg-e.coverageProvision reg-e.coverage has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
reg-e.error-resolutionProvision reg-e.error-resolution has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
reg-e.initial-disclosureProvision reg-e.initial-disclosure has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
reg-e.periodic-statementsProvision reg-e.periodic-statements has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
reg-e.preauthorized-eftsProvision reg-e.preauthorized-efts has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
reg-e.unauthorized-liabilityProvision reg-e.unauthorized-liability has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
sec.advisers-custody-ruleProvision sec.advisers-custody-rule has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
sec.broker-dealer-registrationProvision sec.broker-dealer-registration has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
sec.howey-classificationProvision sec.howey-classification has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
sec.regulation-atsProvision sec.regulation-ats has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
sec.rule-15c3-3-custodyProvision sec.rule-15c3-3-custody has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
sec.sab-122Provision sec.sab-122 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
sec.t-plus-1-settlementProvision sec.t-plus-1-settlement has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
sec.tokenized-securities-guidance-2025Provision sec.tokenized-securities-guidance-2025 has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.314a-information-sharingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.314a-information-sharing has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.314b-voluntary-sharingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.314b-voluntary-sharing has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-customer-due-diligenceProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-customer-due-diligence has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-independent-testingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-independent-testing has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-maintainProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-maintain has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-officerProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-officer has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-risk-based-controlsProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-risk-based-controls has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-trainingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-training has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.civil-money-penaltyProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.civil-money-penalty has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.correspondent-eddProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.correspondent-edd has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.ctr-filingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.ctr-filing has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.digital-asset-definedProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.digital-asset-defined has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.doj-referralProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.doj-referral has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.foreign-shell-bank-prohibitionProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.foreign-shell-bank-prohibition has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.lawful-order-definedProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.lawful-order-defined has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.part-1033-definitionsProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.part-1033-definitions has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.ppsi-as-financial-institutionProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.ppsi-as-financial-institution has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.private-banking-eddProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.private-banking-edd has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.recordkeepingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.recordkeeping has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.recordkeeping-funds-transfersProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.recordkeeping-funds-transfers has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-certification-productionProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-certification-production has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-recordkeeping-reportingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-recordkeeping-reporting has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-risk-assessmentProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-risk-assessment has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-senior-management-commitmentProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-senior-management-commitment has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-testing-auditingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-testing-auditing has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-trainingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-training has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.supervision-and-enforcementProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.supervision-and-enforcement has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.transaction-includes-stablecoinProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.transaction-includes-stablecoin has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
mtl.customer-disclosureProvision mtl.customer-disclosure has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
mtl.examination-cycleProvision mtl.examination-cycle has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
mtl.licensing-requirementProvision mtl.licensing-requirement has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
mtl.net-worth-requirementProvision mtl.net-worth-requirement has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
mtl.nmls-registrationProvision mtl.nmls-registration has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
mtl.permissible-investmentsProvision mtl.permissible-investments has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required. -
mtl.surety-bondProvision mtl.surety-bond has no attestationEvidence — content team backfill required.
