Agentic Payments

Visa Tokenized Asset Platform

Visa's infrastructure for moving tokenized assets across blockchains via existing card-network rails.

Vendors

Visa · Partner Banks

Compliance Center

Card-network authorization + sanctions screening

A4V — Visa Tokenized Asset Platform · Rails: agentic · Protocols: Visa TAP, USDC · Origin: United States — Federal
CTR (USD 10,000+)TRAVEL-RULE (USD 3,000+)ENHANCED-DUE-DILIGENCE (USD 50,000+)
A4V — VISA TOKENIZED ASSET PLATFORMYOU ARE HERE● Bank/Fintech Ag…POLICY⬣ Visa Network Au…CODE≡ On-Chain Token …CODE● Acquiring Side …POLICY● Settlement Fina…POLICYIntentIdentityDiscoveryNegotiationTransportAuthorizationFacilitationFinalitySTEP 1STEP 2STEP 3STEP 4STEP 5ETHEREUMVisual system: StablecoinAtlas.com · Steps mapped to 8 STP Stages
L5 APPLICATIONL4 ACCOUNTL3 EXECUTIONL2 CONSENSUSL1 NETWORKETHEREUM
L5 APPLICATIONWallet UX, consent, policy engineBank customer channel / issuer app
L4 ACCOUNTBalances, addresses, signing keysCore banking ledger / DDA

Step 1 · Bank/Fintech Agent (Issuing Side)Policy-EnforcedBlockchain-Native

A card issuer's customer onboarding — KYB/KYC established, credit line authorized.

The issuing bank or fintech agent initiates a tokenized asset movement via Visa TAP. Identity and licensing gates are policy-enforced at L4+L5. The institution operates under existing banking/EMI licenses — Visa TAP inherits the issuer's compliance posture.

Active Compliance Checkpoints
C2 OFAC SDN/SSI list screening — OFAC 50 USC § 1702 (United States — Federal) · GENIUS §6
⚠ ENHANCED-DUE-DILIGENCE triggered at USD 50,000 — 31 CFR § 1010.312 — Enhanced Due Diligence (United States — Federal)
Counterparty
Self (issuing institution)
Latency
Instant · API call
Finality
N/A — instruction only
Vendors
MetaMask / Fireblocks · EOA / ERC-4337
L5 APPLICATIONL4 ACCOUNTL3 EXECUTIONL2 CONSENSUSL1 NETWORKETHEREUM
L4 ACCOUNTBalances, addresses, signing keysCore banking ledger / DDA
L3 EXECUTIONSmart contracts, swap / bridge logicClearing & matching engine
◆ Enforcement Line — code-enforced below, policy-enforced above

Step 2 · Visa Network AuthorizationCode-EnforcedBlockchain-Native

Traditional card authorization — the network validates the transaction, checks sanctions, verifies limits, and routes to the acquiring side.

Visa's network layer performs sanctions screening, transaction limits validation, and counterparty verification. The TAP smart contract layer enforces programmable compliance rules. L3+L4 lit — Visa's authorization straddles the enforcement line between network rules (code) and institutional policy.

Active Compliance Checkpoints
C2 OFAC SDN/SSI list screening — OFAC 50 USC § 1702 (United States — Federal) · GENIUS §6
Counterparty
Visa TAP network
Latency
<1s · off-chain auth + on-chain verification
Finality
Pre-condition gate — blocks if authorization fails
Vendors
Chainalysis OFAC Oracle · Uniswap v4 · Circle CCTP v2 · EOA / ERC-4337
L5 APPLICATIONL4 ACCOUNTL3 EXECUTIONL2 CONSENSUSL1 NETWORKETHEREUM
L3 EXECUTIONSmart contracts, swap / bridge logicClearing & matching engine
L2 CONSENSUSValidator ordering, block productionRTGS settlement engine
L1 NETWORKP2P, finality, data availabilityMessaging rail (SWIFT / Fedwire)
◆ Enforcement Line — code-enforced below, policy-enforced above

Step 3 · On-Chain Token MovementCode-EnforcedBlockchain-Native

The settlement leg of a card transaction — value moves from issuer's reserve to acquirer's account.

Tokenized asset moves on-chain via Visa TAP smart contracts. L1+L2+L3 lit — the transfer executes entirely below the enforcement line. Visa's programmable compliance layer can enforce transfer restrictions, whitelists, and velocity limits at the contract level.