No vendor candidates 172
-
bsa.314a-314b-information-sharingNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for bsa-fincen/bsa.314a-314b-information-sharing. -
bsa.ctrNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for bsa-fincen/bsa.ctr. -
bsa.edd-correspondentNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for bsa-fincen/bsa.edd-correspondent. -
bsa.fincen-2013-cvc-guidanceNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for bsa-fincen/bsa.fincen-2013-cvc-guidance. -
bsa.msb-registrationNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for bsa-fincen/bsa.msb-registration. -
cftc.dco-registrationNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for cftc/cftc.dco-registration. -
cftc.digital-assets-pilot-2025No vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for cftc/cftc.digital-assets-pilot-2025. -
cftc.digital-commodity-classificationNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for cftc/cftc.digital-commodity-classification. -
cftc.fcm-registrationNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for cftc/cftc.fcm-registration. -
cftc.retail-commodity-transactionsNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for cftc/cftc.retail-commodity-transactions. -
cftc.spot-anti-fraudNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for cftc/cftc.spot-anti-fraud. -
cftc.swap-dealer-registrationNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for cftc/cftc.swap-dealer-registration. -
fatf-r15.cross-border-cooperationNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fatf-r15/fatf-r15.cross-border-cooperation. -
fatf-r15.defi-scope-2021No vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fatf-r15/fatf-r15.defi-scope-2021. -
fatf-r15.licensing-registrationNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fatf-r15/fatf-r15.licensing-registration. -
fatf-r15.proliferation-financing-r7No vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fatf-r15/fatf-r15.proliferation-financing-r7. -
fatf-r15.recordkeeping-r11No vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fatf-r15/fatf-r15.recordkeeping-r11. -
fatf-r15.stablecoin-treatmentNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fatf-r15/fatf-r15.stablecoin-treatment. -
fatf-r15.unhosted-wallet-treatment-2021No vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fatf-r15/fatf-r15.unhosted-wallet-treatment-2021. -
fatf-r15.vasp-definitionNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fatf-r15/fatf-r15.vasp-definition. -
fatf-r16.cross-border-thresholdNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fatf-r16/fatf-r16.cross-border-threshold. -
fatf-r16.fraud-prevention-expansion-2025No vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fatf-r16/fatf-r16.fraud-prevention-expansion-2025. -
fatf-r16.iso-20022-integration-2025No vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fatf-r16/fatf-r16.iso-20022-integration-2025. -
fatf-r16.proliferation-financing-expansion-2025No vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fatf-r16/fatf-r16.proliferation-financing-expansion-2025. -
fdic-nprm-2026.bsa-sanctions-complianceNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.bsa-sanctions-compliance. -
fdic-nprm-2026.coordination-occ-frb-stateNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.coordination-occ-frb-state. -
fdic-nprm-2026.definition-eligible-financial-institutionNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.definition-eligible-financial-institution. -
fdic-nprm-2026.definition-outstanding-issuance-valueNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.definition-outstanding-issuance-value. -
fdic-nprm-2026.definition-significant-redemption-requestNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.definition-significant-redemption-request. -
fdic-nprm-2026.identifiable-reserves-by-brandNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.identifiable-reserves-by-brand. -
fdic-nprm-2026.monthly-cfo-attestation-and-pcaob-examNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.monthly-cfo-attestation-and-pcaob-exam. -
fdic-nprm-2026.monthly-reserve-composition-reportNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.monthly-reserve-composition-report. -
fdic-nprm-2026.part-330-tokenized-depositsNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.part-330-tokenized-deposits. -
fdic-nprm-2026.permissible-reserve-asset-typesNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.permissible-reserve-asset-types. -
fdic-nprm-2026.permitted-core-activitiesNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.permitted-core-activities. -
fdic-nprm-2026.permitted-supporting-activitiesNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.permitted-supporting-activities. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-credit-to-customersNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-credit-to-customers. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-deceptive-nameNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-deceptive-name. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-evasionNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-evasion. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-interest-yieldNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-interest-yield. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-insuranceNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-insurance. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-legal-tenderNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-legal-tender. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-rehypothecationNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-rehypothecation. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-unlawful-marketingNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-unlawful-marketing. -
fdic-nprm-2026.quarterly-call-reportNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.quarterly-call-report. -
fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-disclosures-and-feesNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-disclosures-and-fees. -
fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-policy-disclosureNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-policy-disclosure. -
fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-timely-two-business-daysNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-timely-two-business-days. -
fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-1to1-and-custodyNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-1to1-and-custody. -
fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-fair-valueNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-fair-value. -
fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-monetization-capabilityNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-monetization-capability. -
fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-diversification-40pct-capNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-diversification-40pct-cap. -
fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-shortfall-fdic-discretionary-toolsNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-shortfall-fdic-discretionary-tools. -
fdic-nprm-2026.restoration-planNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.restoration-plan. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-asset-growthNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-asset-growth. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-insider-affiliate-transactionsNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-insider-affiliate-transactions. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-interest-rateNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-interest-rate. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-internal-auditNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-internal-audit. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-it-securityNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-it-security. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-liquidityNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-liquidity. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-third-party-service-providersNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-third-party-service-providers. -
fdic-nprm-2026.scope-fdic-supervised-ppsisNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.scope-fdic-supervised-ppsis. -
fdic-nprm-2026.severabilityNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.severability. -
fdic-nprm-2026.significant-redemption-requestNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.significant-redemption-request. -
fdic-nprm-2026.subpart-b-fdic-supervised-custodiansNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fdic-nprm-2026/fdic-nprm-2026.subpart-b-fdic-supervised-custodians. -
fsb-gsc.rec-1-regulatory-powersNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fsb-gsc/fsb-gsc.rec-1-regulatory-powers. -
fsb-gsc.rec-10-payment-use-conditionsNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fsb-gsc/fsb-gsc.rec-10-payment-use-conditions. -
fsb-gsc.rec-2-comprehensive-regulationNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fsb-gsc/fsb-gsc.rec-2-comprehensive-regulation. -
fsb-gsc.rec-3-cross-border-cooperationNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fsb-gsc/fsb-gsc.rec-3-cross-border-cooperation. -
fsb-gsc.rec-4-governanceNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fsb-gsc/fsb-gsc.rec-4-governance. -
fsb-gsc.rec-5-risk-managementNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fsb-gsc/fsb-gsc.rec-5-risk-management. -
fsb-gsc.rec-6-data-accessNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fsb-gsc/fsb-gsc.rec-6-data-access. -
fsb-gsc.rec-7-recovery-resolutionNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fsb-gsc/fsb-gsc.rec-7-recovery-resolution. -
fsb-gsc.rec-8-disclosuresNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fsb-gsc/fsb-gsc.rec-8-disclosures. -
fsb-gsc.rec-9-redemption-stabilisation-prudentialNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for fsb-gsc/fsb-gsc.rec-9-redemption-stabilisation-prudential. -
genius-act.annual-audit-50bNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for genius-act/genius-act.annual-audit-50b. -
genius-act.custody-bank-regulator-onlyNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for genius-act/genius-act.custody-bank-regulator-only. -
genius-act.daps-3yr-unauthorized-stablecoin-banNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for genius-act/genius-act.daps-3yr-unauthorized-stablecoin-ban. -
genius-act.security-commodity-exclusionNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for genius-act/genius-act.security-commodity-exclusion. -
genius-act.treasury-bsa-aml-coordinationNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for genius-act/genius-act.treasury-bsa-aml-coordination. -
irs-1099-da.basis-reportingNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for irs-1099-da/irs-1099-da.basis-reporting. -
irs-1099-da.broker-definitionNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for irs-1099-da/irs-1099-da.broker-definition. -
irs-1099-da.customer-statementsNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for irs-1099-da/irs-1099-da.customer-statements. -
irs-1099-da.good-faith-relief-2025No vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for irs-1099-da/irs-1099-da.good-faith-relief-2025. -
irs-1099-da.gross-proceeds-reportingNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for irs-1099-da/irs-1099-da.gross-proceeds-reporting. -
irs-1099-da.transfer-statementsNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for irs-1099-da/irs-1099-da.transfer-statements. -
occ-nprm-2026.annual-audited-financial-statementNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.annual-audited-financial-statement. -
occ-nprm-2026.change-in-controlNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.change-in-control. -
occ-nprm-2026.custodial-property-protectionNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.custodial-property-protection. -
occ-nprm-2026.de-novo-capital-floorNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.de-novo-capital-floor. -
occ-nprm-2026.definition-eligible-financial-institutionNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.definition-eligible-financial-institution. -
occ-nprm-2026.definition-federal-qualified-ppsiNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.definition-federal-qualified-ppsi. -
occ-nprm-2026.definition-outstanding-issuance-valueNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.definition-outstanding-issuance-value. -
occ-nprm-2026.definition-state-qualified-ppsiNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.definition-state-qualified-ppsi. -
occ-nprm-2026.evasion-prohibitionNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.evasion-prohibition. -
occ-nprm-2026.examination-cadenceNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.examination-cadence. -
occ-nprm-2026.large-issuer-insured-deposit-floorNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.large-issuer-insured-deposit-floor. -
occ-nprm-2026.omnibus-accounts-permittedNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.omnibus-accounts-permitted. -
occ-nprm-2026.ongoing-capital-requirementNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.ongoing-capital-requirement. -
occ-nprm-2026.permitted-activitiesNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.permitted-activities. -
occ-nprm-2026.ppsi-application-approvalNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.ppsi-application-approval. -
occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-deceptive-nameNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-deceptive-name. -
occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-interest-yieldNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-interest-yield. -
occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-insuranceNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-insurance. -
occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-legal-tenderNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-legal-tender. -
occ-nprm-2026.quarterly-call-reportNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.quarterly-call-report. -
occ-nprm-2026.redemption-policy-disclosureNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.redemption-policy-disclosure. -
occ-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-monetization-capabilityNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-monetization-capability. -
occ-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-withdrawal-after-attestationNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-withdrawal-after-attestation. -
occ-nprm-2026.reserve-diversification-concentrationNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.reserve-diversification-concentration. -
occ-nprm-2026.reserve-shortfall-consequencesNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.reserve-shortfall-consequences. -
occ-nprm-2026.revocation-rescissionNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.revocation-rescission. -
occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-information-tech-securityNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-information-tech-security. -
occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-interest-rateNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-interest-rate. -
occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-internal-controlsNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-internal-controls. -
occ-nprm-2026.scope-six-entity-typesNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.scope-six-entity-types. -
occ-nprm-2026.self-custody-hardware-software-exclusionNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.self-custody-hardware-software-exclusion. -
occ-nprm-2026.severabilityNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.severability. -
occ-nprm-2026.third-party-service-provider-governanceNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for occ-nprm-2026/occ-nprm-2026.third-party-service-provider-governance. -
ofac.50-percent-ruleNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for ofac/ofac.50-percent-rule. -
ofac.civil-penaltyNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for ofac/ofac.civil-penalty. -
ofac.iran-programNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for ofac/ofac.iran-program. -
ofac.north-korea-programNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for ofac/ofac.north-korea-program. -
ofac.russia-programNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for ofac/ofac.russia-program. -
ofac.ssi-sectoralNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for ofac/ofac.ssi-sectoral. -
ofac.virtual-currency-guidance-2021No vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for ofac/ofac.virtual-currency-guidance-2021. -
reg-e.coverageNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for reg-e/reg-e.coverage. -
reg-e.error-resolutionNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for reg-e/reg-e.error-resolution. -
reg-e.initial-disclosureNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for reg-e/reg-e.initial-disclosure. -
reg-e.periodic-statementsNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for reg-e/reg-e.periodic-statements. -
reg-e.preauthorized-eftsNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for reg-e/reg-e.preauthorized-efts. -
reg-e.unauthorized-liabilityNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for reg-e/reg-e.unauthorized-liability. -
sec.advisers-custody-ruleNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for sec/sec.advisers-custody-rule. -
sec.broker-dealer-registrationNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for sec/sec.broker-dealer-registration. -
sec.howey-classificationNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for sec/sec.howey-classification. -
sec.regulation-atsNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for sec/sec.regulation-ats. -
sec.rule-15c3-3-custodyNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for sec/sec.rule-15c3-3-custody. -
sec.sab-122No vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for sec/sec.sab-122. -
sec.t-plus-1-settlementNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for sec/sec.t-plus-1-settlement. -
sec.tokenized-securities-guidance-2025No vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for sec/sec.tokenized-securities-guidance-2025. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.314a-information-sharingNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.314a-information-sharing. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.314b-voluntary-sharingNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.314b-voluntary-sharing. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-independent-testingNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-independent-testing. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-maintainNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-maintain. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-officerNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-officer. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-program-generalNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-program-general. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-trainingNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-training. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.civil-money-penaltyNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.civil-money-penalty. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.correspondent-eddNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.correspondent-edd. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.ctr-filingNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.ctr-filing. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.digital-asset-definedNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.digital-asset-defined. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.foreign-shell-bank-prohibitionNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.foreign-shell-bank-prohibition. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.lawful-order-complianceNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.lawful-order-compliance. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.lawful-order-definedNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.lawful-order-defined. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.part-1033-definitionsNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.part-1033-definitions. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.private-banking-eddNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.private-banking-edd. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-certification-productionNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-certification-production. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-general-requirementNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-general-requirement. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-recordkeeping-reportingNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-recordkeeping-reporting. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-risk-assessmentNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-risk-assessment. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-senior-management-commitmentNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-senior-management-commitment. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-testing-auditingNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-testing-auditing. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-trainingNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-training. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.supervision-and-enforcementNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.supervision-and-enforcement. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.transaction-includes-stablecoinNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026/treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.transaction-includes-stablecoin. -
mtl.customer-disclosureNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for us-state-mtl-baseline/mtl.customer-disclosure. -
mtl.examination-cycleNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for us-state-mtl-baseline/mtl.examination-cycle. -
mtl.licensing-requirementNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for us-state-mtl-baseline/mtl.licensing-requirement. -
mtl.net-worth-requirementNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for us-state-mtl-baseline/mtl.net-worth-requirement. -
mtl.nmls-registrationNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for us-state-mtl-baseline/mtl.nmls-registration. -
mtl.permissible-investmentsNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for us-state-mtl-baseline/mtl.permissible-investments. -
mtl.surety-bondNo vendor in the registry declares implementsProvisions for us-state-mtl-baseline/mtl.surety-bond.