Counterparty
Visa TAP settlement contract
Latency
~12s · single Ethereum block
Finality
Pending · awaiting network confirmation
Vendors
Circle CCTP v2 · Ethereum P2P + EIP-4844 · Ethereum PoS Validators · Uniswap v4 · Chainalysis OFAC Oracle
L5 APPLICATIONL4 ACCOUNTL3 EXECUTIONL2 CONSENSUSL1 NETWORKETHEREUM
L5 APPLICATIONWallet UX, consent, policy engineBank customer channel / issuer app
L4 ACCOUNTBalances, addresses, signing keysCore banking ledger / DDA

Step 4 · Acquiring Side ReceiptPolicy-EnforcedBlockchain-Native

The acquiring bank's settlement receipt — funds credited, reconciliation begins.

The acquiring institution receives the tokenized asset. L4+L5 lit on the receiving side. The acquirer's compliance obligations activate — recordkeeping, reconciliation, and any jurisdiction-specific reporting. Visa TAP provides the settlement confirmation to both sides.

Active Compliance Checkpoints
C2 OFAC SDN/SSI list screening — OFAC 50 USC § 1702 (United States — Federal) · GENIUS §6
C7 Notabene IVMS101 or Chainalysis Connect — FATF Rec. 16; 31 CFR 1010.410(f) (United States — Federal) · GENIUS §7, §8
⚠ CTR triggered at USD 10,000 — 31 CFR § 1010.311 — Currency Transaction Report (United States — Federal)
⚠ TRAVEL-RULE triggered at USD 3,000 — 31 CFR § 1010.410(f) — Funds Transfer Recordkeeping (United States — Federal)
Counterparty
Acquiring institution
Latency
Instant on block confirmation
Finality
Final on Ethereum confirmation
Vendors
MetaMask / Fireblocks · EOA / ERC-4337
L5 APPLICATIONL4 ACCOUNTL3 EXECUTIONL2 CONSENSUSL1 NETWORKETHEREUM
L5 APPLICATIONWallet UX, consent, policy engineBank customer channel / issuer app

Step 5 · Settlement Finality & ReportingPolicy-EnforcedBlockchain-Native

End-of-day settlement report — the card network's final reconciliation record.

Visa TAP settlement is final. Both institutions receive settlement confirmation with full audit trail. Tax reporting and recordkeeping obligations crystallize. L5 Application lit only — finality lives entirely in the policy layer.

Active Compliance Checkpoints
C11 SAR/CTR filing via BSA E-Filing — 31 CFR § 1010.320 (United States — Federal) · GENIUS §9
Counterparty
Visa settlement network
Latency
T+0 (same-day)
Finality
Final · irrevocable
Vendors
EOA / ERC-4337 · MetaMask / Fireblocks

Resolved 5 steps across 1 chain(s). 3 threshold(s) triggered. Frameworks: Bank Secrecy Act, GENIUS Act, OFAC Sanctions Program, FATF Recommendation 16 (Travel Rule), Common Reporting Standard / FATCA.

TOOL 01 · 8×10 COMPARISON MATRIX

Agentic Framework Landscape

Compare ACK, x402, Stripe ACP, Visa IC, Mastercard Agent Pay, Google A2A, Circle CPN, and Tether across 10 compliance dimensions.

Agent Payment Framework Audit Readiness

Interactive landscape of 8 payment frameworks and their audit/compliance capabilities

Hover over cells for details. Click a framework row to expand insights. Green = Implemented, Amber = Partial, Red = Absent, Blue = Planned

Framework
Transaction Monitoring
Identity Verification
Sanctions Screening
Audit Trail Export
Receipt Verification
Regulatory Tagging
Delegation Audit
Human-in-the-Loop
Open Specification
Agent-Specific Risk
Score
ACK
Catena Labs
HIGH
7.5/10
x402
Coinbase
LOW
1.0/10
Stripe ACP
Stripe
MEDIUM
5.0/10
Visa Intelligent Commerce
Visa
MEDIUM-HIGH
5.5/10
Mastercard Agent Pay
Mastercard
MEDIUM-HIGH
5.5/10
Google A2A
Google
NONE
1.0/10
Circle CPN
Circle
MEDIUM
5.0/10
Tether
Tether Operations Limited
LOW
2.0/10

Legend

Implemented — Feature fully deployed
Partial — Feature partially supported
Absent — Feature not available
Planned — Roadmap feature
Readiness Badges: HIGH (green) = Audit-ready today | MEDIUM-HIGH (teal) = Minor gaps | MEDIUM (amber) = Significant gaps | LOW (red) = Major work needed | NONE (grey) = No audit infrastructure
Data as of April 1, 2026. Tether KPMG audit engagement March 2026. For updates and methodology, visit stablecoinatlas.com/audit