Not yet in force 137
-
fatf-r16.beneficiary-side-obligations-2025Provision fatf-r16.beneficiary-side-obligations-2025 takes effect 2030-12-31; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fatf-r16.confirmation-of-payee-2025Provision fatf-r16.confirmation-of-payee-2025 takes effect 2030-12-31; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fatf-r16.fraud-prevention-expansion-2025Provision fatf-r16.fraud-prevention-expansion-2025 takes effect 2030-12-31; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fatf-r16.iso-20022-integration-2025Provision fatf-r16.iso-20022-integration-2025 takes effect 2030-12-31; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fatf-r16.proliferation-financing-expansion-2025Provision fatf-r16.proliferation-financing-expansion-2025 takes effect 2030-12-31; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.bsa-sanctions-complianceProvision fdic-nprm-2026.bsa-sanctions-compliance takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.coordination-occ-frb-stateProvision fdic-nprm-2026.coordination-occ-frb-state takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.definition-eligible-financial-institutionProvision fdic-nprm-2026.definition-eligible-financial-institution takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.definition-outstanding-issuance-valueProvision fdic-nprm-2026.definition-outstanding-issuance-value takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.definition-significant-redemption-requestProvision fdic-nprm-2026.definition-significant-redemption-request takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.definition-tokenized-depositProvision fdic-nprm-2026.definition-tokenized-deposit takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.identifiable-reserves-by-brandProvision fdic-nprm-2026.identifiable-reserves-by-brand takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.monthly-cfo-attestation-and-pcaob-examProvision fdic-nprm-2026.monthly-cfo-attestation-and-pcaob-exam takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.monthly-reserve-composition-reportProvision fdic-nprm-2026.monthly-reserve-composition-report takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.part-330-no-passthrough-to-holdersProvision fdic-nprm-2026.part-330-no-passthrough-to-holders takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.part-330-tokenized-depositsProvision fdic-nprm-2026.part-330-tokenized-deposits takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.permissible-reserve-asset-typesProvision fdic-nprm-2026.permissible-reserve-asset-types takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.permitted-core-activitiesProvision fdic-nprm-2026.permitted-core-activities takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.permitted-supporting-activitiesProvision fdic-nprm-2026.permitted-supporting-activities takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-credit-to-customersProvision fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-credit-to-customers takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-deceptive-nameProvision fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-deceptive-name takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-evasionProvision fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-evasion takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-interest-yieldProvision fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-interest-yield takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-insuranceProvision fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-insurance takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-legal-tenderProvision fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-legal-tender takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-rehypothecationProvision fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-rehypothecation takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-unlawful-marketingProvision fdic-nprm-2026.prohibited-unlawful-marketing takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.quarterly-call-reportProvision fdic-nprm-2026.quarterly-call-report takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-disclosures-and-feesProvision fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-disclosures-and-fees takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-policy-disclosureProvision fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-policy-disclosure takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-timely-two-business-daysProvision fdic-nprm-2026.redemption-timely-two-business-days takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-1to1-and-custodyProvision fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-1to1-and-custody takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-fair-valueProvision fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-fair-value takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-monetization-capabilityProvision fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-monetization-capability takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-diversification-40pct-capProvision fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-diversification-40pct-cap takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-shortfall-fdic-discretionary-toolsProvision fdic-nprm-2026.reserve-shortfall-fdic-discretionary-tools takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.restoration-planProvision fdic-nprm-2026.restoration-plan takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-asset-growthProvision fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-asset-growth takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-insider-affiliate-transactionsProvision fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-insider-affiliate-transactions takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-interest-rateProvision fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-interest-rate takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-internal-auditProvision fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-internal-audit takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-internal-controlsProvision fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-internal-controls takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-it-securityProvision fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-it-security takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-liquidityProvision fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-liquidity takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-third-party-service-providersProvision fdic-nprm-2026.risk-management-third-party-service-providers takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.scope-fdic-supervised-ppsisProvision fdic-nprm-2026.scope-fdic-supervised-ppsis takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.severabilityProvision fdic-nprm-2026.severability takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.significant-redemption-requestProvision fdic-nprm-2026.significant-redemption-request takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
fdic-nprm-2026.subpart-b-fdic-supervised-custodiansProvision fdic-nprm-2026.subpart-b-fdic-supervised-custodians takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
genius-act.annual-audit-50bProvision genius-act.annual-audit-50b takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
genius-act.bankruptcy-reserves-excludedProvision genius-act.bankruptcy-reserves-excluded takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
genius-act.custody-bank-regulator-onlyProvision genius-act.custody-bank-regulator-only takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
genius-act.daps-3yr-unauthorized-stablecoin-banProvision genius-act.daps-3yr-unauthorized-stablecoin-ban takes effect 2028-07-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
genius-act.issuance-prohibitionProvision genius-act.issuance-prohibition takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
genius-act.monthly-reserve-disclosureProvision genius-act.monthly-reserve-disclosure takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
genius-act.permitted-issuer-classesProvision genius-act.permitted-issuer-classes takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
genius-act.redemption-disclosureProvision genius-act.redemption-disclosure takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
genius-act.reserves-1-to-1Provision genius-act.reserves-1-to-1 takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
genius-act.reserves-permitted-assetsProvision genius-act.reserves-permitted-assets takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
genius-act.reserves-rehypothecation-banProvision genius-act.reserves-rehypothecation-ban takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
genius-act.yield-prohibitionProvision genius-act.yield-prohibition takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.annual-audited-financial-statementProvision occ-nprm-2026.annual-audited-financial-statement takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.change-in-controlProvision occ-nprm-2026.change-in-control takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.custodial-property-protectionProvision occ-nprm-2026.custodial-property-protection takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.de-novo-capital-floorProvision occ-nprm-2026.de-novo-capital-floor takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.definition-eligible-financial-institutionProvision occ-nprm-2026.definition-eligible-financial-institution takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.definition-federal-qualified-ppsiProvision occ-nprm-2026.definition-federal-qualified-ppsi takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.definition-outstanding-issuance-valueProvision occ-nprm-2026.definition-outstanding-issuance-value takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.definition-state-qualified-ppsiProvision occ-nprm-2026.definition-state-qualified-ppsi takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.evasion-prohibitionProvision occ-nprm-2026.evasion-prohibition takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.examination-cadenceProvision occ-nprm-2026.examination-cadence takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.large-issuer-insured-deposit-floorProvision occ-nprm-2026.large-issuer-insured-deposit-floor takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.monthly-cfo-attestationProvision occ-nprm-2026.monthly-cfo-attestation takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.monthly-public-reserve-composition-reportProvision occ-nprm-2026.monthly-public-reserve-composition-report takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.omnibus-accounts-permittedProvision occ-nprm-2026.omnibus-accounts-permitted takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.ongoing-capital-requirementProvision occ-nprm-2026.ongoing-capital-requirement takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.permissible-reserve-asset-typesProvision occ-nprm-2026.permissible-reserve-asset-types takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.permitted-activitiesProvision occ-nprm-2026.permitted-activities takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.ppsi-application-approvalProvision occ-nprm-2026.ppsi-application-approval takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-deceptive-nameProvision occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-deceptive-name takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-interest-yieldProvision occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-interest-yield takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-insuranceProvision occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-insurance takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-legal-tenderProvision occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-misrepresentation-legal-tender takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-rehypothecationProvision occ-nprm-2026.prohibited-rehypothecation takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.quarterly-call-reportProvision occ-nprm-2026.quarterly-call-report takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.redemption-policy-disclosureProvision occ-nprm-2026.redemption-policy-disclosure takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.redemption-timelyProvision occ-nprm-2026.redemption-timely takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-monetization-capabilityProvision occ-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-monetization-capability takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-segregationProvision occ-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-segregation takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-withdrawal-after-attestationProvision occ-nprm-2026.reserve-asset-withdrawal-after-attestation takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.reserve-diversification-concentrationProvision occ-nprm-2026.reserve-diversification-concentration takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.reserve-shortfall-consequencesProvision occ-nprm-2026.reserve-shortfall-consequences takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.revocation-rescissionProvision occ-nprm-2026.revocation-rescission takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-information-tech-securityProvision occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-information-tech-security takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-interest-rateProvision occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-interest-rate takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-internal-controlsProvision occ-nprm-2026.risk-management-internal-controls takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.scope-six-entity-typesProvision occ-nprm-2026.scope-six-entity-types takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.self-custody-hardware-software-exclusionProvision occ-nprm-2026.self-custody-hardware-software-exclusion takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.severabilityProvision occ-nprm-2026.severability takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.third-party-service-provider-governanceProvision occ-nprm-2026.third-party-service-provider-governance takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
occ-nprm-2026.weekly-blockchain-reportingProvision occ-nprm-2026.weekly-blockchain-reporting takes effect 2027-01-18; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.314a-information-sharingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.314a-information-sharing takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.314b-voluntary-sharingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.314b-voluntary-sharing takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-customer-due-diligenceProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-customer-due-diligence takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-independent-testingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-independent-testing takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-maintainProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-maintain takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-officerProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-officer takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-program-generalProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-program-general takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-risk-based-controlsProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-risk-based-controls takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-trainingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.aml-cft-training takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.block-freeze-reject-capabilityProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.block-freeze-reject-capability takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.civil-money-penaltyProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.civil-money-penalty takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.correspondent-eddProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.correspondent-edd takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.ctr-filingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.ctr-filing takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.digital-asset-definedProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.digital-asset-defined takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.doj-referralProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.doj-referral takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.foreign-shell-bank-prohibitionProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.foreign-shell-bank-prohibition takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.lawful-order-complianceProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.lawful-order-compliance takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.lawful-order-definedProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.lawful-order-defined takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.ofac-blocked-rejected-reportingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.ofac-blocked-rejected-reporting takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.part-1033-definitionsProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.part-1033-definitions takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.ppsi-as-financial-institutionProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.ppsi-as-financial-institution takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.private-banking-eddProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.private-banking-edd takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.recordkeepingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.recordkeeping takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.recordkeeping-funds-transfersProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.recordkeeping-funds-transfers takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.sar-filingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.sar-filing takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-certification-productionProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-certification-production takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-general-requirementProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-general-requirement takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-internal-controlsProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-internal-controls takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-recordkeeping-reportingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-recordkeeping-reporting takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-risk-assessmentProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-risk-assessment takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-senior-management-commitmentProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-senior-management-commitment takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-testing-auditingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-testing-auditing takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-trainingProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.scp-training takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.supervision-and-enforcementProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.supervision-and-enforcement takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.transaction-includes-stablecoinProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.transaction-includes-stablecoin takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18. -
treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.travel-ruleProvision treasury-fincen-ofac-nprm-2026.travel-rule takes effect 2027-06-01; query.inForceBy=2026-07-18.
Every output is staged for human sign-off. This page codifies primary-source compliance rules across stablecoin-relevant regimes. It does not constitute legal, regulatory, tax, or accounting advice. The atlas registry is reviewed quarterly per the maintenance playbook.